RGYY GraniteShares YieldBoost RGTI ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GraniteShares YieldBoost RGTI ETF (RGYY) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2025-11-24
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 1.07% prospectus, filed Sep 11, 2025
- Assets
- $2.9M SEC filing, Jun 30, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 220.85% paid weekly
- Average daily volume
- $92K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 10 top 10 are 42.2%
- Listed
- Nov 24, 2025 Nasdaq
Moves with. Small caps over large (15% of its variance, beta 1.07); Value over growth (7% of its variance, beta -0.43); Bitcoin (6% of its variance, beta 0.10); High yield over Treasuries (3% of its variance, beta 1.13). These factors explain 36% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Funds primary investment objective is to achieve 2 times (200%) the income generated from selling options on Rigetti Computing, Inc.s common stock (NYSE: RGTI) (the Underlying Stock) by selling options on leveraged exchange-traded funds designed to deliver 2 times (200%) the daily performance of the Underlying Stock (the Underlying Leveraged ETF). The Funds secondary investment objective is to gain exposure to the performance of the Underlying Leveraged ETF, subject to a cap on potential investment gains. A downside protection may be implemented which could affect the net income level. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 10 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Covered Call ETFs
- Jun 2026
- +$1.1M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$1.4M +47.6% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- —
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +$1.1M |
| May 2026 | +$270K |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | +$250K |
| Feb 2026 | +$266K |
| Jan 2026 | +$1.7M |
| Dec 2025 | +$873K |
| Nov 2025 | +$750K |
| Oct 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 9 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEPIJPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | — | 0.35% | $45.8B | −0.3% | compare |
| JEPQJ.P. Morgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | — | 0.35% | $44.4B | +5.9% | compare |
| QQQINEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF | — | 0.68% | $15.1B | +2.4% | compare |
| SPYINEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | — | 0.68% | $12.5B | +2.7% | compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | — | 0.60% | $8.5B | +8.9% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Covered Call category.
- Authorized participants
- 2 active of 2 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $5.6M · $378K over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-14 | $0.0890 | CD |
| 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-06 | $0.0930 | CD |
| 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-29 | $0.0948 | CD |
| 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-22 | $0.0958 | CD |
| 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-15 | $0.0937 | CD |
| 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-09 | $0.0956 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Treasury Bill | 29.91% | Debt | US |
| — | The Options Clearing Corporation | 1.92% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | The Options Clearing Corporation | 1.76% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | The Options Clearing Corporation | -4.43% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | The Options Clearing Corporation | -4.66% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 40.94% | $1.2M | 2 |
| Derivative (equity) | -1.13% | $-33078 | 8 |
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -20.57% | -20.57% |
| Feb | -- | -17.18% | -17.18% |
| Mar | -- | -19.11% | -19.11% |
| Apr | -- | -4.00% | -4.00% |
| May | -- | -7.25% | -7.25% |
| Jun | -- | -8.79% | -8.79% |
| Jul | -- | -14.86% | -14.86% |
| Aug | -- | -10.24% | -10.24% |
| Sep | -- | -3.02% | -3.02% |
| Oct | -- | -8.10%* | -8.10% |
| Nov | -3.77% | -- | -3.77% |
| Dec | -15.36% | -- | -15.36% |
| Total | -18.55% | -70.57% | -44.56% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
RGYY Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 218
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
RGYY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|