RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
ETF 23.04 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $8.43 – $52.91
- YTD
- -20.32%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 5.71
- Straddle Price
- $0.00
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 5.00
- Open
- $9.24
- Day Range
- $9.24 – $9.64
- Volume
- 11,592
- Prev Close
- $9.10
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2025-07-28
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $2.2M SEC filing, Jul 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $196K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 7 top 10 are 56.4%
- Listed
- Jul 28, 2025 NYSE Arca
Moves with. Bitcoin (4% of its variance, beta 0.19); Value over growth (4% of its variance, beta -0.66); US large-cap stocks (3% of its variance, beta 0.52). These factors explain 15% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Stated objective. The Funds primary investment objective is to seek current income. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 7 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Single-Stock Option Income ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$965K latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$1.9M +85.6% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$26M +1175.6% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$965K |
| Jun 2026 | +$591K |
| May 2026 | +$338K |
| Apr 2026 | −$16K |
| Mar 2026 | −$9.4M |
| Feb 2026 | −$1.1M |
| Jan 2026 | −$1.9M |
| Dec 2025 | +$740K |
| Nov 2025 | −$230K |
| Oct 2025 | +$4.0M |
| Sep 2025 | +$32M |
| Aug 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 13 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDYYieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | — | — | $1.4B | −26.1% | compare |
| MSTYYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | — | — | $1.1B | −77.6% | compare |
| TSLYYieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | — | — | $698M | −47.1% | compare |
| AMDYYieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | — | — | $450M | −6.5% | compare |
| PLTYYieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | — | — | $397M | −40.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Single-Stock Option Income category.
- Authorized participants
- 3 active of 3 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $39M · $1.2M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 25,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | First American Government Obli | 58.70% | Short-term investment | US |
| — | TREASURY BILL | 47.46% | Debt | US |
| — | TREASURY BILL | 7.45% | Debt | US |
| — | N/A | 1.46% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | N/A | 0.01% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | N/A | -0.01% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | N/A | -21.86% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 58.70% | $1.3M | 1 |
| US Treasury | 54.91% | $1.2M | 2 |
| Derivative (equity) | -20.40% | $-451564 | 4 |
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -21.91% | -21.91% |
| Feb | -- | -1.24% | -1.24% |
| Mar | -- | -19.09% | -19.09% |
| Apr | -- | -11.26% | -11.26% |
| May | -- | -3.97% | -3.97% |
| Jun | -- | 5.18% | 5.18% |
| Jul | 15.00% | -39.88% | -12.44% |
| Aug | -0.07% | 5.50% | 2.71% |
| Sep | 2.90% | -5.13% | -1.11% |
| Oct | -22.14% | 7.14%* | -7.50% |
| Nov | -13.33% | -- | -13.33% |
| Dec | -15.20% | -- | -15.20% |
| Total | -32.33% | -63.94% | -48.14% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers: Strong bearish momentum, oversold RSI, and negative MACD signal.
Primary Risks: High volatility, beta >1.36, and potential breakdown below $9.08.
Investment Thesis: The stock is likely to continue its downtrend in the short-term due to strong bearish momentum. However, a bounce back to $12.33 (SMA 20) could occur if the RSI bounces off the oversold level.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available, which reduces the impact on sentiment analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Bearish in the short-term (1-4 weeks), medium-term (1-3 months).
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $15.57
- Middle Bollinger Band: $12.33
- Lower Bollinger Band: $9.10
- Support level: $9.08 (current price)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30), potential buy signal.
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover, further sell signal.
- Bollinger Bands position: Oversold, indicating potential mean reversion.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (due to lack of recent news).
Catalyst Identification: None.
Market Narrative: The market narrative is driven by technical signals and lacks any significant news catalysts.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk, beta >1.36.
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime, current vs historical volatility levels.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 33.0% (Medium).
- Put/Call ratio: 5.00 (Bearish sentiment).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No specific sector data available.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity signals.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY: 0.30, suggesting a high degree of movement relative to the market.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its normal range, but at a discount compared to historical prices.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support level: $9.08 (current price)
- Resistance level: $12.33 (SMA 20)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts available.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set below $8.00, considering the high volatility and potential breakdown. Position sizing considerations should prioritize risk management in this volatile market.
This comprehensive analysis highlights the bearish momentum in the short-term, with strong technical signals indicating a potential downtrend continuation. However, the oversold RSI and negative MACD signal suggest a potential mean reversion or bounce back to $12.33 (SMA 20). Risk management considerations should prioritize stop-loss levels below $8.00 and position sizing considerations in this volatile market.
RBLY Options Activity & IV Rank
RBLY IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
RBLY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|