MBOT Microbot Medical, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
3.50
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
MBOT
$3.50
—
Key stats
$3.50
Pre-market
$0.94
+0.35%
- 52-Week Range
- $0.93 – $2.85
- YTD
- +65.88%
- Straddle Price
- $4.12
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Open
- $0.98
- Day Range
- $0.94 – $1.00
- Volume
- 485,326
- Prev Close
- $0.97
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.35 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.36% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 12.37% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +275.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -23.7% |
| Book / Price | 159.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 1.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -17075.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.28 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.04 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 3550.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: INGN, MYGN, OSUR, PCRX
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
95%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 25, 2026
$0.96
α +1.8%
rank 86%
conviction
86%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 24, 2026
$0.98
α +4.0%
rank 86%
conviction
96%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 22, 2027
$0.99
α +5.0%
rank 81%
conviction
95%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $2.18 | 16% | median 1.5× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.00 | 16% | median 1.3× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.28 | 69% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 22
- List Date
- 1992-03-25
- CIK
- 0000883975
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-11
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.08) (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Hingham, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.microbotmedical.com
Microbot Medical Inc is a medical device company specializing in the research, design, and development of next-generation robotic endoluminal surgery devices targeting the minimally invasive surgery space. Using its LIBERTY technological platform, the company has developed the LIBERTY Endovascular Robotic Surgical System, a fully disposable robot for various endovascular interventional procedures. The company has a single operating and reportable segment, which is the development of robotic devices for endoluminal surgery.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 19.13% | -23.80% | -2.81% | -3.01% | 61.40% | -14.69% | 6.04% |
| Feb | -2.95% | -8.76% | -8.68% | -0.78% | -22.10% | 35.39% | -1.31% |
| Mar | 0.24% | 11.96% | -25.71% | -5.38% | 11.03% | -2.82% | -1.78% |
| Apr | -10.89% | -6.37% | -27.88% | -30.64% | 65.77% | -11.81% | -3.64% |
| May | 4.49% | -0.17% | 39.01% | 4.17% | 4.96% | -3.33% | 8.19% |
| Jun | 4.75% | -11.55% | 25.93% | -26.09% | -5.62% | -1.52% | -2.35% |
| Jul | -10.86% | -0.20% | -18.03% | -0.99% | 1.61% | -11.86% | -6.72% |
| Aug | 5.85% | -0.07% | -9.88% | -9.51% | 49.41% | -15.82% | 3.33% |
| Sep | -5.76% | -2.85% | -36.53% | 2.97% | -18.67% | -18.37% | -13.20% |
| Oct | 1.97% | -17.56% | -11.76% | 8.20% | -29.43% | -21.52%* | -11.68% |
| Nov | -30.49% | 22.97% | 6.33% | 2.97% | 14.15% | -- | 3.19% |
| Dec | 47.93% | -34.42% | 27.13% | 12.00% | -11.50% | -- | 8.23% |
| Total | 5.39% | -58.55% | -53.45% | -44.02% | 101.79% | -55.21% | -17.34% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.04
SMA 50: $1.28
SMA 200: $1.87
Current: $0.94
EMA 12: $0.99
EMA 26: $1.10
MACD: -0.1067 | Signal: 0.0070
BEARISH
ADX (14): 56.06
STRONG TREND
+DI: 11.86
−DI: 27.66
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 23.00
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 9.61
Stoch %D: 7.80
Williams %R: -94.91
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.24
BB Lower: $0.85
NEUTRAL
OBV: 127,734,252
Vol SMA 20: 748,525
Vol ROC: 10.37%
ATR: $0.06
True Range: $0.06
HV 20: 45.2%
HV 30: 41.3%
HV 60: 52.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: MBOT
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD signal with a strong histogram indicating a potential sell signal.
- High volatility, which can lead to increased market uncertainty and potential price swings.
Primary Risks:
- Potential for further price declines due to the bearish momentum indicators.
- High beta and volatility may amplify any negative news or market movements.
