CCEL Cryo-Cell International Inc.
XASE
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-MISC HEALTH & ALLIED SERVICES, NEC (8090) · industry map
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 76
- CIK
- 0000862692
- Headquarters
- Oldsmar, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.cryo-cell.com
Cryo-Cell International Inc is engaged in cellular processing and cryogenic storage. The company is organized into three reportable segments namely cellular processing and cryogenic storage, with a focus on the collection and preservation of umbilical cord blood and tissue stem cells for family use and the manufacturing of PrepaCyte CB units segment, which is a processing technology used to process umbilical cord blood stem cells. The cellular processing and cryogenic storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells for public use. The company generates maximum revenue from Cellular processing and C…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -22.16% | -6.91% | -10.17% | 5.62% | -3.21% | -7.37% |
| Feb | -- | -13.51% | -5.21% | -4.24% | 4.36% | 0.59% | -3.60% |
| Mar | -- | -6.15% | -20.94% | 51.93% | -5.21% | 8.23% | 5.57% |
| Apr | -- | -16.53% | 95.31% | 11.37% | -18.48% | -5.26% | 13.28% |
| May | -- | -3.46% | -23.50% | -0.84% | -1.54% | -3.71% | -6.61% |
| Jun | -- | -5.45% | 24.86% | -9.51% | 4.43% | -10.14% | 0.84% |
| Jul | -- | -0.17% | -11.09% | 0.40% | -6.31% | 1.79% | -3.08% |
| Aug | 0.00% | 33.51% | 6.86% | -15.76% | -5.24% | 20.69% | 6.68% |
| Sep | -1.58% | -12.98% | -10.70% | -4.07% | -1.69% | 0.85% | -5.03% |
| Oct | 4.24% | -23.23% | -0.76% | 17.44% | -1.96% | 22.68%* | 3.07% |
| Nov | -1.75% | -11.18% | 4.90% | 20.25% | -4.23% | -- | 1.60% |
| Dec | -6.22% | -7.84% | -1.54% | -13.23% | -13.57% | -- | -8.48% |
| Total | -5.47% | -64.91% | 13.18% | 29.85% | -37.97% | 31.29% | -5.67% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: CCEL
Executive Summary
This report presents a comprehensive stock analysis for CCEL, with an overall assessment of BEARISH (confidence level 6/10). Key drivers include the bearish MACD signal and neutral RSI reading, while primary risks are the high beta value indicating increased volatility. Recent news sentiment has been positive, but technical signals suggest a potential reversal.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: BEARISH, Medium-term: NEUTRAL, Long-term: UPTRENDING
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $3.35
- Middle band: $3.51
- Upper band: $3.67
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 51.56 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.01 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: -0.01 (bearish)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 7982.65
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 411697.13
- Volume Rate of Change: 46.85%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Recent news highlights the growth potential in the stem cell banking market, with two positive headlines focusing on Cord Blood Banking Services and Stem Cell Banking Market opportunities.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive (80% positive, 20% neutral)
Catalyst Identification: No earnings data available, but upcoming catalysts could include regulatory changes or product launches.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta: 0.41)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations suggest a potential downside target of $3.35.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: CCEL is outperforming the sector, with a relative strength indicator of 0.9.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no specific data available.
Correlation Analysis: Low correlation (0.09) between CCEL and SPY, indicating potential divergence from market trends.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical price levels: $3.35 (support), $3.51 (resistance)
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: $3.67 (upper band), $3.35 (lower band)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings data available
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations suggest a potential stop-loss at $3.45.
Recommendations: Given the bearish technical signals and low volatility, I recommend caution when considering an entry or exit strategy for CCEL. Monitor key price levels and potential catalysts to adjust risk management accordingly.
CCEL Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
CCEL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
CCEL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-07| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Other (J) | 600,191 (reclass) | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-07 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Other (J) | 600,191 (reclass) | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Jill M Taymans | VP Finance, CFO | Exer (M) | +7,500 | $3.10 | $23.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-09 | Jill M Taymans | VP Finance, CFO | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-09 | Mark L. Portnoy | Co-CEO | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-09 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-09 | Oleg Mikulinsky | Chief Information Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-24 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Award (A) | +2,445 | $4.06 | $9.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-19 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Award (A) | +3,990 | $4.05 | $16.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-12 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Award (A) | +5,540 | $4.14 | $22.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-04 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Award (A) | +9,666 | $4.42 | $42.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-23 | Daniel Mizrahi | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-23 | Harold D. Berger | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-18 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Buy (P) | +17,175 | $4.45 | $76.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-10 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | Buy (P) | +42,900 | $4.43 | $190.0K | EDGAR |
CCEL Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $4.97| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark L. Portnoy | Co-CEO | 864,239 | $4.29M | $0 | 9 | 2026-01-09 |
| 2 | David Portnoy | Chairman, Co-CEO | 411,620 | $2.05M | $523.5K | 24 | 2026-08-07 |
| 3 | Oleg Mikulinsky | Chief Information Officer | 104,349 | $518.5K | $0 | 8 | 2026-01-09 |
| 4 | Harold D. Berger | Director | 57,901 | $287.7K | $0 | 7 | 2025-10-23 |
| 5 | Jill M Taymans | VP Finance, CFO | 52,896 | $262.8K | $0 | 5 | 2026-05-29 |
| 6 | Daniel Mizrahi | Director | 30,634 | $152.2K | $0 | 1 | 2025-10-23 |
CCEL Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 7, 2026Directors 4
- David Portnoy · since Aug 30, 2011
- Harold D. Berger · since Aug 30, 2011
- Mark L. Portnoy · since Aug 30, 2011
- Daniel Mizrahi · on file since Oct 2025
Officers 4
- Mark L. Portnoy · Co-Chief Executive Officer · since Aug 30, 2011
- David Portnoy · Chairman, Co-CEO · listed since Aug 2020
- Jill M Taymans · VP, Finance, CFO · on file since Apr 2006
- Oleg Mikulinsky · Chief Information Officer · since Mar 5, 2012
10% owners 2
- David Portnoy · listed since Feb 2022
- Mark L. Portnoy · listed since Feb 2022
Changes in the last 10 years (11)
| Oct 23, 2025 | Daniel Mizrahi first on file as a director |
| Feb 8, 2022 | Mark L. Portnoy first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Feb 8, 2022 | David Portnoy first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Dec 13, 2021 | The company announced the departure of Brian L. Sheehy from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 21, 2021 | Jonathan H. Wheeler reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 24, 2020 | Arthur Ellis reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 3, 2020 | David Portnoy listed as Chairman, Co-CEO (previously Co-Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Aug 13, 2018 | Brian L. Sheehy became a director |
| Aug 13, 2018 | Arthur Ellis became a director |
| Aug 14, 2017 | Mary J Nyberg reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CDMJ Nyberg Family Trust reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (1)
- George Gaines · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 1, 2021
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.