HBIO Harvard Bioscience Inc
XNAS
7.48
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $3.95 – $9.40
- YTD
- +14.74%
- Straddle Price
- $3.67
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.10
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Open
- $8.17
- Day Range
- $8.17 – $8.40
- Volume
- 24,338
- Prev Close
- $8.23
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.25 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.91% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.17% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | -26.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj -25bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +10.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -140.4% |
| Book / Price | 19.9% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 58.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -1.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 4.94 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $8.00 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $8.26 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 101.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $8.00 | 100% | stability 67% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- LABORATORY ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS (3826) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 339
- List Date
- 2000-12-07
- CIK
- 0001123494
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-05 (After-Close)
- Headquarters
- Holliston, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.harvardbioscience.com
Harvard Bioscience Inc is a developer, manufacturer, and seller of technologies, products, and services that enable advances in life science applications, including research, drug and therapy discovery, bioproduction, and preclinical testing. The company organizes its product line into two product families: Cellular and Molecular Technologies (CMT) and Preclinical. The CMT product family supports molecular, cellular, organ, and organoid research, as well as bioproduction and in vitro testing, while the Preclinical product family provides products for preclinical research and testing, including…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 9.95% | -18.49% | 11.19% | -18.37% | -15.76% | -23.16% | -9.11% |
| Feb | -9.48% | -9.70% | -6.29% | -4.20% | -48.88% | 22.20% | -9.39% |
| Mar | 23.53% | 13.32% | 54.41% | -2.53% | -30.98% | -17.60% | 6.69% |
| Apr | 27.39% | -16.21% | 36.52% | -10.33% | -39.61% | 25.34% | 3.85% |
| May | 0.29% | -33.82% | -6.05% | -17.02% | 37.31% | -7.55% | -4.47% |
| Jun | 14.11% | 1.12% | -3.51% | -10.38% | 9.47% | -3.91% | 1.15% |
| Jul | -4.25% | 1.62% | -15.91% | 15.11% | 3.86% | 0.33% | 0.13% |
| Aug | 3.38% | -11.53% | -2.43% | -6.49% | 13.51% | 28.53% | 4.16% |
| Sep | -15.80% | -20.50% | -2.49% | -0.74% | -10.36% | -1.49% | -8.56% |
| Oct | 6.66% | 1.51% | 3.05% | -7.48% | 15.36% | 2.34%* | 3.57% |
| Nov | -9.23% | -7.25% | 2.40% | -8.33% | 32.58% | -- | 2.03% |
| Dec | 10.68% | 0.00% | 21.59% | -4.09% | -12.63% | -- | 3.11% |
| Total | 60.08% | -68.53% | 104.39% | -55.82% | -61.90% | 12.00% | -1.63% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: HBIO
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Negative beta (-1.72) indicating stock moves opposite to market
- Volatility regime is high (15.24), increasing risk
- Recent news headlines are mixed, with a focus on earnings and management changes
Primary Risks:
- High volatility regime, increasing risk of significant price movements
- Negative correlation with the market, potentially leading to increased losses
- Earnings misses or guidance disappointments could exacerbate bearish sentiment
Investment Thesis: HBIO's recent performance has been characterized by high volatility and a negative beta. While earnings have been strong, the stock's behavior suggests a potential correction is underway. Investors should exercise caution when considering HBIO, as the risks outweigh the potential rewards.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: NEUTRAL
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Downtrend Medium-term (1-3 months): Weak trend Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($4.67)
- Previous resistance level ($6.01)
Momentum Signals: RSI: 50.15 (neutral) MACD: Bullish crossover (-0.06 / Signal: -0.12 / Histogram: 0.06)
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 31663.15 On-Balance Volume (OBV): 94184932.97
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are mixed, with a focus on earnings and management changes. While the company has reported strong revenue growth, there is no clear catalyst to drive the stock higher.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL Catalyst Identification: Earnings and product launches
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests that HBIO's recent performance is driven by earnings and management changes, rather than a specific catalyst or trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk due to negative correlation with the market (-1.72)
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime (15.24), increasing risk
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: 33.6% (Medium) Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.02 (Bullish sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations are crucial to mitigate potential losses.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market is neutral
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest are low
Correlation Analysis: HBIO's correlation with the market is negative (-0.01), increasing risk
