BFRG Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 17
- List Date
- 2023-02-14
- CIK
- 0001829247
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.09) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Gaithersburg, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.bullfrogai.com
Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc is a clinical-phase Biotechnology company using machine learning to advance medicine and improve human health. It uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to advance medicines for both internal and external projects. The Company is focused specifically on advance artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)- driven analysis of complex datasets in medicine and healthcare. The Company's objective is to use its AI/ML platform to provide a precision-medicine approach to drug-asset enablement through external partnerships and selective internal development.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 62.67% | 12.20% | -30.70% | 14.72% |
| Feb | -38.03% | 17.70% | -9.13% | -0.92% | -7.60% |
| Mar | 23.72% | -27.70% | -12.70% | 190.76% | 43.52% |
| Apr | -4.69% | 3.97% | 7.27% | -56.73% | -12.54% |
| May | -4.15% | -7.96% | -5.00% | 8.48% | -2.16% |
| Jun | -26.90% | -41.36% | -11.70% | 1.05% | -19.73% |
| Jul | 35.44% | 74.56% | -11.61% | -21.59% | 19.20% |
| Aug | -36.68% | -10.73% | -6.92% | -6.94% | -15.32% |
| Sep | 2.84% | 22.13% | 14.75% | 23.65% | 15.84% |
| Oct | -16.42% | -14.61% | -11.72% | -23.44%* | -16.55% |
| Nov | 6.31% | -6.11% | -13.79% | -- | -4.53% |
| Dec | 16.43% | -5.21% | -8.08% | -- | 1.05% |
| Total | -53.28% | 12.35% | -47.10% | -34.59% | -30.66% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for BFRG:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (confidence level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
- High volatility, indicating increased risk
- Recent negative news headlines
Primary Risks:
- Continued market uncertainty and potential downturn
- Over-reliance on AI-driven solutions, increasing competition
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive sentiment from recent news headlines has been largely offset by the bearish momentum signals in technical indicators.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH; Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL; Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages: SMA 20 ($0.69), EMA 12 ($0.68); Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($0.78)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (30-70)
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating increased volatility
Volume Analysis: Volume trends: Moderate increase; Institutional interest signals: Low to moderate
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been positive, highlighting the company's AI-driven solutions. However, the bearish momentum signals in technical indicators outweigh this sentiment.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, with a slight bias towards positivity.
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts; Earnings information not available
Market Narrative: The market narrative is uncertain, with mixed signals from recent headlines and technical indicators. This uncertainty increases the risk for BFRG.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is high, indicating increased risk; Historical volatility: HV20 96.2%, HV30 88.0%
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 20 ($0.69), EMA 12 ($0.68); Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels at $0.65 and position sizing considerations.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: WEAK (compared to SPY)
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest signals; Volume patterns suggesting low institutional activity.
Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): Weak correlation (0.25), indicating high risk
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: MIDDLE (compared to historical levels)
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance at SMA 20 ($0.69) and Upper Bollinger Band ($0.78)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: Breakout above $0.80, breakdown below $0.65
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts; Earnings information not available
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at $0.65 and position sizing considerations.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and may not reflect real-world market conditions or actual stock performance.
BFRG Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $257K | #5232 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BFRG Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BFRG Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-22| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Vininder Singh | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +75,000 | $0.60 | $44.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-22 | Joshua Blacher | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $0.53 | $26.4K | EDGAR |
BFRG Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $0.48| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vininder Singh | Chief Executive Officer | 2,442,446 | $1.17M | $44.9K | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
| 2 | Joshua Blacher | Chief Financial Officer | 65,000 | $31.3K | $26.4K | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
BFRG Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 22, 2026Directors 4
- Jason David Hanson · since Feb 13, 2023
- R Don Elsey · since Feb 13, 2023
- Vininder Singh · since Feb 13, 2023
- William Enright · since Feb 13, 2023
Officers 2
- Vininder Singh · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 13, 2023
- Joshua Blacher · Chief Financial Officer · since Dec 12, 2024
10% owners 1
- Vininder Singh · since Feb 13, 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (10)
| Dec 12, 2024 | Joshua Blacher became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 7, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Dane R Saglio as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Dane R Saglio first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 13, 2023 | William Enright became a director |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Vininder Singh became a director |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Vininder Singh became a 10% owner |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Vininder Singh became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 13, 2023 | R Don Elsey became a director |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Jason David Hanson became a director |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Dane R Saglio became Chief Financial Officer |
Not reported recently (1)
- Dane R Saglio · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 22, 2024
BFRG Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-07-02What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-02 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $76.5K | 2025-07-01 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-03 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $82.5K | 2025-04-01 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-06 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $104.5K | 2025-01-02 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-03 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $133.5K | 2024-10-01 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-02 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $88.5K | 2024-07-01 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-03 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 250,000 | $755.0K | 2024-04-02 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-23 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $312.5K | 2024-01-19 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-02 | Vininder Singh | CEO | 50,000 | $162.5K | 2024-01-02 | Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $55,068 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.