SIND Sinda Ltd.
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- GOLD AND SILVER ORES (1040) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.9B
- List Date
- 2026-06-26
- CIK
- 0002096861
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.10) (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- San Miguel Allende
Sinda Ltd is an exploration stage company focused on acquiring, exploring, and developing mineral concessions in Mexico. The company holds mining concessions and exploration and exploitation rights for a silver-gold project located in the Guanajuato silver belt of Mexico. Its principal asset is the Sinda Property, a silver project at the exploration stage.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -- | -- |
| Jun | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Jul | 7.42% | 7.42% |
| Aug | 18.44% | 18.44% |
| Sep | -10.04% | -10.04% |
| Oct | -19.68%* | -19.68% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -8.07% | -8.07% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: SIND
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key drivers: Trend direction, momentum signals, and volatility regime
Primary risks: Volatility contraction, potential reversal from oversold conditions
Investment thesis: SIND is trading in a range-bound environment, with mixed technical and news sentiment. The stock's beta suggests it follows market movements, but its moderate volatility and recent neutral RSI signal indicate a possible consolidation phase.
Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news available; focus on technical signals and risk management considerations.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Neutral (range-bound), no clear direction
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $17.67 (resistance)
- Lower Bollinger Band: $15.00 (support)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: 45.91 (neutral, not overbought or oversold) MACD signal: Bullish momentum, with a positive histogram Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, indicating no strong trends
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 189327.85 (moderate volume)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1578835.11 (accumulation phase)
- Volume Rate of Change: -64.64% (decreasing volume, indicating caution)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, no significant sentiment shifts
Catalyst Identification: None; focus on technical signals and risk management considerations
Market Narrative: The absence of significant news and the stock's range-bound movement suggest a cautious approach.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Moderate risk (0.84) relative to SPY, indicating it follows market movements
Volatility Regime: Moderate volatility (0.72), with some contraction in recent trading
Options Market Signals: No options data available; focus on technical signals and risk management considerations
Downside Protection: Support levels at $15.00 (lower Bollinger Band) and potential reversal from oversold conditions
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Neutral, with no strong sector performance or correlation with SIND
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest, as indicated by OBV accumulation phase
Correlation Analysis: Low correlation (0.13) with SPY; potential for independent movement
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with no clear value proposition
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $15.00 (lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance: $17.67 (upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout: Above $17.67, indicating potential uptrend
- Breakdown: Below $15.00, indicating potential downtrend
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None; focus on technical signals and risk management considerations
Risk Management: Monitor volume trends, RSI levels, and Bollinger Bands for potential reversals or trend changes.
Please note that this report is based solely on the provided data and does not constitute buy/sell advice.
SIND Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 84
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $6.4M | #1901 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $125K | #5690 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SIND Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SIND Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-01| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | Douglas Groh | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Ali Erfan | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Graeme Cameron Maxwell Lamb | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Kalidas V Madhavpeddi | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Scott Cole | Vice President, Finance | Award (A) | +70,834 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Marquez Vanessa Rubio | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Alvarez Jaime Cortes | General Counsel and Secretary | Award (A) | +208,334 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Igor Gonzales | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Fabian Galindo | Country Manager | Award (A) | +62,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Anna El-Erian | Director | Award (A) | +10,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Espantoso Luis M Barreto | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +208,334 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Quintanilla Daniel Muniz | Director | Award (A) | +940,649 | — | EDGAR |
SIND Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $11.39| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quintanilla Daniel Muniz | Director | 1,270,649 | $14.47M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 2 | Fabian Galindo | Country Manager | 454,500 | $5.18M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 3 | Alvarez Jaime Cortes | General Counsel and Secretary | 268,534 | $3.06M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 4 | Espantoso Luis M Barreto | Chief Financial Officer | 238,334 | $2.71M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 5 | Scott Cole | Vice President, Finance | 80,834 | $920.7K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 6 | Ali Erfan | Director | 30,827 | $351.1K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 7 | Douglas Groh | Director | 30,827 | $351.1K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 8 | Kalidas V Madhavpeddi | Director | 10,417 | $118.6K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 9 | Igor Gonzales | Director | 10,417 | $118.6K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
| 10 | Anna El-Erian | Director | 10,417 | $118.6K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-01 |
SIND Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 21, 2026Directors 15
- Ali Erfan · since Jun 25, 2026
- Anna El-Erian · since Jun 25, 2026
- Douglas Groh · since Jun 25, 2026
- ESOF II GP Ltd. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Global Holdings L.p. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Group LLC (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Graeme Cameron Maxwell Lamb · since Jun 25, 2026
- Igor Gonzales · since Jun 25, 2026
- Kalidas V Madhavpeddi · since Jun 25, 2026
- Marquez Vanessa Rubio · since Jun 25, 2026
- Quintanilla Daniel Muniz · since Jun 25, 2026
- TEG Global GP Ltd. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Alberto C Zinser · since Oct 12, 2026
Officers 5
- Scott Cole · Vice President, Finance · since Jun 25, 2026
- Espantoso Luis M Barreto · Chief Financial Officer · since Jun 25, 2026
- Alvarez Jaime Cortes · General Counsel and Secretary · since Jun 25, 2026
- Fabian Galindo · Country Manager · since Jun 25, 2026
- Quintanilla Daniel Muniz · Executive Chairman · since Jun 25, 2026
10% owners 6
- ESOF II GP Ltd. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Global Holdings L.p. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Group LLC (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
- TEG Global GP Ltd. (entity) · since Jun 25, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (26)
| Oct 12, 2026 | Alberto C Zinser became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TEG Global GP Ltd. became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TEG Global GP Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Scott Cole became Vice President, Finance |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Quintanilla Daniel Muniz became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Quintanilla Daniel Muniz became Executive Chairman |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Marquez Vanessa Rubio became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Kalidas V Madhavpeddi became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Igor Gonzales became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Graeme Cameron Maxwell Lamb became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Fabian Galindo became Country Manager |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Espantoso Luis M Barreto became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Group LLC became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Group LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Global Holdings L.p. became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Electrum Global Holdings L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ESOF II GP Ltd. became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ESOF II GP Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Douglas Groh became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Anna El-Erian became a director |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Alvarez Jaime Cortes became General Counsel and Secretary |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Ali Erfan became a director |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.