SINT SiNtx Technologies, Inc. Common Stock

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

SINT — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.0B
Employees
32
List Date
2014-02-13
CIK
0001269026
Next Earnings
2026-11-05 (After-Close)
EPS Forecast
($0.31) (2 est.)
Headquarters
Salt Lake City, UT
Homepage
https://www.sintx.com

SINTX Technologies Inc is an biomaterials company that develops, manufactures, and commercializes patented and proprietary silicon nitride ceramic biomaterials, composites, devices, and related ceramics technologies for other medical and specialized industrial applications. SINTX has 20 years' experience innovating silicon nitride technologies and operates under a quality management system certified to ISO 13485:2016 and AS9100D, with a product portfolio that includes insulators for Tier 1 aerospace suppliers, the FDA-cleared SiNAPTIC Foot & Ankle Osteotomy Wedge System for reconstructive surg…

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan12.50%-23.65%-6.77%-60.21%-16.71%-15.08%-18.32%
Feb10.81%-5.94%-66.27%-8.20%7.47%-8.64%-11.79%
Mar-8.78%26.32%-22.64%-64.47%-8.28%-11.25%-14.85%
Apr-20.53%-13.91%-15.79%17.01%12.84%-16.93%-6.22%
May-3.33%-15.31%-3.29%-22.38%0.74%-7.05%-8.44%
Jun25.49%-4.59%-17.45%-26.27%16.67%-12.62%-3.13%
Jul-3.41%13.64%18.60%11.87%-21.63%-8.60%1.75%
Aug-15.38%-6.10%-36.49%-27.74%72.92%-13.56%-4.39%
Sep-9.86%-19.96%-15.62%-4.40%-10.50%49.66%-1.78%
Oct-4.72%-67.30%-42.78%0.00%-21.62%-26.76%*-27.20%
Nov-27.12%35.25%-22.25%28.53%24.25%--7.73%
Dec-17.77%-19.20%1.01%-13.37%18.04%---6.26%
Total-53.88%-80.74%-95.33%-92.52%51.82%-59.77%-55.07%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $1.94
SMA 50: $1.78
SMA 200: $2.27
Current: $1.56
EMA 12: $1.76
EMA 26: $1.82
MACD: -0.0679 | Signal: -0.0615
BEARISH
ADX (14): 24.69
WEAK TREND
+DI: 16.62
−DI: 25.02

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 31.53
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 0.50
Stoch %D: 3.74
Williams %R: -98.50

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $2.40
BB Lower: $1.48
NEUTRAL
OBV: 160,799,692
Vol SMA 20: 83,178
Vol ROC: -65.63%
ATR: $0.13
True Range: $0.11
HV 20: 68.3%
HV 30: 65.5%
HV 60: 67.5%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for SINT:

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers: The recent price movement of SINT is primarily driven by its momentum signals, which suggest a bullish trend.

Primary Risks: The stock's high volatility and beta value above market average may lead to increased risk for traders. Additionally, the lack of recent news headlines adds uncertainty to the analysis.

Investment Thesis: With a neutral sentiment and no clear catalysts, SINT appears poised for further consolidation or a potential breakout/breakdown. Traders should consider positioning themselves around key levels and monitoring volume patterns.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: The absence of recent news headlines reduces the impact on the stock's price movement, making technical analysis more relevant.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction:

  • Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
  • Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral
  • Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish

Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels to monitor are the SMA 20 at $4.32 and the Bollinger Bands' upper level at $4.96.

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Neutral (47.07)
  • MACD signal: Bullish
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral

Volume Analysis: Volume trends indicate a potential reversal, with a volume rate of change of -72.17%.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available.

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no recent news).

Catalyst Identification: The next earnings report on November 10, 2025, may provide a catalyst for price movement.

Market Narrative: The lack of recent news headlines reduces the market narrative's impact on the stock's price movement. Technical signals remain more relevant.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock with a beta value above market average (1.13).

Volatility Regime: Above-average volatility (Stock Volatility: 1.45).

Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.

Downside Protection: Monitor the SMA 20 and Bollinger Bands' lower level at $3.68 for potential support.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: No sector data available.

Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no specific activity is apparent.

Correlation Analysis: Correlation with market index (0.15) suggests SINT moves in tandem with the market, amplifying its movements.

Relative Valuation: Position within a trading range, with potential for consolidation or breakout/breakdown.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 at $4.32 and Bollinger Bands' upper level at $4.96.

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Potential breakouts above $4.96 or breakdowns below $3.68.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Next earnings report on November 10, 2025.

Risk Management: Monitor volume patterns and position sizing to manage risk.

Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and may not reflect the actual stock performance.

