BenzingaT3·12mo ago
SAND Sandstorm Gold Ltd
XNYS
12.12
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SAND
$12.12
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$12.12
- 52-Week Range
- $12.31 – $12.31
- YTD
- -1.54%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.24
- Straddle Price
- $1.45
- P/C Vol Ratio (Nov 21 expiry)
- 0.06
- Market Cap
- $3.6B
- Open
- $12.31
- Day Range
- $12.31 – $12.31
- Prev Close
- $12.31
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.00% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.50% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.52% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +101.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -2.1% |
| Book / Price | 95.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $11.98 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $12.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 56.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.4B |
| Market Cap | $2B |
Peers used for multiples: DDD, VELO, XMTR
(filtered from 5 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
Blended Fair Value
$174.98
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $174.98 | 100% | median 14.9× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 6.8× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.98 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-01 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- GOLD AND SILVER ORES (1040) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $3.6B
- Employees
- 29
- List Date
- 2009-05-29
- CIK
- 0001434614
- Homepage
- https://www.sandstormgold.com
Sandstorm Gold Ltd provides financing to companies engaged in gold mining through the gold stream and royalty. Geographically, the company has operational footprints in North America, South & Central America, Africa, and Asia & Australia. The firm's royalties include Hod Maden, Santa Elena, Chapada, Platreef, Greenstone, and Cerro Moro.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 6373 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $12.38
SMA 50: $11.98
SMA 200: $9.10
Current: $12.31
EMA 12: $12.33
EMA 26: $12.24
MACD: 0.0891 | Signal: -0.0521
BULLISH
ADX (14): 15.61
RANGE
+DI: 23.64
−DI: 21.94
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 52.53
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 26.10
Stoch %D: 28.78
Williams %R: -75.13
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $12.82
BB Lower: $11.95
NEUTRAL
OBV: 206,811,793
Vol SMA 20: 3,521,132
Vol ROC: -100.00%
ATR: $0.21
True Range: $0.00
HV 20: 39.4%
HV 30: 33.9%
HV 60: 29.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2023-11-03T00:00:00 – 2026-03-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: SAND
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key drivers:
- Bullish MACD crossover
- Neutral RSI reading
- Low volatility regime
Primary risks:
- Potential for mean reversion if price continues to rise
- Regulatory issues or changes in the gold mining industry
Investment thesis: SAND is a relatively stable stock with a low beta, which makes it an attractive option for investors seeking a defensive play. The recent news headlines suggest a positive sentiment towards the company's operations and prospects.
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral overall, but the last two headlines (4 & 5) have had a mildly positive impact on the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Uptrend (based on EMA and MACD), Medium-term: Uptrend (based on SMA), Long-term: Sideways trend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($12.82)
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($11.95)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (52.53) - no strong buy or sell signal MACD signal: Bullish crossover (0.09 / Signal: -0.05 / Histogram: 0.14) Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume is relatively low, indicating institutional interest may be waning.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines have been released recently, with a focus on the company's operations and prospects.
Sentiment Assessment: Overall sentiment is Neutral, but with a slightly positive bias due to the recent news.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or catalysts that would significantly impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: The technical signals are in line with the market narrative, which suggests a relatively stable and range-bound market environment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low beta (0.10) indicates low risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime - stock moves less than the market.
Options Market Signals: IV rank: 7.7% (Low) Put/Call volume ratio: 0.00 (Bullish sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels are in place at $11.95 (Lower Bollinger Band).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Gold mining sector is performing relatively well, with a positive correlation to SAND's price movements.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest has been low recently, with no significant buying or selling activity.
Correlation Analysis: SAND is negatively correlated to the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: SAND is trading within its historical range, indicating that it may be relatively undervalued.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($12.82)
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($11.95)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown levels are present at the moment.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified.
Risk Management: Consider placing a stop-loss order around $12.00 to manage potential downside risk.
Overall, SAND appears to be in a stable and range-bound market environment, with a low beta and relatively low volatility. The technical signals suggest an uptrend, but the recent news sentiment is neutral overall. Investors may consider taking a long position at current levels or waiting for further confirmation before entering the market.
