XNAV vs XRLX

FundX Aggressive ETF against FundX Conservative ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
30%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
XRLX is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.0 pts
XNAV is ahead
Larger fund
XRLX
$48M

Side by side

XNAVXRLX
FundFundX Aggressive ETFFundX Conservative ETF
IssuerFundXFundX
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio1.27%1.20%
Assets$32M$48M
Average daily dollar volume$68K$157K
ListedJul 1, 2002Jul 1, 2002
FrenzyCap score1620
1-month return+3.2%+1.8%
3-month return+1.7%+1.9%
Year to date+15.2%+7.6%
1-year return+16.5%+6.5%
30-day volatility17.0%8.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−16.3%−7.8%
Trailing 12-month yield0.50%2.58%
Holdings2221
Top 10 weight61.2%63.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.1M thru Jun 2026−$3.9M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

33% of XNAV · 32% of XRLX
HoldingXNAVXRLX
VUG9.37%9.21%
VLUE7.35%6.35%
MTUM5.84%4.87%
QGRW5.74%4.78%
SPMO4.38%6.77%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · XNAV holdings · XRLX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.