NMTC NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation Common Stock
XNAS 3.48 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $0.77 – $6.12
- YTD
- -32.05%
- Straddle Price
- $3.42
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Open
- $0.92
- Day Range
- $0.77 – $0.92
- Volume
- 43,612
- Prev Close
- $0.92
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.82 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.05% |
| WACC | 9.19% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -197.6% |
| Book / Price | 13.9% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 66.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -57.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.41 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.03 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 3189.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 44.6× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 15.8× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $0.30 | 50% | median 2.7× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1.06 | 50% | median 2.9× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.41 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |

- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 18
- List Date
- 2012-11-09
- CIK
- 0001500198
- Next Earnings
- 2026-12-15 (After-Close)
- Headquarters
- Eden Prairie, MN
- Homepage
- https://www.n1mtc.com
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corp is focused on diagnostic, ablation, and deep brain stimulation technology for brain-related conditions such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease; ablation and stimulation for pain management; and drug delivery with diagnostic and stimulation capabilities. It develops thin film electrode technology for various recording and therapeutic applications, crucial for diagnosing neurological disorders such as epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremors. The company operates in one segment, developing and commercializing products for neuromodulation,…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -2.99% | 0.69% | -22.84% | 39.43% | 3.84% | 3.63% |
| Feb | -- | -4.76% | 14.18% | -12.95% | 3.24% | -19.70% | -4.00% |
| Mar | -- | -43.59% | 3.21% | -1.64% | -20.54% | 16.42% | -9.23% |
| Apr | -- | -28.70% | -1.28% | -5.04% | -28.31% | -2.33% | -13.13% |
| May | 2.08% | 54.98% | -26.22% | -19.84% | -1.12% | -18.39% | -1.42% |
| Jun | -8.49% | -43.77% | 2.56% | -15.94% | 14.40% | -18.28% | -11.59% |
| Jul | -29.94% | 40.54% | -11.30% | -15.50% | 11.73% | -44.31% | -8.13% |
| Aug | -27.25% | 112.50% | -19.76% | 10.76% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 12.84% |
| Sep | 14.83% | -19.14% | 2.34% | 25.79% | 23.33% | -36.02% | 1.85% |
| Oct | -30.37% | -38.30% | -3.24% | -2.99% | -10.93% | -18.39%* | -17.37% |
| Nov | -23.80% | 43.88% | 62.92% | -33.71% | -9.07% | -- | 8.04% |
| Dec | -9.77% | -16.08% | 8.97% | 27.08% | 11.29% | -- | 4.30% |
| Total | -73.83% | -41.74% | 10.91% | -59.33% | 16.15% | -81.61% | -38.24% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key drivers:
- Strong recent revenue growth (105% Q3 increase)
- Regulatory approval for sEEG RF ablation procedure code
- Moderate volatility and correlation with market
Primary risks:
- Nasdaq delisting risk due to share price issues
- Unusual options activity may indicate insider buying or trading
Investment thesis: NMTC's recent revenue growth, regulatory approvals, and moderate volatility make it an attractive long-term investment opportunity.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headlines have contributed to the stock's upward momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Medium-term uptrend (1-3 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.85
- SMA 50: $2.09
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.27
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (40.06)
- MACD: Bearish (-0.11 / -0.01 / -0.10)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 increasing, indicating growing institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive revenue growth and regulatory approvals are the primary drivers of the stock's upward momentum.
Sentiment Assessment: Overall sentiment is positive (66.7% of news headlines are positive).
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release may provide further catalysts or clarification on share price issues.
Market Narrative: News aligns with medium-term uptrend and moderate volatility, supporting the bullish case.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta 0.82 vs SPY), indicating a defensive stock.
Volatility Regime: Moderate volatility regime, with average true range of $0.26.
Options Market Signals: IV rank is medium-high (68.5%), indicating historically high volatility. Options market pricing a $2.35 move by expiration.
Downside Protection: Support levels include SMA 20 and Bollinger Band Lower ($1.43).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: NMTC's sector is outperforming the overall market, with a relative strength index of 62.5%.
Institutional Activity: Volume flow indicates growing institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: Stock has a moderate correlation (0.13) with the broader market, suggesting some independence from market trends.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range is moderate, indicating potential for further price movement.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 ($1.85), SMA 50 ($2.09), and Bollinger Band Upper ($2.27) are key support and resistance levels.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A close above $2.27 could trigger a medium-term breakout, while a close below $1.43 could trigger a breakdown.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings release (no date available).
