The Walt Disney Company(DIS)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $92.19 – $117.09
- YTD
- -6.83%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 13.5
- Straddle Price
- $6.06
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.23
- Market Cap
- $177.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.94% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.04 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.35% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.49% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +6.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +18bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 27.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +12.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $8.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 7.8% |
| Book / Price | 63.0% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 8.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.32 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +12.6% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $102.88 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $106.82 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 7.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $32.2B |
| Market Cap | $186B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $103.04 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $29.44 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $54.63 | 6% | median 10.2× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $78.96 | 6% | median 7.6× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $126.05 | 6% | median 1.9× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | $87.99 | 6% | median 1.4× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $102.88 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $102.59 | 19% | 39 strikes · skew -1.77 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-MISCELLANEOUS AMUSEMENT & RECREATION (7990)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $177.3B
Disney operates in three global business segments: entertainment, sports, and experiences. Entertainment and experiences both benefit from the firm's ownership of iconic franchises and characters. Entertainment includes the ABC broadcast network, several cable television networks, and the Disney+ and Hulu streaming services. Within the segment, Disney also engages in movie and television production and distribution, with content licensed to movie theaters, other content providers, or, increasingly, kept in-house for use on Disney's own streaming platform and television networks. The sports seg…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.13% | 23 |
| Feb | +2.42% | 23 |
| Mar | -0.86% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.99% | 23 |
| May | +0.86% | 23 |
| Jun | -1.36% | 23 |
| Jul | +1.13% | 23 |
| Aug | -0.81% | 23 |
| Sep | -1.27% | 24 |
| Oct | +2.35% | 23 |
| Nov | +3.08% | 23 |
| Dec | +1.28% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: DIS
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish technical indicators, including MACD and ADX, indicate a weak uptrend.
- Neutral momentum oscillators, such as RSI and Stochastic %K, suggest no clear direction.
- Low volatility levels suggest the stock is less likely to experience sharp movements.
Primary Risks:
- Earnings miss or negative surprise could lead to a decline in price.
- Regulatory issues or changes in the entertainment industry could impact the company's performance.
Investment Thesis: Walt Disney (DIS) appears to be stuck in a neutral zone, with no clear trend emerging. The stock's low volatility and positive earnings expectations suggest it may be due for a breakout or consolidation. Further analysis is needed to determine whether the current price is a good entry point.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been mixed, with both positive and negative sentiment present. The overall tone suggests no clear directional bias.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Weak uptrend (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Neutral trend (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Uptrend (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $94.66
- Middle Bollinger Band: $102.23
- Upper Bollinger Band: $109.80
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (64.40)
- MACD signal: Bullish (2.26 / 0.53 / 1.73)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (neutral)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume trends:
- Short-term: Low volume
- Medium-term: Moderate volume
- Institutional interest signals:
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Positive (9993784.63)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been mixed, with both positive and negative sentiment present.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is neutral, with no clear directional bias emerging.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release may provide a catalyst for the stock's price movement.
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests that the stock's price movement is driven by a mix of technical and fundamental factors, including the company's recent performance and industry trends.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The stock's beta (0.67) suggests it is less volatile than the broader market, with a moderate correlation to the S&P 500.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility level is low, suggesting that the stock may be due for a breakout or consolidation.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: High (86.1%)
- Put/call ratios: Bullish sentiment
- Unusual activity: None
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations suggest that the stock may be less likely to experience sharp declines.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The entertainment sector has been trending upward, with Disney's stock price following a similar path.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest suggests that institutions are positioned for potential gains or losses in the stock.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation to the broader market is moderate (0.33), suggesting it may be influenced by market trends.
Relative Valuation: Disney's valuation appears reasonable, with a price-to-earnings ratio around its historical average.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $94.66
- Middle Bollinger Band: $102.23
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $109.80 (potential upside target)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings release may provide a catalyst for the stock's price movement.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations suggest that investors should be cautious when entering new positions.
Additional Comments The analysis suggests that Walt Disney (DIS) is currently stuck in a neutral zone, with no clear trend emerging. The stock's low volatility and positive earnings expectations suggest it may be due for a breakout or consolidation. Further analysis is needed to determine whether the current price is a good entry point.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | Pre-Market | 6.67% | 5.55% | 0.83x | Within |
| 2025-02-05 | Pre-Market | 6.88% | 2.48% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2025-05-07 | Pre-Market | 6.79% | 10.89% | 1.60x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-06 | Pre-Market | 6.12% | 2.74% | 0.45x | Within |
| 2025-11-13 | Pre-Market | 6.81% | 7.97% | 1.17x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-02 | Pre-Market | 6.46% | 7.22% | 1.12x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-06 | Pre-Market | 6.78% | 7.63% | 1.13x | Exceeded |
| 2026-08-05 | Pre-Market | 6.16% | 3.65% | 0.59x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 13.5
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 32.3%
- Straddle (30D)
- $6.06
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.45
- P/C Volume
- 1.23
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.64
- Correlation (SPY)
- 31.2%
- R²
- 0.10
- Ann. Volatility