Investment Thesis: MBOT's technical signals suggest a near-term decline, driven by the strong bearish MACD signal. The high volatility and beta may exacerbate this trend, making it essential for investors to consider risk management strategies.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news headlines may be overshadowed by the bearish momentum indicators, leading to potential market skepticism regarding MBOT's prospects.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Downtrend; Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound; Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels from moving averages:
- SMA 20: $1.86
- SMA 50: $2.02
- Technical patterns:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.04
- Middle Bollinger Band: $1.86
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.68
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation (oversold <30): 45.87 (neutral)
- MACD signal (bearish crossover): -0.05 / Signal: 0.01 / Histogram: -0.06 (bearish)
- Bollinger Bands position (squeeze, breakout, mean reversion): Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 1351005.72
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 149749713.01
- Volume Rate of Change: 25.75%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines regarding MBOT's operational and commercial stability, as well as the company's continued growth.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is POSITIVE.
Catalyst Identification: No recent or upcoming catalysts that could significantly impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: The positive news may not be enough to overcome the bearish momentum indicators, leading to a potential market correction.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to the market (beta >1.8).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 65.2% (Medium - shows if volatility is historically high/low)
- Current IV: 224.9%
- Expected Move: $0.52 (25 DTE), 7-DTE: $0.52
- Volume Flow: 220 calls vs 147 puts
- Open Interest: 3,560 calls vs 1,667 puts
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.67 (Bullish sentiment)
- Put/Call OI Ratio: 0.47
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations:
- Critical price levels:
- SMA 20: $1.86
- SMA 50: $2.02
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.04
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.68
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market:
- Sector performance: MBOT is outperforming its peers.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest:
- Institutional activity is moderate, with a put/call volume ratio of 0.67 (bullish sentiment).
Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation):
- Correlation: 0.29
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range:
- MBOT's valuation is relatively high compared to its peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.86
- SMA 50: $2.02
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.04
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.68
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
- Above the upper Bollinger Band: Bullish breakout
- Below the lower Bollinger Band: Bearish breakdown
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, FDA approvals, product launches:
- No upcoming catalysts.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Consider setting a stop-loss around $1.80 to limit potential losses.
- Position sizing should be adjusted based on individual risk tolerance.
Generated
News
All MBOT news →
MBOT Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $4.12
7-DTE Move: $4.12
Days to Exp: 25 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 5
Put Volume: 0
P/C Volume: —
BULLISH
Call OI: 32
Put OI: 0
P/C OI: —
Total OI: 32
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $2.50
ATM Put: $1.62
Call %: 71.4%
Put %: 46.4%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 757
Chain OI: 22,852
Last Updated: 10/26/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 39th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
39%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.80
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.75
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.83
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.75: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.83: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 4 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · ATM 316.8% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$4.12Oct 26
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.6600
Alpha: -93.91%
Correlation: 0.3112
R-Squared: 9.7%
Stock Volatility: 68.0%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MBOT
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $168K | #3526 of 3716 | -81.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MBOT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 49,382,951 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
3 filers$682.39K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $335.68K | 49.19% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $180.38K | 26.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $166.34K | 24.38% | 2026-06-30 |
3 filers$383.04K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $245.12K | 63.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $75.52K | 19.72% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $62.40K | 16.29% | 2026-06-30 |
MBOT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-04-03Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-03 | Prattipati Laxminarain | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-03 | Aileen Ptucha Stockburger | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-03 | Martin J. Madden | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-03 | Tal Baruch Wenderow | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-03 | David James Wilson | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-03 | Scott R Burell | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Harel Gadot | Chairman, President and CEO | Grant (A) | +480,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Juan Diaz-Cartelle | Chief Medical Officer | Grant (A) | +105,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Rachel Vaknin | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +105,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Simon Sharon | General Manager, CTO | Grant (A) | +105,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-07 | Simon Sharon | General Manager, CTO | Grant (A) | +52,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-07 | Harel Gadot | Chairman, President and CEO | Grant (A) | +240,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-07 | Rachel Vaknin | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +52,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-02-07 | Juan Diaz-Cartelle | Chief Medical Officer | Grant (A) | +52,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-30 | Scott R Burell | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