Generated
News
All SAND news →
BenzingaT3·13mo ago
BenzingaT3·13mo ago
BenzingaT3·13mo ago
BenzingaT3·14mo ago
BenzingaT3·16mo ago
BenzingaT3·16mo ago
BenzingaT3·19mo ago
BenzingaT3·23mo ago
BenzingaT3·25mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
SAND Options Activity & IV Rank
SAND IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 47.5%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $1.45
7-DTE Move: $0.23
Days to Exp: 35 (2025-11-21)
Options Flow · Nov 21 expiry
Call Volume: 1,672
Put Volume: 99
P/C Volume: 0.059
BULLISH
Call OI: 2,579
Put OI: 971
P/C OI: 0.377
Total OI: 3,550
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.88
ATM Put: $0.57
Call %: 7.2%
Put %: 4.7%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 4,329
Chain OI: 54,989
Last Updated: 10/17/2025
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 60th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
60%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.69
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.96
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.96
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.96: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.96: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 6 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 17 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
+33.2
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 17 · ATM 48.3% / Wing 81.5%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)42.2MediumOct 17
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.45Oct 17
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 6373 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.
SAND Institutional Ownership (13F)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SAND Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2024-10-28
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-28 | Orion Mine Finance Fund III LP | Stockholder (1) | 676,191 | $5.79M | 2024-10-28 | Scotia Capital Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-28 | Orion Mine Finance Fund II LP | Stockholder (1) | 3,223,809 | $27.60M | 2024-10-28 | Scotia Capital Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-18 | Orion Mine Finance Fund III LP | Stockholder (1) | 1,733,823 | $14.06M | 2024-10-18 | Scotia Capital Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-18 | Orion Mine Finance Fund II LP | 10% Stockholder (1) | 8,266,177 | $67.04M | 2024-10-18 | Scotia Capital Inc. | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
44 ETFs hold SAND
25 shown · $2.04B total exposure · 0.17% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $565.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $373.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $285.7M | $187.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.18% | $134.3M | $75.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | Vanguard | 0.25% | $92.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $91.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.14% | $58.3M | $41.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 4.91% | $57.2M | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.37% | $54.0M | $14.8B | 2026-11-06 |
| 10 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.09% | $52.6M | $56.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $45.1M | $33.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 12 | ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.37% | $42.5M | $11.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 13 | IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.31% | $41.6M | $13.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $33.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | IEUR iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.24% | $23.4M | $9.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 16 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $18.7M | $17.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | Invesco | 0.33% | $13.0M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.30% | $11.9M | $4.0B | 2026-11-06 |
| 19 | ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $11.8M | $31.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $7.9M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 21 | IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF | Invesco | 0.52% | $6.3M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 22 | EXI iShares Global Industrials ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.42% | $5.6M | $1.3B | 2026-11-06 |
| 23 | IEV iShares Europe ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.28% | $4.4M | $1.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 24 | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $4.2M | $9.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 25 | CWI State Street® SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.15% | $4.2M | $2.8B | 2026-11-05 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '16 | 2016-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q1 '16 | 2016-03-31 | $13.38M | $13.16M | $0.10 | $9.69M |
| Q4 '15 | 2015-12-31 | $9.86M | $-24.96M | $-0.21 | $4.99M |
| Q3 '15 | 2015-09-30 | $12.09M | $-5.47M | $-0.05 | $8.23M |
| Q2 '15 | 2015-06-30 | $15.43M | $-13.45M | $-0.11 | $9.48M |
| Q1 '15 | 2015-03-31 | $15.29M | $825.00K | $0.01 | $8.12M |
Q4 2024 • period ending 2024-12-31 • filed 2025-03-31
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
3.43
P/S
29.87
EV/EBITDA
77.12
EV/Sales
31.28
ROE
-7.0%
ROA
-5.8%
Div Yield
—
FCF Yield
2.14%
Debt/Equity
0.17
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$1.52B
as of 2026-03-16
SAND vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP BHP Group Limited American Depositary Sh | $203.0B | — | — | +34.2% | 40 |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | $124.0B | — | — | +5.9% | 12 |
| EQT EQT CORP | $30.9B | 11.8 | +18.1% | −6.6% | 52 |
| SAND Sandstorm Gold Ltd | $3.6B | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| EVO Evotec SE American Depositary Shares | $601M | — | — | −45.3% | — |
| ALFA ALFA | — | — | — | −21.1% | — |
| BOL BOL | — | — | — | — | — |
| TELIA TELIA | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOBI SOBI | — | — | — | — | — |
| Peer median | $77.4B | 11.8 | +18.1% | −6.6% | 40 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
3.76M
SI % of Float
1.38%
Days to Cover
1.00
Short Vol Ratio
47.1%
Free Float
272.33M
Float %
92.9%
Short interest 2025-10-15 • Short volume 2025-10-17 • Float 2025-07-02