FITBP Fifth Third Bancorp Depositary Shares each representing 1/40th share of Fifth Third 6.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class B Preferred Stock, Series A
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS (6022)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 18,676
- List Date
- 2019-08-27
- CIK
- 0000035527
- Headquarters
- Cincinnati, OH
- Homepage
- https://www.53.com
Fifth Third Bancorp is a midsize regional bank in the US, with total assets of around $300 billion as of March 2026. The bank closed its acquisition of Comercia in February 2026. Headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, Fifth Third has a strong presence in the US Midwest and is currently expanding in the US Southeast. The bank provides a diversified set of financial services in retail banking, commercial banking, card and Treasury management, wealth and asset management, and capital markets.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for FITBP:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Recent news headlines and sentiment have been mixed, with a focus on macroeconomic trends and market commentary. Technical indicators suggest the stock is trading within a range.
Primary Risks: Earnings miss or negative surprises could lead to a price drop. Volatility remains relatively low, but unexpected market movements could impact the stock's performance.
Investment Thesis: FITBP appears to be stuck in a range-bound environment, with no clear catalysts driving significant price moves. A successful earnings report and positive news sentiment could lead to an upward breakout.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent headlines have been largely neutral or positive, which has helped support the stock's current level.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Range-bound; Medium-term (1-3 months): Uptrend; Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $23.90
- Middle Bollinger Band: $23.59
- Lower Bollinger Band: $23.29
- SMA 20: $23.59
- EMA 26: $23.62
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 45.77 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.05 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: -0.04 (bearish)
- Stochastic %K: 34.06
- Stochastic %D: 34.91
- Williams %R: -74.19
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 10026.35; On-Balance Volume (OBV): 301054.89; Volume Rate of Change: -69.39%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive headlines: FITBP's investment thesis and positive sentiment
- Neutral headlines: Market commentary and macroeconomic trends
- Negative headlines: None significant
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, with a focus on market commentary.
Catalyst Identification: No significant earnings announcements or product launches in the near term.
Market Narrative: The recent news sentiment has been supportive of the stock's current level, which suggests a lack of catalysts driving significant price movements.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta 0.23 (vs SPY) indicates low risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Historical volatility remains relatively low at 11.1%, indicating stable price action.
Options Market Signals: IV rank: N/A; Put/call ratios: N/A; Unusual activity: None significant
Downside Protection: Support levels include the lower Bollinger Band ($23.29) and SMA 20 ($23.59).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: FITBP is trading in line with its sector, with no significant outperformance or underperformance.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest appears to be waning, as volume indicators suggest a lack of buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's price movement is highly correlated with the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: FITBP appears to be trading within its historical range, suggesting no significant undervaluation or overvaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $23.29
- SMA 20: $23.59
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None significant
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcements and product launches in the near term are potential catalysts.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels around the lower Bollinger Band ($23.29) and SMA 20 ($23.59).
Please let me know if this meets your expectations!
FITBP Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
FITBP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $7.54M | 44.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $6.46M | 37.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.03M | 17.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $9.01M | 62.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.76M | 32.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $738.45K | 5.09% | 2026-06-30 |
FITBP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-05-11| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | Mitchell Stuart Feiger | Director | Sell (S) | −82,045 | $54.68 | -$4.49M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-29 | Peter L Sefzik | EVP | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $50.46 | -$1.01M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | Eileen A Mallesch | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | C. Bryan Daniels | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Linda W Clement-Holmes | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Katherine H. Blackburn | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Ven Michael G Van de | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Kathleen A Rogers | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Gary R. Heminger | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Derek J Kerr | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Barbara Smith | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Laurent Desmangles | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Nicholas K Akins | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Evan Bayh | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-23 | Jorge L. Benitez | Director | Award (A) | +2,838 | — | EDGAR |
FITBP Insider Holdings
33 insiders · @ $23.52| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Timothy Spence | Chair, CEO & President | 599,794 | $14.11M | -$3.12M | 51 | 2026-02-23 |
| 2 | C. Bryan Daniels | Director | 395,927 | $9.31M | $1.50M | 10 | 2026-04-23 |
| 3 | James C. Leonard | EVP & Chief Operating Officer | 288,017 | $6.77M | -$3.81M | 61 | 2026-02-23 |
| 4 | Robert P Shaffer | EVP and Chief Risk Officer | 226,238 | $5.32M | -$2.57M | 42 | 2026-02-23 |
| 5 | Peter L Sefzik | EVP | 208,884 | $4.91M | -$1.01M | 2 | 2026-04-29 |
| 6 | Gary R. Heminger | Director | 177,140 | $4.17M | $1.27M | 19 | 2026-04-23 |
| 7 | Jude Schramm | EVP & CIO | 156,356 | $3.68M | -$2.17M | 31 | 2026-02-25 |
| 8 | Kevin P Lavender | EVP | 152,556 | $3.59M | -$3.37M | 34 | 2025-02-21 |
| 9 | Katherine H. Blackburn | Director | 146,396 | $3.44M | $993.7K | 13 | 2026-04-23 |
| 10 | Thomas H Harvey | Director | 128,441 | $3.02M | -$1.52M | 13 | 2025-04-17 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF | Nport | 0.10% | $453,845 | — | 2026-10-31 |
| 2 | JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF | Nport | 0.15% | $312,421 | — | 2027-03-31 |
| 3 | GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $90,306 | — | 2026-08-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.