AGFY Agrify Corporation Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 141
- List Date
- 2021-01-28
- CIK
- 0001800637
- Last Earnings
- Aug 4
- Headquarters
- Rolling Meadows, IL
- Homepage
- https://www.agrify.com
Agrify Corp is a developer of branded inventive solutions for the cannabis and hemp industries. Its Senorita brand offers consumers hemp-derived tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) beverages that mirror cocktails like a margarita - in three flavors - classic Lime Jalapeno Margarita, Mango Margarita, and Paloma. In addition to beverages, Agrify has also historically been a provider of inventive cultivation and extraction solutions for the cannabis industry. Its comprehensive extraction product line, which includes hydrocarbon, alcohol, solventless, post-processing, and lab equipment, empowers producers …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: AGFY
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key drivers:
- Strong technical momentum signals, including a bullish MACD crossover and overbought RSI
- Recent news headlines are neutral, indicating no significant sentiment impact
Primary risks:
- Volatility regime suggests low risk relative to market
- Beta indicates stock moves less than market, reducing overall risk
Investment thesis: AGFY presents an attractive buying opportunity due to its strong technical momentum, low volatility, and relatively defensive beta. The recent name change to RYTHM, Inc. may not have significantly impacted sentiment.
Recent news sentiment impact: NEUTRAL
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Bullish, Medium-term (1-3 months) - Bullish, Long-term (3-12 months) - Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($42.21)
- Recent high ($47.12)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (>70), indicating potential sell signal
- MACD signal: Bullish crossover above signal line, indicating continued upward momentum
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (price approaching upper band), indicating potential breakout
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with a volume rate of change of 405.73%.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines, including a name change and stock purchase by interim CEO Benjamin Kovler.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: None significant in recent news headlines.
Market Narrative: The neutral sentiment and lack of significant market-moving news suggest AGFY's price movement is driven primarily by technical factors.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta = 0.78).
Volatility Regime: Low volatility, indicating reduced overall risk.
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $30.33 (SMA 20) and $26.52 (SMA 50) provide some protection against potential price declines.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: AGFY's beta suggests it moves less than the broader market, indicating a relatively defensive position within its sector.
Institutional Activity: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with a volume rate of change of 405.73%.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation indicates low correlation between AGFY and the broader market, suggesting reduced volatility.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, indicating no significant undervaluation or overvaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at $30.33 (SMA 20) and $26.52 (SMA 50)
- Resistance at $42.21 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None significant in recent price action.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings date: 2025-10-08
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around the SMA 20 and SMA 50, with position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and should not be considered as personalized investment advice.
AGFY Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
AGFY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
AGFY Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-08-27| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-27 | RSLGH, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | +1,526,718 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-30 | Timothy Mahoney | Director | Sell (S) | −4,999 | $20.29 | -$101.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-24 | Timothy Mahoney | Director | Sell (S) | −1 | $24.00 | -$24 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-13 | Sanjay Tolia | Director | Mixed Exer +1,250 · Grant +5,000 |
+6,250 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-13 | Armon Vakili | Director | Mixed Exer +5,000 · Grant +5,000 |
+10,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-13 | Max Holtzman | Director | Mixed Exer +5,000 · Grant +5,000 |
+10,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-13 | Peter S. Shapiro | Director | Mixed Grant +5,000 · Exer +1,250 |
+6,250 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-13 | Timothy Mahoney | Director | Mixed Grant +5,000 · Exer +5,000 |
+10,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-13 | Krishnan Varier | Director | Mixed Grant +5,000 · Sell −5,000 · Exer +5,000 |
+5,000 | $24.03 | -$120.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-29 | Green Thumb Industries Inc. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +32,300 | $25.20 | $813.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-28 | Krishnan Varier | Director | Mixed Sell −7,936 · Exer +6,839 |
−1,097 | $25.55 | -$202.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-28 | Max Holtzman | Director | Mixed Sell −7,096 · Exer +7,096 |
— | $23.05 | -$163.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-28 | Timothy Mahoney | Director | Mixed Sell −7,232 · Exer +7,232 |
— | $23.83 | -$172.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-22 | RSLGH, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-12 | Green Thumb Industries Inc. | 10%+ Owner | Exer (M) | +18,614 RSU | — | EDGAR |
AGFY Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $47.12| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green Thumb Industries Inc. | 10%+ Owner | 697,861 | $32.88M | $813.9K | 3 | 2025-05-29 |
| 2 | Benjamin Kovler | Interim CEO | 15,420 | $726.6K | $248.3K | 2 | 2024-11-25 |
| 3 | Brian Towns | EVP - Extraction | 11,639 | $548.4K | -$212.3K | 4 | 2024-12-05 |
| 4 | Krishnan Varier | Director | 10,000 | $471.2K | -$322.9K | 8 | 2025-06-13 |
| 5 | Peter S. Shapiro | Director | 6,300 | $296.9K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-13 |
| 6 | Timothy Mahoney | Director | 5,314 | $250.4K | -$320.6K | 11 | 2025-06-30 |
| 7 | David Aaron Kessler | Chief Science Officer | 5,210 | $245.5K | -$509.1K | 6 | 2024-12-05 |
| 8 | Max Holtzman | Director | 5,000 | $235.6K | -$209.3K | 8 | 2025-06-13 |
| 9 | Sanjay Tolia | Director | 5,000 | $235.6K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-13 |
