QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2025-02-05
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.79% issuer, Oct 23, 2026
- Assets
- $13M issuer-reported, Oct 22, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.62% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $183K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 5 top 10 are 101.6%
- Listed
- Feb 5, 2025 Cboe BZX
- Net asset value
- $18.24 issuer, Oct 22, 2026
- Reference asset
- MBTX period ends Dec 31, 2026 (69 days)
- Cap, full period
- 25.0% before fees
- Buffer, full period
- — first losses absorbed
Moves with. Bitcoin (91% of its variance, beta 0.59). These factors explain 90% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Fund seeks to provide investors with investment results that participate in a percentage of any positive price returns of bitcoin (prior to taking into account management fees, shareholder transaction fees, brokerage commissions, taxes and any extraordinary expenses incurred by the Fund) while providing a maximum loss of 20% of any bitcoin price return losses (prior to taking into account management fees, shareholder transaction fees, brokerage commissions, taxes and any extraordinary expenses incurred by the Fund), over successive three -month periods. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 5 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Floor & Protection ETFs
- Jul 2026
- −$1.6M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$1.6M −12.8% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$7.2M +59.2% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | −$1.6M |
| Jun 2026 | $0 |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | −$1.8M |
| Mar 2026 | +$874K |
| Feb 2026 | +$902K |
| Jan 2026 | $0 |
| Dec 2025 | +$1.1M |
| Nov 2025 | +$1.1M |
| Oct 2025 | +$4.0M |
| Sep 2025 | +$1.1M |
| Aug 2025 | +$1.4M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 18 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAJLInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6mo Jan/Jul | — | 0.79% | $304M | +5.5% | compare |
| ZSEPInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September | — | 0.79% | $243M | +5.2% | compare |
| ZOCTInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October | — | 0.79% | $215M | +5.8% | compare |
| ZJULInnovtor Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July | — | 0.79% | $195M | +5.3% | compare |
| ZAUGInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August | — | 0.79% | $162M | +5.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Floor & Protection category.
- Authorized participants
- 3 active of 3 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $49M · $29M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 27% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-01-02 | $0.2959 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | United States Treasury Bill 12/31/2026 | 81.58% | Treasury | US |
| — | MBTX 12/31/2026 157.55 C | 20.05% | Derivative | — |
| — | US BANK MMDA - USBGFS 9 09/01/2037 | 0.01% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | Cash & Other | -0.06% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | MBTX 12/31/2026 196.94 C | -1.59% | Derivative | — |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 76.55% | $9.3M | 1 |
| Derivative (equity) | 23.47% | $2.9M | 2 |
| Short-term investment | 0.06% | $7059 | 1 |
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -5.23% | -5.23% |
| Feb | -11.03% | -10.45% | -10.74% |
| Mar | -5.96% | -4.81% | -5.38% |
| Apr | 6.97% | 8.22% | 7.60% |
| May | 6.12% | -4.84% | 0.64% |
| Jun | 2.14% | -16.30% | -7.08% |
| Jul | 8.05% | 3.62% | 5.84% |
| Aug | -3.61% | 16.39% | 6.39% |
| Sep | 2.83% | 5.78% | 4.30% |
| Oct | -5.19% | -3.24%* | -4.21% |
| Nov | -11.15% | -- | -11.15% |
| Dec | -3.87% | -- | -3.87% |
| Total | -15.87% | -14.04% | -14.96% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: QBF
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10 Key drivers and primary risks: * Neutral technical signals, ranging trend * Bullish momentum indicators (MACD) * Volatility amplification with market moves Recent news sentiment impact: Positive headline on WLFI and its strategic vision has a neutral impact due to lack of direct correlation with QBF.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term - range-bound, Medium-term - downtrend, Long-term - uptrend Support/Resistance Levels: Upper Bollinger Band ($19.73), Middle MA 50 ($18.23) Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: Neutral (36.91) * MACD signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line) * Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (squeeze) Volume Analysis: Low volume, institutional interest signals mixed
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news on WLFI and its strategic vision Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment - Neutral Catalyst Identification: None Market Narrative: No clear narrative aligning with or contradicting technical signals
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta 1.05 vs SPY) Volatility Regime: Above average volatility amplification with market moves Options Market Signals: IV premium vs HV30 - N/A (no clear signal) Downside Protection: Lower Bollinger Band ($17.84) and Middle MA 50 ($18.23)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: QBF performs relatively weakly in its sector Institutional Activity: Mixed institutional interest signals Correlation Analysis: High correlation with market (R-squared 0.88) Relative Valuation: Slightly below trading range average
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($17.84) and Middle MA 50 ($18.23) Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Upper Bollinger Band ($19.73) for potential buy signal Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None Risk Management: Set stop-loss levels around $16.00 to manage risk
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of QBF, incorporating technical indicators, recent news headlines, and risk metrics. The overall assessment is NEUTRAL due to mixed signals from various indicators. Technical analysis suggests a range-bound short-term trend, while momentum oscillators indicate bullish momentum. Recent news sentiment is positive but lacks direct correlation with QBF. Risk metrics reveal high volatility amplification with market moves. Key levels for price action and risk management considerations are highlighted.
QBF Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
QBF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|