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with potential for a correction or breakout.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support levels: $4.67 (Lower Bollinger Band) and $5.71 (SMA 50) Resistance level: $6.01 (Previous resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical breakdown below $4.67 could lead to increased losses
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings and product launches could drive the stock higher or lower, respectively.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations are crucial to manage risk effectively.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news headlines, and risk metrics, it is clear that HBIO's recent performance has been characterized by high volatility and a negative beta. While earnings have been strong, the stock's behavior suggests a potential correction is underway. Investors should exercise caution when considering HBIO, as the risks outweigh the potential rewards.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-06 | After-Close | 1.43% | 0.14% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2021-08-05 | After-Close | 3.31% | 0.88% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2024-01-05 | After-Close | 37.34% | 2.47% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 18.11% | 1.87% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 54.05% | 6.73% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 96.23% | 7.53% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2025-03-12 | After-Close | 350.00% | 6.55% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-05-12 | After-Close | 738.13% | 5.25% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-08-11 | After-Close | 20.87% | 0.73% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | After-Close | 22.73% | 0.49% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-02-10 | After-Close | 26.67% | 9.52% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2026-05-12 | After-Close | 124.77% | 2.87% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-08-11 | After-Close | 109.71% | 0.65% | 0.01x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
HBIO Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 63rd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $611K | #2529 of 3138 | -2.1% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $201K | #3492 of 3716 | -29.6% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $81K | #5867 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
HBIO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $14.14K | 73.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $5.10K | 26.51% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
HBIO Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-12| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-12 | Katherine A. Eade | Director | Award (A) | +16,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Robert E. Gagnon | Director | Award (A) | +16,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Stephen J Denelsky | Director | Award (A) | +16,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Seth Benjamin Benson | Director | Award (A) | +16,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | William Snider | Director | Award (A) | +16,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Mark T Frost | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $5.00 | $25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | Mark T Frost | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +30,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-23 | John D Duke | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +75,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-18 | William Snider | Director | Buy (P) | +21,000 | $4.93 | $103.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-18 | Stephen J Denelsky | Director | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $4.87 | $48.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | John D Duke | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $5.01 | $25.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-30 | William Snider | Director | Award (A) | +110,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-07 | Stephen J Denelsky | Director | Award (A) | +110,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-19 | James W Green | Director | Mixed | −392,522 | $0.53 | -$23.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-11 | John D Duke | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +1,000,000 | — | EDGAR |
HBIO Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $8.32| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James W Green | Chief Executive Officer | 406,278 | $3.38M | -$504.3K | 57 | 2025-08-19 |
| 2 | John D Duke | Chief Executive Officer | 180,000 | $1.50M | $25.1K | 3 | 2026-03-23 |
| 3 | Katherine A. Eade | Director | 58,669 | $488.1K | $98.8K | 19 | 2026-06-12 |
| 4 | William Snider | Director | 48,556 | $404.0K | $103.6K | 3 | 2026-06-11 |
| 5 | Mark T Frost | Chief Financial Officer | 47,500 | $395.2K | $25.0K | 3 | 2026-04-01 |
| 6 | Stephen J Denelsky | Director | 37,556 | $312.5K | $48.7K | 3 | 2026-06-11 |
| 7 | Robert E. Gagnon | Chief Financial Officer | 27,556 | $229.3K | -$2.37M | 26 | 2026-06-11 |
| 8 | Seth Benjamin Benson | Director | 27,556 | $229.3K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-11 |
| 9 | Jennifer Cote | Chief Financial Officer | 15,902 | $132.3K | $0 | 5 | 2025-03-21 |
HBIO Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 12, 2026Directors 6
- Katherine A. Eade · since Oct 24, 2017
- John D Duke · since Jun 2, 2025
- Seth Benjamin Benson · since Jul 16, 2025