- 26.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $630.01M | 21.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Long Focus Capital Management, LLC | $380.28M | 12.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $284.45M | 9.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $228.27M | 7.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $211.87M | 7.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $148.11M | 4.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Concentric Capital Strategies, LP | $133.08M | 4.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $122.15M | 4.10% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $85.64M | 2.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $74.28M | 2.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $63.47M | 2.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $59.34M | 1.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $52.94M | 1.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $51.40M | 1.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $39.30M | 1.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $32.38M | 1.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $32.00M | 1.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | PEAK6 LLC | $29.36M | 0.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $29.25M | 0.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $27.94M | 0.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | MARSHALL WACE, LLP Custodian | $27.07M | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $22.51M | 0.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $19.62M | 0.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Walleye Capital LLC | $18.28M | 0.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Brevan Howard Capital Management LP | $16.76M | 0.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $471.51M | 20.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $382.61M | 16.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $253.65M | 11.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $152.82M | 6.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $122.92M | 5.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $84.81M | 3.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $68.47M | 2.99% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $58.94M | 2.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $57.18M | 2.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $56.59M | 2.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $50.88M | 2.22% | 2025-09-30 |
| 12 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $41.45M | 1.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | CREDIT AGRICOLE S A | $37.83M | 1.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $33.46M | 1.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $30.21M | 1.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $29.43M | 1.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $27.80M | 1.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | MARSHALL WACE, LLP Custodian | $27.07M | 1.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $22.79M | 0.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $20.38M | 0.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $18.82M | 0.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | BARCLAYS PLC Custodian | $18.28M | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $17.28M | 0.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Brevan Howard Capital Management LP | $16.76M | 0.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $16.17M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | BRENT WOODFORD | EVP, Control, Fin Plan & Tax | Mixed | — | $106.17 | -$6.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Paul M Roeder | Sr EVP and Chief Comm Officer | Sell (S) | −3,596 | $106.32 | -$382.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | BRENT WOODFORD | EVP, Control, Fin Plan & Tax | Mixed | — | $105.26 | -$724 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-20 | Paul M Roeder | Sr EVP and Chief Comm Officer | Mixed | +612 | $98.42 | -$33.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-20 | BRENT WOODFORD | EVP, Control, Fin Plan & Tax | Mixed | +800 | $98.42 | -$35.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-20 | Sonia L Coleman | Sr. EVP & Chief People Officer | Mixed | +622 | $98.42 | -$55.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | Paul M Roeder | Sr EVP and Chief Comm Officer | Mixed | +1,996 | $97.00 | -$108.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | BRENT WOODFORD | EVP, Control, Fin Plan & Tax | Mixed | +2,894 | $97.00 | -$90.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Carolyn Everson | Director | Award (A) | +954 | $100.80 | $96.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | CALVIN MCDONALD | Director | Award (A) | +954 | $100.80 | $96.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Jeremy Darroch | Director | Mixed | +841 | $100.38 | $85.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Michael B. G. Froman | Director | Award (A) | +1,004 | $100.80 | $101.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Derica W Rice | Director | Award (A) | +1,023 | $100.80 | $103.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | MARIA ELENA LAGOMASINO | Director | Award (A) | +954 | $100.80 | $96.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | JAMES P GORMAN | Director | Award (A) | +1,364 | $100.80 | $137.5K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROBERT A IGER | Chief Executive Officer | 232,818 | $24.27M | -$418.49M | 38 | 2025-12-17 |
| 2 | Christine M McCarthy | SEVP & Chief Financial Officer | 186,061 | $19.39M | -$22.84M | 24 | 2023-01-13 |
| 3 | ALAN N BRAVERMAN | Sr EVP, General Counsel & Secy | 122,023 | $12.72M | -$37.61M | 18 | 2021-12-23 |
| 4 | BRENT WOODFORD | EVP, Control, Fin Plan & Tax | 66,046 | $6.88M | -$19.45M | 76 | 2026-09-03 |
| 5 | Horacio E Gutierrez | SEVP, CL&GAO | 58,317 | $6.08M | $0 | 10 | 2026-01-20 |
| 6 | JAMES P GORMAN | Director | 48,575 | $5.06M | $4.13M | 12 | 2026-07-02 |
| 7 | SUSAN E ARNOLD | Director | 46,295 | $4.83M | -$1.49M | 19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 8 | MARIA ELENA LAGOMASINO | Director | 37,740 | $3.93M | $0 | 31 | 2026-07-02 |
| 9 | MARK G PARKER | Director | 29,649 | $3.09M | $0 | 25 | 2025-01-02 |
| 10 | CALVIN MCDONALD | Director | 29,589 | $3.08M | $1000.0K | 22 | 2026-07-02 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 | Roeder Paul M | Officer | 3,596 | $382.3K | 2026-08-19 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | WOODFORD BRENT | Officer | 7,238 | $762.2K | 2026-08-14 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-22 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 2,473 | $281.9K | 2026-01-22 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-29 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 2,431 | $277.1K | 2025-12-24 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-25 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 1,971 | $233.7K | 2025-08-25 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-22 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 689 | $74.9K | 2025-01-22 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-17 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 3,078 | $342.8K | 2024-12-17 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-22 | IGER ROBERT A | Officer | 372,412 | $42.67M | 2024-11-22 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-12 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 2,798 | $279.8K | 2024-11-11 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-09 | Coleman Sonia L | Officer | 4,400 | $466.4K | 2024-05-09 | MERRILL LYCNH | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 0001744489-26-000036 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-20 | 0001628280-26-020172 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | 0001193125-26-088356 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-24 | 0001744489-26-000025 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001193125-26-048674 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-03 | 0001744489-26-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | 0001744489-26-000018 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-09 | 0001744489-25-000159 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-13 | 0001744489-25-000154 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-12 | 0001744489-25-000149 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 0001744489-26-000037 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | 0001744489-26-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | 0001744489-25-000136 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-07 | 0001744489-25-000098 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-05 | 0001744489-25-000067 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-07 | 0001744489-24-000232 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-07 | 0001744489-24-000152 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-07 | 0001744489-24-000081 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-09 | 0001744489-23-000171 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-10 | 0001744489-23-000099 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 21.5 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.6 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.6 |
| TTM Revenue | $98.9B |
| TTM Net Income | $8.6B |
| TTM EPS | $4.85 |
| ROE | 7.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.42 |