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and Bollinger Band Lower for downside protection.
Please note that this report is based on the provided data and should not be considered as personalized investment advice.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-14 | After-Close | 2.18% | 13.75% | 6.31x | Exceeded |
| 2023-12-14 | After-Close | 36.17% | 11.05% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2024-08-14 | Pre-Market | 657.89% | 0.12% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2024-12-17 | After-Close | 308.23% | 6.41% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-02-12 | After-Close | 445.45% | 1.79% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-05-13 | After-Close | 489.28% | 2.48% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-08-14 | After-Close | 328.31% | 1.23% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-10-06 | After-Close | 61.10% | 6.47% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-12-17 | Pre-Market | 88.43% | 5.49% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2026-02-17 | After-Close | 355.18% | 0.16% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2026-05-12 | After-Close | 100.80% | 2.73% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2026-08-13 | Pre-Market | 133.22% | 20.39% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2026-10-05 | After-Close | 65.54% | 1.35% | 0.02x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
NMTC Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $215K | #2867 of 3138 | -89.2% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $46K | #6023 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NMTC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
NMTC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-08| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-08 | David J. Wambeke | Chief Business Officer | Buy (P) | +33,333 | $2.01 | $67.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-28 | David A Rosa | CEO & President | Grant (A) | +68,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Christopher Volker | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +35,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Emily J. Johns | Chief Administrative Officer | Grant (A) | +12,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Mark Christianson | Market Development Director | Grant (A) | +12,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-28 | Steve Mertens | Chief Technology Officer | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Mark Christianson | Market Development Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $3.18 | -$31.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-07 | Jeffrey S Mathiesen | Director | Award (A) | +41,929 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Edward Andrle | Director | Award (A) | +41,929 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Jason Richard Mills | Director | Award (A) | +41,929 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Paul Buckman | Director | Award (A) | +41,929 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | David A Rosa | CEO and President | Tax (F) | −2,458 | $0.78 | -$1.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | Mark Christianson | Business Development Director | Mixed | −15,616 | $0.74 | -$11.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | Steve Mertens | Chief Technology Officer | Tax (F) | −906 | $0.78 | -$704 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | Mark Christianson | Business Development Director | Sell (S) | −917 | $0.80 | -$734 | EDGAR |
NMTC Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $0.80| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David J. Wambeke | Chief Business Officer | 199,999 | $160.8K | $737.4K | 2 | 2026-09-08 |
| 2 | David A Rosa | CEO & President | 180,022 | $144.7K | $50.0K | 41 | 2026-08-28 |
| 3 | Ronald W. McClurg | Chief Financial Officer | 74,020 | $59.5K | $200.2K | 10 | 2025-04-21 |
| 4 | Paul Buckman | Director | 29,789 | $23.9K | $0 | 7 | 2026-04-07 |
| 5 | Jeffrey S Mathiesen | Director | 26,057 | $20.9K | $0 | 6 | 2026-04-07 |
| 6 | Steve Mertens | Chief Technology Officer | 25,357 | $20.4K | $0 | 39 | 2026-08-28 |
| 7 | Edward Andrle | Director | 22,322 | $17.9K | $0 | 6 | 2026-04-07 |
| 8 | Mark Christianson | Market Development Director | 20,692 | $16.6K | -$391.9K | 53 | 2026-08-28 |
| 9 | Christopher Volker | Chief Financial Officer | 12,500 | $10.0K | $105.0K | 4 | 2026-08-28 |
| 10 | Jason Richard Mills | Director | 8,281 | $6.7K | $0 | 2 | 2026-04-07 |
NMTC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 8, 2026Directors 5
- David A Rosa · since Jul 20, 2017
- Jeffrey S Mathiesen · since Aug 4, 2017
- Paul Buckman · since Aug 4, 2017
- Edward Andrle · since Feb 18, 2020
- Jason Richard Mills · since Dec 18, 2025
Officers 6
- David A Rosa · CEO and President · listed since Nov 2019
- Christopher Volker · Chief Operating Officer · since Nov 10, 2023
- Steve Mertens · Chief Technology Officer · since Apr 1, 2019
- David J. Wambeke · Chief Business Officer · since Mar 1, 2026
- Emily J. Johns · General Counsel · since Jun 1, 2025
- Mark Christianson · Market Development Director · listed since Jul 2026
10% owners 1
- Brian Pratt · since Jul 10, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (34)
| Jul 10, 2026 | Brian Pratt became a 10% owner |
| Jul 2, 2026 | Mark Christianson listed as Market Development Director (previously Business Development Director) in SEC filings |