| 10 | Armon Vakili | Director | 5,000 | $235.6K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-13 |
AGFY Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 3, 2026Directors 7
- Krishnan Varier · since Jan 27, 2021
- Timothy Mahoney · since Jan 27, 2021
- Max Holtzman · since Jul 14, 2022
- Armon Vakili · since Nov 5, 2024
- Benjamin Kovler · since Nov 5, 2024
- Peter S. Shapiro · since Jan 31, 2025
- Sanjay Tolia · since Jan 31, 2025
Officers 2
- Benjamin Kovler · Interim CEO · since Nov 5, 2024
- Brad Asher · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 24, 2025
10% owners 2
- Green Thumb Industries Inc. (entity) · since Nov 5, 2024
- Rslgh, LLC (entity) · since Nov 5, 2024
Changes in the last 10 years (53)
| Mar 24, 2025 | Brad Asher became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 31, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Richard A Drexler from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Sanjay Tolia became a director |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Peter S. Shapiro became a director |
| Jan 3, 2025 | Raymond Nobu Chang reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 3, 2025 | Raymond Nobu Chang reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 3, 2025 | Raymond Nobu Chang reported in an SEC filing no longer being CEO and Chairman |
| Jan 3, 2025 | I-Tseng Jenny Chan reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 3, 2025 | I-Tseng Jenny Chan reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 31, 2024 | The company announced the departure of David Aaron Kessler as Chief Science Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 16, 2024 | Rslgh, LLC no longer listed as President and CEO in SEC filings |
| Dec 3, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Brian Towns as EVP - Extraction in an SEC filing |
| Dec 2, 2024 | David Aaron Kessler listed as Chief Science Officer (previously Chief Scientific Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 2, 2024 | Brian Towns listed as EVP - Extraction (previously EVP - Extraction Division) in SEC filings |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Rslgh, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Rslgh, LLC became President and CEO |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Richard A Drexler became a director |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Green Thumb Industries Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Benjamin Kovler became a director |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Benjamin Kovler became Interim CEO |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Armon Vakili became a director |
| May 17, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Leonard J Sokolow from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 28, 2024 | Chinwei Wang became a 10% owner |
| Jan 8, 2024 | I-Tseng Jenny Chan became a director |
| Jan 8, 2024 | I-Tseng Jenny Chan became a 10% owner |
| Nov 30, 2023 | Raymond Nobu Chang first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Jun 1, 2023 | Brian Towns became EVP - Extraction Division |
| May 22, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Stuart Anthony Wilcox as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 2, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Timothy Oakes as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Nov 1, 2022 | Timothy John Hayden became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Aug 10, 2022 | Timothy Oakes first listed as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 18, 2022 | Stuart Anthony Wilcox first listed as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 14, 2022 | Steve Drucker became Chief Information Officer |
| Jul 14, 2022 | Max Holtzman became a director |
| Jul 14, 2022 | David Aaron Kessler became Chief Scientific Officer |
| Jul 14, 2022 | Christopher J Benyo became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Jul 11, 2022 | Thomas L Massie reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 23, 2021 | Leonard J Sokolow became a director |
| Dec 12, 2021 | The company announced the departure of Timothy Oakes from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Raymond Nobu Chang no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Raymond Nobu Chang listed as CEO and Chairman (previously CEO & Chairman of the BOD) in SEC filings |
| Feb 17, 2021 | Stuart Anthony Wilcox became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Timothy Oakes became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Timothy Mahoney became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Thomas L Massie became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Raymond Nobu Chang became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Raymond Nobu Chang became a 10% owner |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Raymond Nobu Chang became CEO & Chairman of the BOD |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Niv Krikov became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Matthew Kressy became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Krishnan Varier became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | Guichao Hua became a director |
| Jan 27, 2021 | became Chief Operating Officer |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (9)
- Chinwei Wang · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 29, 2024
- Guichao Hua · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 30, 2023
- Timothy John Hayden · Last reported as Chief Revenue Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2022
- Christopher J Benyo · Last reported as Chief Revenue Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 10, 2022
- Steve Drucker · Last reported as Chief Information Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 10, 2022
- Stuart Anthony Wilcox · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 8, 2022
- Niv Krikov · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 19, 2021
- · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 27, 2021
- Matthew Kressy · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 27, 2021
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
AGFY vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BV BrightView Holdings, Inc. Common Stock | $1.1B | — | +1.5% | −5.4% | 37 |
| AVO Mission Produce, Inc. Common Stock | $1.0B | 398.3 | −6.2% | +3.2% | 30 |
| CVGW Calavo Growers Inc | $466M | 29.0 | −10.5% | +19.7% | — |
| BNC BNB Standard Corporation Common Stock | $238M | — | — | −24.6% | 22 |
| AGFY Agrify Corporation Common Stock | $60M | — | — | +46.1% | — |
| RYM RYTHM, Inc. Common Stock | $35M | — | — | −23.5% | — |
| PFAI Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Comm | $33M | — | — | +31.3% | — |
| VAPE CEA Industries Inc. Common Stock | $15M | — | — | — | — |
| Peer median | $238M | 213.7 | −6.2% | −1.1% | 30 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.