Zacks Investment ResearchT3·17h ago
SLMBP SLM Corporation Floating-Rate Non-Cumulative Series B
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SLMBP
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PERSONAL CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (6141) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 1,788
- List Date
- 2005-07-11
- CIK
- 0001032033
- Headquarters
- Newark, DE
- Homepage
- https://www.salliemae.com
SLM Corp is an education solutions company. Its business is to originate and service loans to students and their families to finance the cost of their education. The term' Private Education Loans to mean education loans to students or their families that are not made, insured, or guaranteed by any state or federal government.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.55% | -2.67% | 11.82% | 3.67% | 1.38% | 0.19% | 2.31% |
| Feb | -2.23% | -1.40% | -0.54% | 2.90% | 1.19% | 0.07% | -0.00% |
| Mar | 1.86% | 3.93% | -3.45% | 5.46% | -2.76% | -2.42% | 0.44% |
| Apr | 2.94% | -0.74% | 1.74% | 4.59% | 0.10% | 0.40% | 1.50% |
| May | 1.97% | -0.52% | -10.80% | 2.74% | 5.10% | -0.28% | -0.30% |
| Jun | 2.83% | -0.18% | 0.27% | -1.90% | -9.19% | -1.35% | -1.59% |
| Jul | 1.06% | 4.30% | 6.87% | 0.67% | 3.20% | 1.05% | 2.86% |
| Aug | 0.65% | 1.86% | 5.82% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.98% | 1.61% |
| Sep | -0.26% | -2.43% | 0.44% | -3.18% | 0.22% | -1.36% | -1.09% |
| Oct | 0.11% | 3.85% | 6.66% | -1.19% | 0.65% | -1.03%* | 1.51% |
| Nov | -5.49% | 2.39% | 2.63% | 1.52% | -1.68% | -- | -0.13% |
| Dec | -2.94% | -0.78% | -1.78% | -1.66% | -2.27% | -- | -1.89% |
| Total | -0.40% | 7.51% | 19.33% | 14.03% | -4.37% | -3.74% | 5.39% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $73.45
SMA 50: $74.25
SMA 200: $74.47
Current: $72.99
EMA 12: $72.95
EMA 26: $73.48
MACD: -0.5269 | Signal: -0.1045
BEARISH
ADX (14): 35.56
TREND
+DI: 22.23
−DI: 31.52
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 44.83
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 31.10
Stoch %D: 21.45
Williams %R: -37.70
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $74.90
BB Lower: $71.99
NEUTRAL
OBV: -23,045
Vol SMA 20: 1,800
Vol ROC: -79.40%
ATR: $0.70
True Range: $1.63
HV 20: 10.0%
HV 30: 10.7%
HV 60: 8.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-09-27T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is the LLM Stock Analysis report for SLMBP:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical indicators suggest a strong trend, but recent news headlines are bearish.
- Beta is low, indicating low volatility relative to the market.
Investment Thesis: SLMBP's stock price has been trending upward, but recent negative news headlines have created uncertainty. Further analysis suggests that the company's fundamentals may be stronger than the current share price implies. However, caution is advised due to the bearish news sentiment and potential class-action lawsuits.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The majority of recent news headlines are negative, which has likely contributed to the stock's decline.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL Medium-term (1-3 months): BULLISH Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower support level: $74.42 (Bollinger Band lower boundary)
- Upper resistance level: $75.22 (Bollinger Band upper boundary)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (50.47)
- MACD signal: BULLISH (0.07 / -0.01 / 0.08)
- Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL
Volume Analysis: Volume has been decreasing, indicating a lack of institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The majority of recent news headlines are negative, focusing on class-action lawsuits and investor harm.
Sentiment Assessment: AGGREGATE SENTIMENT IS NEGATIVE (67.5% negative, 32.5% neutral)
Catalyst Identification: No significant catalysts have been identified in the near-term, but upcoming earnings announcements may impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: The bearish news sentiment has likely influenced the company's stock price, creating uncertainty for investors.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta is low (0.04), indicating low volatility relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is relatively low compared to historical levels.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are in place, but caution is advised due to the bearish news sentiment and potential class-action lawsuits.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: SLM's sector performance has been mixed, with some peers experiencing similar declines.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest a lack of institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively less than the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.04).
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range is uncertain due to recent news headlines and technical signals.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support level at $74.42 (Bollinger Band lower boundary) and resistance level at $75.22 (Bollinger Band upper boundary)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No significant breakout or breakdown levels have been identified in the near-term.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcements may impact the stock price in the near-term.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $74.42, and position sizing considerations are advised due to the bearish news sentiment and potential class-action lawsuits.
Please note that this is just a sample analysis and not an actual buy or sell recommendation.
Generated
News
All SLMBP news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
SLMBP Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.0499
Alpha: -3.52%
Correlation: 0.0716
R-Squared: 0.5%
Stock Volatility: 9.0%
Market Volatility: 12.9%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 236
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 236
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
SLMBP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SLMBP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-18Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | Mary Carter Warren Franke | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Christopher T. Leech | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | James D. Matheson | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Vivian C. Schneck-Last | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Kirsten O. Wolberg | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Ted Manvitz | Director | Award (A) | +8,411 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Henry F Greig | Director | Award (A) | +8,438 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Daniel Greenstein | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Janaki Akella | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Gary Millerchip | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Richard Scott Blackley | Director | Award (A) | +8,547 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Mark L Lavelle | Director | Award (A) | +7,349 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Steven Allen Turner | EVP, Chief Tech. & Enablement | Award (A) | +29,438 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Nicolas Jafarieh | EVP -Legal, Govt, Comm Officer | Gift (G) | −5,488 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-02 | Steven Allen Turner | EVP, Chief Tech. & Enablement | Award (A) | +58,877 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SLMBP Insider Holdings
20 insiders · @ $72.99
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan W. Witter | CEO | 1,442,288 | $105.27M | $0 | 22 | 2026-03-04 |
| 2 | Nicolas Jafarieh | EVP -Legal, Govt, Comm Officer | 285,354 | $20.83M | -$560.1K | 39 | 2026-05-05 |
| 3 | Donna F Vieira | EVP & Chief Commercial Officer | 179,358 | $13.09M | -$695.5K | 23 | 2025-12-03 |
| 4 | Kerri A. Palmer | EVP, Chief Operational Officer | 172,633 | $12.60M | -$2.57M | 17 | 2026-03-04 |
| 5 | Peter M Graham | EVP, CFO | 152,338 | $11.12M | $0 | 8 | 2026-03-04 |
| 6 | Mary Carter Warren Franke | Director | 111,998 | $8.17M | $105.2K | 14 | 2026-06-18 |
| 7 | James D. Matheson | Director | 111,836 | $8.16M | $0 | 17 | 2026-06-18 |
| 8 | Vivian C. Schneck-Last | Director | 98,945 | $7.22M | $0 | 13 | 2026-06-18 |
| 9 | Munish Pahwa | EVP & Chief Risk Officer | 87,075 | $6.36M | -$450.5K | 9 | 2026-03-04 |
| 10 | Mark L Lavelle | Director | 85,764 | $6.26M | $0 | 21 | 2026-06-18 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold SLMBP
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.