IBMV iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Muni Bond ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMV) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2026-03-25
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.18% prospectus, filed Feb 23, 2026
- Assets
- $8.7M SEC filing, Jul 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.41% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $534K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 316 top 10 are 11.5%
- Listed
- Mar 25, 2026 Cboe BZX
Moves with. Long Treasuries (14% of its variance, beta 0.13); Gold (12% of its variance, beta 0.05); US large-cap stocks (7% of its variance, beta 0.06); Small caps over large (4% of its variance, beta 0.06). These factors explain 31% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Stated objective. The iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Muni Bond ETF (the Fund ) seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2033. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 316 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Target Maturity Muni ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$5.0M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$5.0M +57.8% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- —
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$5.0M |
| Jun 2026 | $0 |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | +$1.3M |
| Mar 2026 | +$2.5M |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 6 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $682M | −0.8% | compare |
| IBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $681M | −1.4% | compare |
| IBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.10% | $530M | 0.0% | compare |
| IBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.18% | $494M | −2.4% | compare |
| BSMRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | — | 0.18% | $359M | −1.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Target Maturity Muni category.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-06 | $0.0547 | CD |
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.0554 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.0413 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.0614 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.0604 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-06 | $0.0676 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Huron Valley School District/MI | 2.02% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 1.87% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Connecticut Special Tax Revenue | 1.38% | Debt | US |
| — | Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board | 1.01% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. | 0.97% | Debt | US |
| — | Orange County School Board | 0.96% | Debt | US |
| — | Manatee County School District | 0.88% | Debt | US |
| — | City of New York | 0.86% | Debt | US |
| — | State of California | 0.77% | Debt | US |
| — | Energy Northwest | 0.76% | Debt | US |
| — | Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District | 0.75% | Debt | US |
| — | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Sales Tax | 0.75% | Debt | US |
| — | City of New York | 0.75% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Chicago IL Waterworks Revenue | 0.75% | Debt | US |
| — | Rio Hondo Community College District | 0.68% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Vermont | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | Johnson County Unified School District No. 229 Blue Valley | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | University of Arkansas | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | California State Public Works Board | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Boston | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Chicago Wastewater Transmission | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Maryland | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Denton | 0.56% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue | 0.56% | Debt | US |
| — | Michigan Finance Authority | 0.51% | Debt | US |
| — | Purdue University | 0.51% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp. | 0.51% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority | 0.51% | Debt | US |
| — | Lamar Consolidated Independent School District | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | Board of Governors of Colorado State University System | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Dormitory Authority | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Miami-Dade | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | City of New York | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Unified School District | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | City of West Des Moines | 0.47% | Debt | US |
| — | Cerritos Community College District | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Pima | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Community College District | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | Omaha Public Power District | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Loudoun | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Dormitory Authority | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Philadelphia | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | Trinity River Authority | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | Intermountain Power Agency | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Washington | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | Alameda Unified School District-Alameda County | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 98.22% | $8.5M | 315 |
| Short-term investment | 0.17% | $14561 | 1 |
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | 0.64% | 0.64% |
| Apr | 0.66% | 0.66% |
| May | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Jun | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Jul | -1.85% | -1.85% |
| Aug | -0.06% | -0.06% |
| Sep | -3.46% | -3.46% |
| Oct | 0.21%* | 0.21% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -3.38% | -3.38% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
IBMV Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 135
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
IBMV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|