Rockwell Automation, Inc.(ROK)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $305.44 – $486.47
- YTD
- +19.59%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 34.0
- Straddle Price
- $30.50
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 7.48
- Market Cap
- $53.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.50% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.00% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.78% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +27.5pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +4.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.04 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $1.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 30.9% |
| Book / Price | 6.6% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 52.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 15.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.72 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +19.9% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $441.07 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $460.12 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.1B |
| Market Cap | $54B |
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -2.2% | +0.53 | -0.77 | 35.8% | — |
| 42d | -4.4% | +0.32 | -0.77 | 35.8% | — |
| 63d | -6.7% | -0.22 | -0.77 | 35.8% | — |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $169.46 | 16% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $128.08 | 13% | |
| Peer P/E | $314.77 | 7% | median 31.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $517.25 | 7% | median 29.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $266.22 | 1% | median 8.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $981.71 | 5% | median 12.1× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $441.07 | 33% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $465.74 | 16% | 31 strikes · skew +1.50 |
- Industry (SIC)
- MEASURING & CONTROLLING DEVICES, NEC (3829)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $53.3B
With roots tracing back to the early 1900s, Rockwell Automation is the successor to Rockwell International, which spun off its avionics segment in 2001. It is a pure-play industrial automation company that operates through three segments. Its largest segment by revenue, intelligent devices, sells factory floor-level devices such as motors, drives, sensors, relays, and actuators. Its software and control segment sells visualization, simulation, and human-machine interface software and control products such as programmable controllers, computers, and operator terminals. Its smallest segment, lif…
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.63% | 23 |
| Feb | +1.91% | 23 |
| Mar | +0.46% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.22% | 23 |
| May | +1.65% | 23 |
| Jun | +0.66% | 23 |
| Jul | +3.53% | 22 |
| Aug | -0.58% | 22 |
| Sep | -0.43% | 23 |
| Oct | +3.18% | 23 |
| Nov | +6.16% | 23 |
| Dec | +1.32% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-07 | Pre-Market | 8.71% | 0.11% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | Pre-Market | 7.86% | 5.77% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2025-02-10 | Pre-Market | 7.42% | 12.71% | 1.71x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-07 | Pre-Market | 8.03% | 11.90% | 1.48x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-06 | Pre-Market | 8.03% | 4.91% | 0.61x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | Pre-Market | 8.27% | 2.73% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-02-05 | Pre-Market | 8.48% | 6.66% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2026-05-05 | Pre-Market | 7.93% | 8.59% | 1.08x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 34.0
- IV Rank (7D)
- 34.0
- Avg IV
- 58.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $30.50
- Straddle (7D)
- $30.50
- P/C Volume
- 7.48
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.53
- Correlation (SPY)
- 63.9%
- R²
- 0.41
- Ann. Volatility
- 29.8%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $103.97M | 26.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $68.12M | 17.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | BlackRock, Inc. Custodian | $50.78M | 12.97% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Oribel Capital Management, LP | $39.55M | 10.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $35.46M | 9.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $21.07M | 5.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $11.30M | 2.89% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | PEAK6 LLC | $8.36M | 2.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC | $7.36M | 1.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $7.21M | 1.84% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $7.18M | 1.83% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $7.18M | 1.83% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $6.60M | 1.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Walleye Trading LLC | $5.02M | 1.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $3.05M | 0.78% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.62M | 0.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $1.83M | 0.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $1.48M | 0.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.22M | 0.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $933.09K | 0.24% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC | $897.20K | 0.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $251.22K | 0.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Capula Management Ltd | $71.78K | 0.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $109.17M | 29.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $58.93M | 15.97% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $53.94M | 14.62% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $38.04M | 10.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $33.02M | 8.95% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $17.92M | 4.85% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $17.26M | 4.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $10.77M | 2.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $8.86M | 2.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $4.52M | 1.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $3.41M | 0.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC | $2.69M | 0.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.58M | 0.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $2.01M | 0.