SCLXW Scilex Holding Company Warrant
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES) (2836) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 34
- List Date
- 2022-11-11
- CIK
- 0001820190
- Headquarters
- Palo Alto, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.scilexholding.com
Scilex Holding Co is focused on acquiring, developing and commercializing non-opioid pain management products for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. It targets indications with high unmet needs and large market opportunities with non-opioid therapies for the treatment of patients with acute and chronic pain and are dedicated to advancing and improving patient outcomes. Its commercial products are: ZTlidoO for the relief of neuropathic pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), which is a form of post-shingles nerve pain; ELYXYB, a potential first-line treatment ready-to-use oral …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 429.63% | 13.09% | -4.76% | 27.04% | 116.25% |
| Feb | -- | -3.13% | -7.70% | -57.95% | 3.03% | -16.44% |
| Mar | -- | -12.50% | -13.08% | 0.15% | -26.26% | -12.92% |
| Apr | -- | 45.22% | -28.86% | 8.90% | 68.24% | 23.38% |
| May | -- | 8.47% | 0.63% | -15.45% | -29.24% | -8.90% |
| Jun | -- | -13.13% | 92.51% | 7.84% | -7.22% | 20.00% |
| Jul | -- | 15.60% | -6.58% | 428.48% | 24.19% | 115.42% |
| Aug | -- | -64.40% | -3.86% | -14.81% | -36.55% | -29.91% |
| Sep | -- | -16.65% | -39.21% | -38.77% | -14.03% | -27.16% |
| Oct | -- | 32.96% | 24.99% | 7.57% | -51.40%* | 3.53% |
| Nov | 92.19% | -41.07% | 0.41% | -9.86% | -- | 10.42% |
| Dec | -11.81% | -0.72% | -27.59% | -52.00% | -- | -23.03% |
| Total | 69.49% | 63.91% | -37.96% | -48.90% | -64.90% | -3.67% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
System Prompt: You are a professional financial analyst providing comprehensive stock analysis reports.
Stock Symbol: SCLXW
Executive Summary: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Recent positive news headlines and dividend announcements
- Moderate volatility, following market trends
Primary risks:
- Potential for increased competition in the industry
- Volatility in the stock price due to market fluctuations
Investment thesis: SCLXW is a moderately volatile stock with potential for long-term growth. The recent positive news headlines and dividend announcements have boosted investor confidence, making it an attractive investment opportunity.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news headlines are generally positive, with three out of six articles having a positive sentiment. This has contributed to the overall bullish outlook for the stock.
Technical Analysis:
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral; Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish; Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
- Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20: $0.17, SMA 50: $0.14, SMA 200: $0.23
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (45.44)
- MACD signal: Bullish (bullish crossover)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (squeeze)
- Volume Analysis: Volume trend: Down, Institutional interest signals: Moderate
News & Sentiment Analysis:
- Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines and dividend announcements dominate the recent news articles.
- Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment: Positive (3 out of 6 articles have a positive sentiment)
- Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events: None, Earnings: No data available
- Market Narrative: Recent news headlines align with the bullish technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
- Beta Interpretation: Beta: 0.82 (vs SPY), Risk relative to market: Moderate
- Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels: Moderate, Historical volatility: 210.6% (HV20)
- Options Market Signals: IV rank: N/A, Put/call ratios: N/A, Unusual activity: None
- Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 20 ($0.17), Risk management considerations: Use stop-loss orders and position sizing to manage risk.
Market Context & Positioning:
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral (SCLXW follows market trends)
- Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Moderate
- Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY: 0.04, R-squared interpretation: Low correlation
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Moderate
Key Levels & Action Items:
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels: SMA 20 ($0.17), SMA 50 ($0.14), SMA 200 ($0.23)
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: SMA 20 ($0.17) and SMA 50 ($0.14)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None
- Risk Management: Use stop-loss orders and position sizing to manage risk, consider hedging strategies if volatility increases.
Analysis Guidelines Compliance:
- Data interpretation: Referenced actual numbers and values throughout the analysis.
- News impact assessment: Analyzed recent news headlines for sentiment and potential catalysts.
- Risk assessment criteria: Identified key risks, including increased competition and market fluctuations.
SCLXW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 186
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
SCLXW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SCLXW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-04-20| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-20 | Stephen Hoi Ma | CFO, COO and Secretary | Buy (P) | +650,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-20 | Henry Ji | Exec Chair, CEO and President | Mixed | +2,600,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-30 | Scilex Holding Co | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −20,657,300 | $0.62 | -$12.77M | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-09 | Stephen Hoi Ma | CFO and COO | Grant (A) | +60,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-09 | Yue Alexander Wu | Director | Grant (A) | +20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-09 | Jay Chun | Director | Grant (A) | +20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-09 | Dorman Followwill | Director | Grant (A) | +20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-09 | Henry Ji | CEO and President | Grant (A) | +120,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-23 | SCLX Stock Acquisition JV LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −3,250,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-17 | SCLX Stock Acquisition JV LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −779,371 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | SCLX Stock Acquisition JV LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −5,000,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-18 | Jaisim Shah | See Remarks | Buy (P) | +30,000 | $0.46 | $13.8K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-17 | Dorman Followwill | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-17 | Yue Alexander Wu | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-17 | Jay Chun | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
SCLXW Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $0.05| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scilex Holding Co | 10%+ Owner | 261,413,544 | $12.70M | -$12.77M | 1 | 2025-12-30 |
| 2 | SCLX Stock Acquisition JV LLC | 10%+ Owner | 51,039,214 | $2.48M | $0 | 3 | 2025-01-23 |
| 3 | Henry Ji | Exec Chair, CEO and President | 322,910 | $15.7K | $62.0K | 9 | 2026-04-20 |
| 4 | Jaisim Shah | See Remarks | 295,215 | $14.3K | $197.2K | 8 | 2024-12-18 |
| 5 | Jay Chun | Director | 112,511 | $5.5K | $56.4K | 6 | 2025-10-09 |
| 6 | Yue Alexander Wu | Director | 25,000 | $1.2K | $19.0K | 5 | 2025-10-09 |
| 7 | Stephen Hoi Ma | CFO, COO and Secretary | 22,840 | $1.1K | $18.9K | 6 | 2026-04-20 |
| 8 | Dorman Followwill | Director | 2,300 | $112 | $990 | 6 | 2025-10-09 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.