- Robert E. Gagnon · listed since Jul 2025
- Stephen J Denelsky · since Sep 5, 2025
- William Snider · since Dec 17, 2025
Officers 2
- John D Duke · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Aug 2025
- Mark T Frost · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Apr 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (33)
| Apr 1, 2026 | Mark T Frost listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Interim CFO) in SEC filings |
| Dec 17, 2025 | William Snider became a director |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Stephen J Denelsky became a director |
| Aug 19, 2025 | James W Green reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 19, 2025 | James W Green reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer |
| Aug 11, 2025 | John D Duke first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 18, 2025 | Robert E. Gagnon no longer listed as Chief Financial Officer in SEC filings |
| Jul 18, 2025 | Robert E. Gagnon first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 16, 2025 | Seth Benjamin Benson became a director |
| Jun 10, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Alan I Edrick from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 2, 2025 | John D Duke became a director |
| May 30, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Thomas W Loewald from the board in an SEC filing |
| May 12, 2025 | Mark T Frost became Interim CFO |
| Apr 10, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Bertrand Loy from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 7, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Jennifer Cote as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 7, 2024 | Jennifer Cote no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Jennifer Cote listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Interim CFO) in SEC filings |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Jennifer Cote first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2023 | Jennifer Cote became Interim CFO |
| Dec 7, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Michael A. Rossi as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 24, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Kenneth Fletcher Olson as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 5, 2021 | Kenneth Fletcher Olson listed as Chief Operating Officer (previously Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Apr 6, 2020 | Susan M. Steele became a director |
| Nov 1, 2019 | Kenneth Fletcher Olson became Vice President |
| Oct 31, 2019 | Yash Singh became Executive Vice President |
| Sep 3, 2019 | Alan I Edrick became a director |
| Jul 18, 2019 | Michael A. Rossi became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 9, 2019 | Jeffrey Duchemin reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 9, 2019 | Jeffrey Duchemin reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer |
| Jul 9, 2019 | James W Green first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Nov 26, 2018 | Kamalam Unninayar became Chief Financial Officer |
| Oct 24, 2017 | Thomas W Loewald became a director |
| Oct 24, 2017 | Katherine A. Eade became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (8)
- John F Kennedy · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 26, 2021
- Susan M. Steele · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 6, 2021
- Yash Singh · Last reported as Executive Vice President in an SEC filing dated Nov 5, 2019
- Kamalam Unninayar · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2019
- Yong Sun · Last reported as VP - Commercial Operations in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2019
- George Uveges · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 15, 2018
- Earl R Lewis · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2018
- David Green · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 10, 2017
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $977,882 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $352,305 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $15,653 | $2.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $13,366 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 5 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $10,115 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 6 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $8,469 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 7 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $7,637 | — | 2026-10-23 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $22.73M | $-2.91M | $-0.64 | $325.00K |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $20.75M | $-3.42M | $-0.77 | $-662.00K |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $23.73M | $-2.85M | $-0.60 | $-96.00K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $20.59M | $-1.23M | $-0.30 | $1.08M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $20.45M | $-2.28M | $-0.52 | $2.75M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $21.77M | $-50.34M | $-11.42 | $2.99M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $24.56M | $18.00K | $0.10 | $1.73M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $21.97M | $-4.80M | $-1.10 | $-842.00K |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $23.10M | $-2.93M | $-0.70 | $-846.00K |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $24.51M | $-4.69M | $-1.10 | $1.40M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $28.15M | $-1.82M | $-0.40 | $4.30M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $25.36M | $-1.24M | $-0.30 | $4.36M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.