MBOT Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $0.94
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harel Gadot | Chairman, President and CEO | 136,847 | $128.9K | -$400.0K | 9 | 2026-02-20 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
MBOT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Apr 3, 2026Directors 7
- Harel Gadot · since Nov 28, 2016
- Scott R Burell · since Nov 28, 2016
- Martin J. Madden · since Jan 6, 2017
- Prattipati Laxminarain · since Dec 6, 2017
- Aileen Ptucha Stockburger · since Apr 1, 2020
- Tal Baruch Wenderow · since Aug 1, 2020
- David James Wilson · since Dec 17, 2024
Officers 4
- Harel Gadot · Chairman, President and CEO · listed since Sep 2017
- Rachel Vaknin · Chief Financial Officer · since Apr 1, 2022
- Juan Diaz-Cartelle · Chief Medical Officer · since Dec 1, 2023
- Simon Sharon · General Manager, CTO · since Apr 7, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (31)
| Dec 17, 2024 | David James Wilson became a director |
| Dec 1, 2023 | Juan Diaz-Cartelle became Chief Medical Officer |
| Aug 29, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Eyal Morag as Chief Medical Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 1, 2022 | Rachel Vaknin became Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 7, 2021 | Simon Sharon became General Manager, CTO |
| Aug 1, 2020 | Tal Baruch Wenderow became a director |
| May 1, 2020 | Eyal Morag became Chief Medical Officer |
| Apr 1, 2020 | Aileen Ptucha Stockburger became a director |
| Dec 26, 2019 | Harel Gadot no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Oct 18, 2019 | Joseph Mona reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 23, 2019 | Yoseph Bornstein no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Nov 16, 2018 | Joseph Mona became a 10% owner |
| Dec 6, 2017 | Prattipati Laxminarain became a director |
| Oct 17, 2017 | Yehezkel Himelfarb first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Sep 18, 2017 | Harel Gadot listed as Chairman, President and CEO (previously Chairman and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Jun 20, 2017 | Leon Lewkowicz reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 6, 2017 | Martin J. Madden became a director |
| Dec 5, 2016 | Yehezkel Himelfarb became General Manager & COO |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Yoseph Bornstein became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Yoseph Bornstein became a 10% owner |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Yoav Zvi Waizer became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Scott R Burell became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Sandra Berkson became a 10% owner |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Moshe Shoham became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Mayer Solomon became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Leon Lewkowicz became a 10% owner |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Harel Gadot became a director |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Harel Gadot became a 10% owner |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Harel Gadot became Chairman and CEO |
| Nov 28, 2016 | David Ben Naim became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 28, 2016 | Avram Berkson became a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (8)
- Yoseph Bornstein · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 6, 2023
- Yoav Zvi Waizer · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 24, 2019
- David Ben Naim · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 24, 2018
- Yehezkel Himelfarb · Last reported as General Manager & COO in an SEC filing dated Oct 17, 2017
- Moshe Shoham · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 10, 2017
- Mayer Solomon · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 30, 2016
- Sandra Berkson · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Nov 30, 2016
- Avram Berkson · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Nov 30, 2016
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
4 ETFs hold MBOT
4 shown · $3.71M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $901,697 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $205,665 | $1.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | Invesco | 0.37% | $75,520 | — | 2026-10-24 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.26
TTM Revenue
$105.00K
TTM Net Income
$-14.21M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-15.22M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $105.00K | $-3.67M | $-0.05 | $-5.05M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | $-3.46M | $-0.04 | $-3.76M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | $-3.58M | $-0.07 | $-3.84M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | $-3.50M | $-0.10 | $-2.57M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | — | $-2.60M | $-0.08 | $-2.87M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | $-3.39M | $-0.20 | $-1.69M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | — | $-3.21M | $-0.20 | $-2.76M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | — | $-2.46M | $-0.17 | $-1.96M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | — | $-2.37M | $-0.17 | $-2.42M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | $-3.15M | $-0.26 | $-1.82M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | — | $-2.45M | $-0.21 | $-1.66M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | — | $-2.29M | $-0.25 | $-1.85M |
Q1 2026 • period ending 2026-03-31 • filed 2026-05-13
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.63
P/S
442.89
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
408.07
ROE
-19.2%
ROA
-18.2%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-32.74%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$46.50M
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
6.64M
SI % of Float
10.21%
Days to Cover
12.04
Short Vol Ratio
53.2%
Free Float
65.02M
Float %
96.8%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-05-15