Generated

SINT Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 1.7385
Alpha: -85.30%
Correlation: 0.3114
R-Squared: 9.7%
Stock Volatility: 71.1%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SINT
1 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$60K
0.00%
#5960 of 6285new13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

SINT Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

20 filers1,011,329 shares$1.95M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Bleichroeder LP 523,013 $978.03K 50.22% — 2026-06-30
2 Stonepine Capital Management, LLC 209,205 $332.53K 17.07% — 2026-06-30
3 Vanguard Group Inc Custodian 44,436 $171.52K 8.81% — 2025-12-31
4 Veracity Capital LLC 76,674 $170.98K 8.78% — 2026-09-30
5 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 31,930 $59.71K 3.07% — 2026-06-30
6 Geode Capital Management, LLC Custodian 30,101 $56.29K 2.89% — 2026-06-30
7 Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co 23,531 $44.00K 2.26% — 2026-06-30
8 Vanguard Capital Management LLC 20,905 $39.09K 2.01% — 2026-06-30
9 State Street Corp 13,302 $24.88K 1.28% — 2026-06-30
10 HRT FINANCIAL LP 12,831 $23.00K 1.18% — 2026-06-30
11 UBS Group AG Custodian 11,921 $22.29K 1.14% — 2026-06-30
12 Virtus Wealth Solutions LLC 10,000 $18.70K 0.96% — 2026-06-30
13 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) Custodian 2,850 $5.33K 0.27% — 2026-06-30
14 SIGNATUREFD, LLC 573 $1.28K 0.07% — 2026-09-30
15 SBI Securities Co., Ltd. 14 $31 <0.01% — 2026-09-30
16 Morgan Stanley Custodian 1 $2 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
17 National Bank of Canada Custodian 1 $2 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
18 Allworth Financial LP Custodian 1 $2 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
19 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 1 $2 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
20 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 39 $0 0.00% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

SINT Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2026-04-14
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2026-04-14 Robert Ryan Elmore President Award (A) +4,910 $2.88 $14.2K EDGAR
2026-03-18 Robert Ryan Elmore President Grant (A) +107,143 RSU — EDGAR
2026-03-10 Christopher Michael Lyons Director Buy (P) +8,292 $2.91 $24.1K EDGAR
2026-02-25 Jay M Moyes Director Buy (P) +1,000 $2.91 $2.9K EDGAR
2026-02-19 Mark Lewis Anderson Director Buy (P) +3,000 $3.02 $9.1K EDGAR
2026-02-10 Eric K. Olson Chairman, President and CEO Grant (A) +100,000 RSU — EDGAR
2026-02-10 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer Grant (A) +75,000 RSU — EDGAR
2026-02-10 Kevin Trask Chief Financial Officer Grant (A) +60,000 RSU — EDGAR
2025-12-09 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer Buy (P) +8,200 $4.26 $34.9K EDGAR
2025-12-08 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer Mixed +118,867 $3.93 $255.3K EDGAR
2025-11-10 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer Buy (P) +10,000 $3.19 $31.9K EDGAR
2025-10-21 Eric K. Olson President and CEO Buy (P) +5,800 $3.40 $19.7K EDGAR
2025-09-05 Kevin Trask Chief Financial Officer Grant (A) +70,000 RSU — EDGAR
2025-08-27 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer Buy (P) +50,000 $3.70 $185.0K EDGAR
2025-08-27 Jay M Moyes Director Buy (P) +3,000 $3.59 $10.8K EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

SINT Insider Holdings

6 insiders · @ $1.56
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Gregg R. Honigblum Chief Investment Officer 201,067 $313.7K $532.0K 7 2026-02-10
2 Eric K. Olson Chairman, President and CEO 30,775 $48.0K $85.3K 4 2026-02-10
3 Mark Lewis Anderson Director 18,000 $28.1K $53.9K 3 2026-02-19
4 Christopher Michael Lyons Director 8,292 $12.9K $24.1K 1 2026-03-10
5 Robert Ryan Elmore President 4,910 $7.7K $0 2 2026-04-14
6 Jay M Moyes Director 4,000 $6.2K $13.7K 2 2026-02-25
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

SINT Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Apr 14, 2026

Directors 5

Officers 4

Changes in the last 10 years (9)
Mar 18, 2026Robert Ryan Elmore first on file as President
Mar 10, 2026Christopher Michael Lyons first on file as a director
Sep 4, 2025Kevin Trask became Chief Financial Officer
Aug 27, 2025Jay M Moyes no longer listed as Chief Fnancial Officer in SEC filings
Aug 27, 2025Gregg R. Honigblum listed as Chief Investment Officer (previously Chief Strategy Officer) in SEC filings
May 14, 2025Mark Lewis Anderson first on file as a director
Nov 15, 2024Gregg R. Honigblum became a director
Nov 15, 2024Gregg R. Honigblum became Chief Strategy Officer
Jul 9, 2019David Francis O'Brien became Chief Operating Officer
Not reported recently (5)
  • Bhajanjit Bal · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2023
  • Jeffrey S. White · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2023
  • David W. Truetzel · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2022
  • Eric A Stookey · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2022
  • David Francis O'Brien · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Sep 1, 2020
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.

SINT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)

Latest: 2025-02-27
Last 30d: 0 filings  ·  Last 90d: 0 filings

What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.

How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.

10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.

"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.

Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.

Filed Filer Role Shares Notice Value Planned Sale Broker Plan Link
2025-02-27 Tate Kerry 10% Stockholder 157,249 $688.8K 2025-02-27 Charles Schwab Corp. — EDGAR
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold SINT
1 shown · $46.62K total exposure
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
1 VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF Vanguard 0.00% $46,618 — 2026-09-30
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.