GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
LRHC La Rosa Holding Corp. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
LRHC
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE AGENTS & MANAGERS (FOR OTHERS) (6531) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 43
- List Date
- 2023-10-10
- CIK
- 0001879403
- Headquarters
- Celebration, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.larosaholdings.com
La Rosa Holdings Corp operates in the U.S. residential real estate market. It is a holding company for agent-centric, technology-integrated, cloud-based, multi-service real estate companies. The company's business is organized based on the services it provides internally to the agents and to the public, which are residential and commercial real estate brokerage, franchising, real estate brokerage education and coaching, and property management. The company has six reportable segments, namely: Real Estate Brokerage Services (Residential), Franchising Services, Coaching Services, Property Manage…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 8.66% | -47.34% | -57.10% | -31.93% |
| Feb | -- | 2.34% | -47.56% | -56.73% | -33.98% |
| Mar | -- | -9.29% | -10.80% | -46.45% | -22.18% |
| Apr | -- | -4.07% | -22.03% | -67.88% | -31.33% |
| May | -- | -32.91% | -5.35% | -30.69% | -22.98% |
| Jun | -- | 70.16% | 3.65% | -7.94% | 21.96% |
| Jul | -- | -33.15% | -52.51% | -16.24% | -33.97% |
| Aug | -- | -16.24% | 30.18% | -42.82% | -9.63% |
| Sep | -- | -34.26% | 21.49% | -8.57% | -7.11% |
| Oct | -63.43% | 18.70% | -20.62% | -58.81%* | -31.04% |
| Nov | 105.18% | -14.15% | -65.17% | -- | 8.62% |
| Dec | -26.82% | 19.77% | -66.10% | -- | -24.38% |
| Total | -45.09% | -50.37% | -98.67% | -99.63% | -73.44% |
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.78
SMA 50: $2.62
SMA 200: $53.90
Current: $0.76
EMA 12: $1.31
EMA 26: $1.87
MACD: -0.5599 | Signal: -0.0475
BEARISH
ADX (14): 42.41
STRONG TREND
+DI: 10.12
−DI: 44.94
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 16.65
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 0.63
Stoch %D: 1.69
Williams %R: -98.31
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $3.09
BB Lower: $0.46
NEUTRAL
OBV: -22,193,945
Vol SMA 20: 850,326
Vol ROC: 6651.14%
ATR: $0.22
True Range: $0.17
HV 20: 125.8%
HV 30: 128.6%
HV 60: 121.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: LRHC
Executive Summary: This report presents a comprehensive analysis of LRHC, assessing its technical indicators, news sentiment, and risk metrics.
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical indicators point to a bearish trend
- Recent negative news headlines outweigh positive ones
- High volatility and beta indicate increased risk
Investment Thesis: LRHC's recent price action is driven by bearish momentum, with the stock struggling to break above key resistance levels. The company's pivot towards AI infrastructure and data centers may not be enough to offset concerns about its cash burn reduction and unaudited preliminary revenue growth.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The news headlines suggest a mixed bag of positive and negative sentiment, but the overall tone is bearish. The recent EXCLUSIVE articles from Benzinga highlight La Rosa's pivot towards AI infrastructure, which may not be enough to offset concerns about its cash burn reduction.
Technical Analysis:
- Trend Direction: Bearish (Short-term), Neutral (Medium-term), Downtrend (Long-term)
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key resistance at $1.46, support at $0.90
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30) with a neutral reading of 33.27
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover (-0.34 / Signal: 0.10 / Histogram: -0.45)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (touching upper band)
- Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 is trending downward, indicating decreased institutional interest
News & Sentiment Analysis:
- Recent Headlines Summary: Mixed bag of positive and negative news headlines
- Sentiment Assessment: Bearish overall sentiment with a mix of neutral and negative news articles
- Catalyst Identification: None notable in the recent news headlines
- Market Narrative: La Rosa's pivot towards AI infrastructure may not be enough to offset concerns about its cash burn reduction
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
- Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5)
- Volatility Regime: High volatility with a stock volatility of 1.63
- Options Market Signals: No options data available
- Downside Protection: Support levels at $0.90 and key resistance at $1.46
Market Context & Positioning:
- Sector Performance: La Rosa is underperforming its sector peers
- Institutional Activity: Decreased institutional interest, as indicated by the volume SMA 20 trend
- Correlation Analysis: LRHC has a low correlation with market (R-squared interpretation)
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range
Key Levels & Action Items:
- Critical Price Levels: Support at $0.90 and key resistance at $1.46
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None notable in the recent price action
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates or product launches may provide a catalyst for change
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set below $0.90, with position sizing considerations based on volatility and risk tolerance
This analysis provides a comprehensive review of LRHC's technical indicators, news sentiment, and risk metrics. The report highlights the bearish trend direction, mixed bag of positive and negative news headlines, and high volatility, indicating increased risk.
