RENX RenX Enterprises Corp. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- REFUSE SYSTEMS (4953) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 38
- List Date
- 2023-09-19
- CIK
- 0001959023
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- EPS Forecast
- ($1.42) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.renxent.com
RenX Enterprises Corp is engaged in real property development using purpose-built, prefabricated modules constructed from both wood and steel. The Company's operations mainly focused on the acquisition, entitlement, and development of residential properties in high-growth markets across the United States. These efforts included the direct acquisition of land, strategic investments in real estate entities, and joint venture partnerships targeting green, single-family, and multifamily housing projects. The company operates in four segments: real estate development, technology, compost sales, and…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -18.43% | -18.43% |
| Feb | -- | -13.00% | -13.00% |
| Mar | -- | -32.06% | -32.06% |
| Apr | -- | 9.20% | 9.20% |
| May | -- | -38.75% | -38.75% |
| Jun | -- | 14.63% | 14.63% |
| Jul | -- | -2.07% | -2.07% |
| Aug | -- | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sep | -- | 1.46% | 1.46% |
| Oct | -- | -49.06%* | -49.06% |
| Nov | -- | -- | -- |
| Dec | -24.99% | -- | -24.99% |
| Total | -24.99% | -81.29% | -53.14% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: RenX
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Positive news sentiment surrounding debt elimination, earnings beats, and contract expansions
- Bullish momentum signals from MACD and technical indicators
- High beta indicating high volatility, aligning with recent market movements
Primary Risks:
- High volatility could lead to sudden price drops
- Lack of earnings data availability limits risk assessment
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Neutral (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: Uptrend (1-3 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.87 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.16 (resistance)
- Recent highs: $2.10 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (58.80) with potential for further upward movement
- MACD signal: Bullish (0.05 / Signal: 0.04 / Histogram: 0.01)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive sentiment surrounding debt elimination, earnings beats, and contract expansions.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive (3/5)
Catalyst Identification: Earnings beat in the recent past, potential for future positive surprises.
Market Narrative: Technical signals align with positive news sentiment, indicating a potentially strong uptrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta: 1.69) relative to market volatility.
Volatility Regime: High volatility (stock moves more than market).
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 ($1.87) and recent lows around $1.60.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: RenX is outperforming its sector peers in the short term.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest appears to be increasing, as evidenced by rising volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: RenX has a moderate positive correlation (0.10) with the market, indicating alignment with broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: RenX is relatively undervalued compared to its peers and sector averages.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20 ($1.87): support
- Upper Bollinger Band ($2.16): resistance
- Recent highs ($2.10): resistance
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcement in the near future (date TBA).
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and position sizing to manage risk.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and should not be taken as personalized investment advice.
RENX Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 214
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $25K | #6134 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RENX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
RENX Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Jeffrey C. Tweedy | Director | Grant (A) | +8,318 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Peter G. DeMaria | Director | Grant (A) | +8,294 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Christopher Melton | Director | Grant (A) | +8,254 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg | Director | Grant (A) | +8,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | J. Scott Magrane | Director | Grant (A) | +8,294 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-10 | David Roberto Villarreal | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +72,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-10 | Nicolai Ayrton Brune | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +50,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg | Director | Grant (A) | +626,253 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-29 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg | Director | Grant (A) | +80,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-29 | J. Scott Magrane | Director | Grant (A) | +80,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-29 | Peter G. DeMaria | Director | Grant (A) | +80,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-29 | Jeffrey C. Tweedy | Director | Grant (A) | +80,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-29 | Christopher Melton | Director | Grant (A) | +80,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
RENX Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $1.08| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Roberto Villarreal | Chief Executive Officer | 75,723 | $81.8K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-10 |
| 2 | Nicolai Ayrton Brune | Chief Financial Officer | 51,382 | $55.5K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-10 |
RENX Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 15, 2026Directors 8
- Christopher Melton · since Sep 18, 2023
- David Roberto Villarreal · since Sep 18, 2023
- J. Scott Magrane · since Sep 18, 2023
- Jeffrey C. Tweedy · since Sep 18, 2023
- Peter G. DeMaria · since Sep 18, 2023
- Anthony M. Cialone · since Jun 17, 2025
- Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg · since Jun 17, 2025
- James D Burnham · since Jun 17, 2025
Officers 2
- David Roberto Villarreal · Chief Executive Officer · since Sep 18, 2023
- Nicolai Ayrton Brune · Chief Financial Officer · since Sep 18, 2023
10% owners 2
- Anthony M. Cialone · listed since Oct 2025
- James D Burnham · listed since Oct 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (25)
| Jun 15, 2026 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Oct 2, 2025 | James D Burnham first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Oct 2, 2025 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Oct 2, 2025 | Anthony M. Cialone first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Jun 23, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Yaniv Blumenfeld from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Paul M. Galvin from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Alyssa L. Richardson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2025 | James D Burnham became a director |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Bjarne Erik Siwert Borg became a director |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Anthony M. Cialone became a director |
| Feb 26, 2024 | Nicolai Ayrton Brune no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Feb 6, 2024 | Nicolai Ayrton Brune first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Nov 21, 2023 | Safe & Green Holdings Corp. first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Sep 28, 2023 | Safe & Green Holdings Corp. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Yaniv Blumenfeld became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Safe & Green Holdings Corp. became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Peter G. DeMaria became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Paul M. Galvin became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Nicolai Ayrton Brune became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Jeffrey C. Tweedy became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | J. Scott Magrane became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | David Roberto Villarreal became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | David Roberto Villarreal became Chief Executive Officer |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Christopher Melton became a director |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Alyssa L. Richardson became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (1)
- Safe & Green Holdings Corp. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Apr 3, 2024
RENX Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2024-09-10What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Brune Nicolai Ayrton | Officer | 10,000 | $2.4K | 2024-09-10 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-06 | Brune Nicolai Ayrton | Officer | 12,000 | $3.2K | 2024-09-06 | RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOC. | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $21,886 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.