BOT RoboStrategy, Inc. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.6B
- List Date
- 2026-05-07
- CIK
- 0002081119
- Homepage
- https://www.robostrategy.co
RoboStrategy Inc is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation, principally through capital gains on equity and equity-linked investments in robotics and embodied AI companies. The Fund focuses on private, venture-capital-backed companies with growth potential, many of which are not yet publicly listed or widely accessible to individual investors.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -36.21% | -36.21% |
| Jun | 73.88% | 73.88% |
| Jul | -34.58% | -34.58% |
| Aug | -8.30% | -8.30% |
| Sep | 3.67% | 3.67% |
| Oct | -11.23%* | -11.23% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -38.76% | -38.76% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for BOT:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH/NEUTRAL (confidence level 6)
Key drivers and primary risks:
- Recent negative news sentiment
- Lack of technical momentum signals
- High beta and volatility
- No earnings data available
Investment thesis: The stock's recent decline may be a short-term opportunity to buy, but the lack of technical momentum and high risk profile require caution.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news headlines have been largely negative, contributing to the stock's downward trend.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
- Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- Long-term (3-12 months): NEUTRAL
Support/Resistance Levels: The stock is trading below its SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 26. The upper Bollinger Band resistance level is $N/A.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: N/A (oversold <30)
- MACD signal: No signal due to lack of data
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: The volume indicators, including the Volume SMA 20 and On-Balance Volume (OBV), are not providing clear buy or sell signals.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Two recent news headlines have been negative, contributing to the stock's downward trend.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or significant events scheduled.
Market Narrative: The negative news sentiment has overshadowed any technical momentum signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The beta is N/A (vs SPY), indicating high risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility level is high, with a stock volatility of N/A and an IV premium vs HV30 of N/A (positive = implied richer than realized).
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are at SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 26. Risk management considerations include setting stop-loss levels and adjusting position size accordingly.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No sector performance data available. Institutional Activity: No institutional activity data available. Correlation Analysis: N/A (no correlation data available). Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within a trading range with no clear relative value assessment.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support levels are at SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 26. Resistance levels are above the upper Bollinger Band resistance level ($N/A).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The stock needs to break above the upper Bollinger Band resistance level or below the lower Bollinger Band support level for significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or significant events scheduled.
Risk Management: Set stop-loss levels and adjust position size accordingly. Consider using options strategies to manage risk.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, which is incomplete (e.g., no earnings data available). The assessment is subjective and may change as more information becomes available.
BOT Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 116
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $721K | #3041 of 3716 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BOT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.18M | 52.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.94M | 32.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $779.10K | 12.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $91.42K | 1.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $39.75K | 0.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $4.36M | 55.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.34M | 29.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $596.25K | 7.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $465.07K | 5.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $83.47K | 1.06% | 2026-06-30 |
BOT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | FP Strategies LLC | Other (J) | −50,000 | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-07-15 | Andrew Kai Kang | President | Mixed | +229,905 | $36.71 | $10.00M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-15 | Marc Adam Weinstein | COO and Secretary | Other (J) | −7,500 | — | EDGAR |
BOT Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $23.94| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrew Kai Kang | President | 4,081,687 | $97.72M | $10.00M | 1 | 2026-07-15 |
| 2 | Marc Adam Weinstein | COO and Secretary | 750,000 | $17.95M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-15 |
| 3 | FP Strategies LLC | 340,000 | $8.14M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-15 |
BOT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 15, 2026Directors 6
- Andrew Kai Kang · since Sep 9, 2025
- James Michael Fields · since Sep 9, 2025
- Jason Zhao · since Sep 9, 2025
- Marc Adam Weinstein · since Sep 9, 2025
- Wei-Yen Yeh · since Sep 9, 2025
- Nicolas Elliott Carter · since Mar 26, 2026
Officers 3
- Andrew Kai Kang · President · since Sep 9, 2025
- Marc Adam Weinstein · COO and Secretary · listed since May 2026
- Robert Lance Baker · Treasurer · since Sep 9, 2025
10% owners 1
- Andrew Kai Kang · since Sep 9, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (11)
| May 5, 2026 | Marc Adam Weinstein listed as COO and Secretary (previously Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Mar 26, 2026 | Nicolas Elliott Carter became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Wei-Yen Yeh became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Robert Lance Baker became Treasurer |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Marc Adam Weinstein became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Marc Adam Weinstein became Secretary |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Jason Zhao became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | James Michael Fields became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Andrew Kai Kang became a director |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Andrew Kai Kang became a 10% owner |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Andrew Kai Kang became President |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.