Generated
News
All LRHC news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·6mo ago
BenzingaT3·7mo ago
BenzingaT3·8mo ago
BenzingaT3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·9mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·9mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·10mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·14mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·14mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
LRHC Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.7034
Alpha: -785.23%
Correlation: 0.1647
R-Squared: 2.7%
Stock Volatility: 132.3%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 245
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 245
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own LRHC
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $13K | #6217 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
LRHC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
LRHC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-03-03Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | +6,216 | $1.08 | $6.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Deana La Rosa | Chief Operating Officer | Mixed | −400 | $1000.00 | -$400.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-19 | Joseph La Rosa | CEO, interim CFO | Award (A) | +380,044 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-18 | Michael A La Rosa | Director | Award (A) | +600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-18 | Siamack Alavi | Director | Award (A) | +600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-18 | Ned L Siegel | Director | Award (A) | +600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-18 | Lourdes Felix | Director | Award (A) | +600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-23 | Alex Santos | CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER | Sell (S) | −26 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-21 | Deana La Rosa | Chief Operating Officer | Buy (P) | +300,000 | $7.64 | $2.29M | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-23 | Joseph La Rosa | CEO, interim CFO | Award (A) | +13,189,436 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-06 | Alex Santos | CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER | Exer (M) | +4,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-06 | Joseph La Rosa | CEO, interim CFO | Mixed | +12,347,748 | $1.05 | $645.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-04 | Alex Santos | CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER | Award (A) | +4,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Deana La Rosa | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +800,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-31 | Deana La Rosa | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +800,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
LRHC Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $0.76
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | 949 | $719 | $6.5K | 1 | 2026-03-03 |
| 2 | Joseph La Rosa | CEO, interim CFO | 504 | $382 | $0 | 12 | 2025-08-19 |
| 3 | Deana La Rosa | Chief Operating Officer | 33 | $25 | $2.29M | 4 | 2026-01-12 |
| 4 | Ned L Siegel | Director | 1 | $1 | $0 | 2 | 2025-08-18 |
| 5 | Lourdes Felix | Director | 1 | $1 | $0 | 1 | 2025-08-18 |
| 6 | Michael A La Rosa | Director | 1 | $1 | $0 | 2 | 2025-08-18 |
| 7 | Siamack Alavi | Director | 1 | $1 | $0 | 1 | 2025-08-18 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
LRHC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 30, 2026Directors 6
- Joseph La Rosa · since Oct 4, 2023
- Ned L Siegel · since Oct 4, 2023
- Lourdes Felix · since Apr 19, 2024
- Nicholas H Adler · since Dec 29, 2025
- Jaime Jose Cosculluela · since Feb 10, 2026
- Marc Oren Urbach · since Sep 24, 2026
Officers 3
- Joseph La Rosa · CEO, interim CFO · listed since Dec 2024
- Deana La Rosa · Chief Operating Officer · since Feb 1, 2024
- Alex Santos · Chief Technology Officer · since Oct 4, 2023
10% owners 1
- Joseph La Rosa · since Oct 4, 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (25)
| Sep 24, 2026 | Marc Oren Urbach became a director |
| Mar 3, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 10, 2026 | Jaime Jose Cosculluela became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Michael A La Rosa from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 29, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Siamack Alavi from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 29, 2025 | Nicholas H Adler became a director |
| Dec 6, 2024 | Joseph La Rosa listed as CEO, interim CFO (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Oct 4, 2024 | Siamack Alavi became a director |
| Sep 30, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Kent Metzroth as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 30, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Jodi R White from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 19, 2024 | Lourdes Felix became a director |
| Apr 17, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Thomas Stringer from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Deana La Rosa became Chief Operating Officer |
| Oct 16, 2023 | Joseph La Rosa listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously President, CEO, and Chairman) in SEC filings |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Thomas Stringer became a director |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Ned L Siegel became a director |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Michael A La Rosa became a director |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Kent Metzroth became Chief Financial Officer |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Joseph La Rosa became a director |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Joseph La Rosa became a 10% owner |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Joseph La Rosa became President, CEO, and Chairman |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Jodi R White became a director |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Carlos J. Bonilla became a 10% owner |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Alex Santos became Chief Technology Officer |
Not reported recently (1)
- Carlos J. Bonilla · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 10, 2023
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
LRHC Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2024-09-10
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | SANTOS ALEX | Officer | 9,611 | $8.2K | 2024-09-10 | Charles Schwab Corp. | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.