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.79M | 0.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.29M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.11M | 0.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $615.06K | 0.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $538.32K | 0.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Focused Wealth Management, Inc | $251.22K | 0.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Capula Management Ltd | $215.33K | 0.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | PEAK6 LLC | $107.66K | 0.03% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | Matthew W. Fordenwalt | SVP Lifecycle Services | Sell (S) | −377 | $460.51 | -$173.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Matthew W. Fordenwalt | SVP Lifecycle Services | Mixed | +377 | $456.34 | -$99.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | JOHN M MILLER | VP and Chief IP Counsel | Mixed | −354 | $310.44 | -$353.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | Terry L. Riesterer | Vice President and Controller | Mixed | −200 | $354.09 | -$858.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | SCOTT GENEREUX | Sr.VP, Chief Revenue Officer | Sell (S) | −550 | $447.73 | -$246.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | Christopher Nardecchia | SVP, Chief Information Officer | Mixed | — | $398.60 | -$242.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | Matthew W. Fordenwalt | SVP Lifecycle Services | Mixed | — | $348.18 | -$121.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-17 | DAVID A ZAPICO | Director | Award (A) | +229 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-14 | Matthew W. Fordenwalt | SVP Lifecycle Services | Mixed | — | $298.21 | -$244.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-13 | Cyril Perducat | SVP, Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +383 | $395.00 | -$78.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-09 | Matheus De A G Viera Bulho | SVP Software and Control | Sell (S) | −1,250 | $387.50 | -$484.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | Matheus De A G Viera Bulho | SVP Software and Control | Mixed | +583 | $359.00 | -$107.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | William P Gipson | Director | Grant (A) | +90 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-03 | Robert L. Buttermore | SVP,Chief Supply Chain Officer | Mixed | −400 | $334.68 | -$1.28M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-27 | Christopher Nardecchia | SVP, Chief Information Officer | Mixed | — | $310.84 | -$2.87M | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KEITH D NOSBUSCH | Director | 430,330 | $205.19M | -$212.00M | 90 | 2018-12-06 |
| 2 | Blake D. Moret | President and CEO | 172,700 | $82.35M | -$85.35M | 75 | 2025-12-10 |
| 3 | THEODORE D CRANDALL | Senior Vice President | 84,346 | $40.22M | -$62.49M | 65 | 2018-12-06 |
| 4 | ROBERT A RUFF | Sr. Vice President | 57,347 | $27.34M | -$21.58M | 30 | 2013-12-10 |
| 5 | JOSEPH D SWANN | Sr. Vice President | 42,786 | $20.40M | $0 | 1 | 2007-05-14 |
| 6 | BRUCE M ROCKWELL | Director | 41,310 | $19.70M | -$348.8K | 13 | 2011-02-02 |
| 7 | JOHN P MCDERMOTT | Sr. Vice President | 37,731 | $17.99M | -$42.96M | 68 | 2018-12-06 |
| 8 | Patrick P. Goris | Sr. VP and CFO | 34,159 | $16.29M | -$9.63M | 19 | 2020-11-13 |
| 9 | Sujeet Chand | Sr VP, Technology | 32,878 | $15.68M | -$43.74M | 73 | 2021-12-14 |
| 10 | KENNETH F YONTZ | Director | 28,437 | $13.56M | $628.5K | 2 | 2007-10-03 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | Fordenwalt Matthew W. | Officer | 377 | $173.6K | 2026-06-04 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Fordenwalt Matthew W. | Officer | 218 | $99.5K | 2026-06-02 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | MILLER JOHN M | Officer | 1,054 | $449.0K | 2026-05-20 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | Riesterer Terry L. | Officer | 4,024 | $1.82M | 2026-05-07 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | GENEREUX SCOTT | Officer | 550 | $246.3K | 2026-05-05 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Fordenwalt Matthew W. | Officer | 600 | $269.7K | 2026-05-05 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Nardecchia Christopher | Officer | 2,538 | $1.13M | 2026-05-05 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-13 | Fordenwalt Matthew W. | Officer | 1,200 | $480.0K | 2026-04-13 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Perducat Cyril | Officer | 198 | $78.2K | 2026-04-10 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-08 | Bulho Matheus De A G Viera | Officer | 1,250 | $484.4K | 2026-04-08 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 0001024478-26-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-17 | 0001024478-26-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | 0001193125-26-054744 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | 0001024478-26-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0001024478-26-000003 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-21 | 0001193125-25-291330 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-06 | 0001024478-25-000112 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-03 | 0001193125-25-230104 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | 0001024478-25-000081 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-04 | 0001193125-25-134874 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 0001024478-26-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0001024478-26-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | 0001024478-25-000083 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-07 | 0001024478-25-000035 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-10 | 0001024478-25-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-07 | 0001024478-24-000088 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-07 | 0001024478-24-000052 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-31 | 0001024478-24-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-01 | 0001024478-23-000090 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-27 | 0001024478-23-000044 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 49.5 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.2 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.4 |
| TTM Revenue | $8.8B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.1B |
| TTM EPS | $9.63 |
| ROE | 30.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.13% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.05 |