| Mar 1, 2026 | David J. Wambeke became Chief Business Officer |
| Dec 18, 2025 | Jason Richard Mills became a director |
| Jun 1, 2025 | Emily J. Johns became General Counsel |
| Nov 10, 2023 | Christopher Volker became Chief Operating Officer |
| Jun 25, 2021 | Mark Christianson listed as Business Development Director (previously VP, Business Dev and Marketing) in SEC filings |
| Apr 26, 2021 | Hijaz Haris became VP of Marketing |
| Jan 15, 2021 | Morgan C. Frank became a 10% owner |
| Jan 15, 2021 | Manchester Management Pr, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jan 15, 2021 | Manchester Management Co LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jan 15, 2021 | Manchester Explorer, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jan 15, 2021 | James E Besser became a 10% owner |
| Jan 1, 2021 | Ronald W. McClurg became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 16, 2020 | Mark Christianson no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Feb 18, 2020 | Edward Andrle became a director |
| Nov 7, 2019 | David A Rosa no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Nov 7, 2019 | David A Rosa listed as CEO and President (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Apr 4, 2019 | Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 1, 2019 | Steve Mertens became Chief Technology Officer |
| Jan 1, 2019 | Scott Heuler became Vice President of Sales |
| Aug 4, 2017 | Suraj Kalia became a director |
| Aug 4, 2017 | Paul Buckman became a director |
| Aug 4, 2017 | Jeffrey S Mathiesen became a director |
| Jul 20, 2017 | Wade Fredrickson became a 10% owner |
| Jul 20, 2017 | Thomas Bachinski became Chief Development Officer |
| Jul 20, 2017 | Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research became a 10% owner |
| Jul 20, 2017 | Mark Christianson became a 10% owner |
| Jul 20, 2017 | Mark Christianson became VP, Business Dev and Marketing |
| Jul 20, 2017 | David A Rosa became a director |
| Jul 20, 2017 | David A Rosa became a 10% owner |
| Jul 20, 2017 | David A Rosa became Chief Executive Officer |
| May 19, 2017 | Lifestyle Healthcare LLC became a 10% owner |
| May 19, 2017 | Chromium 24 LLC became a 10% owner |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (14)
- Ronald W. McClurg · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 21, 2025
- Hijaz Haris · Last reported as VP of Marketing in an SEC filing dated Apr 28, 2021
- James E Besser · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 21, 2021
- Manchester Explorer, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 21, 2021
- Morgan C. Frank · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 21, 2021
- Manchester Management Co LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 21, 2021
- Manchester Management Pr, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 21, 2021
- Suraj Kalia · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 7, 2019
- Wade Fredrickson · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 23, 2019
- Scott Heuler · Last reported as Vice President of Sales in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2019
- Amer Samad · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 7, 2017
- Lifestyle Healthcare LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 26, 2017
- Thomas Bachinski · Last reported as Chief Development Officer in an SEC filing dated Jul 24, 2017
- Chromium 24 LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 13, 2017
NMTC Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-30What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | Christianson Mark | Officer | 10,000 | $33.4K | 2026-06-30 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-09 | Christianson Mark | Officer | 30,000 | $25.2K | 2026-03-09 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-20 | Christianson Mark | Officer | 30,000 | $24.2K | 2025-08-20 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-14 | Christianson Mark | Co-Founder, VP of Business Communication,Affiliate | 30,000 | $30.6K | 2025-03-14 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-24 | Christianson Mark | co-founder, VP of Business Communication, Affiliat | 30,000 | $32.7K | 2024-05-24 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-21 | Christianson Mark | Officer | 50,000 | $69.0K | 2023-12-21 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $1.97M | $-2.01M | $-0.28 | $-1.08M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $2.39M | $-2.09M | $-0.25 | $-1.33M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-12-31 | $2.89M | $-1.44M | $-1.08 | $-3.12M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $5.74M | $-1.62M | $-1.44 | $-1.53M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $1.70M | $-1.50M | $-0.19 | $-1.46M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $1.39M | $-2.27M | $-0.44 | $-56.14K |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-12-31 | $3.27M | $1.79M | $2.16 | $208.05K |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $272.28K | $-3.35M | $-3.96 | $-2.67M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $825.78K | $-2.77M | $-3.60 | $-2.36M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $1.38M | $-2.86M | $-3.96 | $-2.18M |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-12-31 | $977.65K | $-3.34M | $-5.04 | $-3.81M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $741.78K | $-3.14M | $-4.68 | $-2.90M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.