TOMZ TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS (2860) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 20
- List Date
- 2008-06-17
- CIK
- 0000314227
- Last Earnings
- Aug 14
- Next Earnings
- ~Nov 13, 2026 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- Frederick, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.tomimist.com
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc is a leader in bacteria decontamination and infectious disease control, offering environmentally friendly solutions for indoor air and surface disinfection and decontamination. Its flagship product, SteraMist, uses patented and registered Binary Ionization Technology (BIT) to deliver a low-percentage hydrogen peroxide-based fog or mist to affect all indoor environments and surface areas. The product portfolio of the company includes The SteraPak, The Surface Unit, SteraMist Transport, The NV+, The Environment System, and others.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.23% | -36.42% | 49.09% | -30.00% | -6.45% | -6.37% | -4.99% |
| Feb | -10.74% | -9.57% | -18.87% | 0.04% | -7.28% | -8.56% | -9.16% |
| Mar | -12.34% | -10.13% | -2.13% | -9.72% | -5.42% | -12.18% | -8.65% |
| Apr | -17.51% | -12.69% | 5.84% | -3.95% | -3.23% | 14.98% | -2.76% |
| May | -21.79% | 22.96% | -26.87% | 38.04% | 7.50% | 34.78% | 9.10% |
| Jun | 7.87% | -22.99% | 25.47% | 13.84% | -4.89% | -22.32% | -0.50% |
| Jul | -19.32% | 18.38% | 20.65% | -8.64% | -11.82% | -36.81% | -6.26% |
| Aug | -25.43% | -22.14% | 48.79% | 15.75% | -15.37% | -5.17% | -0.60% |
| Sep | -21.55% | -10.49% | -18.30% | -3.94% | 23.17% | -22.09% | -8.87% |
| Oct | -2.94% | 2.34% | 9.70% | 16.56% | -7.86% | 41.91% | 9.95% |
| Nov | 34.11% | -5.56% | 8.60% | -12.80% | -13.57% | 12.04%* | 3.80% |
| Dec | -11.76% | -25.47% | -2.88% | 46.77% | -0.01% | -- | 1.33% |
| Total | -70.41% | -74.61% | 95.09% | 44.61% | -40.59% | -32.81% | -13.12% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: TOMZ
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
Key drivers:
- Recent positive news headlines regarding the merger with Carbonium Core, Inc.
- Low volatility relative to market (beta = 0.41)
Primary risks:
- Mixed signals from technical indicators
- No earnings data available for recent periods
Investment thesis: TOMZ is a mid-cap company operating in the environmental solutions space. The recent news headlines regarding the merger with Carbonium Core, Inc. suggest potential long-term growth opportunities. However, the stock's low volatility and lack of recent earnings data require caution.
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral (no significant impact on recent price action)
Technical Analysis
Trend direction:
- Short-term: Range-bound
- Medium-term: Uptrend
- Long-term: Bullish momentum building
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper: $1.84
- Middle: $1.73
- Lower: $1.61
Momentum signals:
- RSI: Neutral (45.22)
- MACD: Bearish (signal line: 0.01, histogram: -0.07)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral (width: 13.37)
Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 23503.56
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 10976583.27
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent headlines summary:
- Positive news regarding the merger with Carbonium Core, Inc.
- Neutral news about quarterly financial results conference call
Sentiment assessment: Neutral (50% positive, 25% neutral, 25% negative)
Catalyst identification: Upcoming earnings release and merger completion
Market narrative: The recent news headlines suggest potential long-term growth opportunities. However, the mixed technical signals and lack of recent earnings data require caution.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk assessment:
- Beta: 0.41 (low volatility)
- Alpha: -0.23
- Correlation: 0.07
- Stock volatility: 0.77
Volatility regime: Low volatility
Options market signals:
- IV rank: N/A (no options data available)
Downside protection: Support levels and risk management considerations
Market Context & Positioning
Sector performance: Environmental solutions sector is experiencing moderate growth
Institutional activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest
Correlation analysis: TOMZ has a low correlation with the market (0.07)
Relative valuation: Position within trading range
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical price levels:
- Support: $1.61
- Resistance: $1.84
Breakout/breakdown levels:
- Buy signal above $1.84
- Sell signal below $1.61
Time-sensitive catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings release and merger completion
Risk management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations
TOMZ Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $90K | #5832 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TOMZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 2 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
TOMZ Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-04-23| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | Harold Paul | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.55 | $5.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | Boh Soon Lim | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.55 | $5.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | Francesco Fragasso | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.55 | $5.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Francesco Fragasso | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.79 | $15.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Boh Soon Lim | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.79 | $7.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Harold Paul | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.79 | $15.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-08 | David Cecil Vanston | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +100,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-13 | Kelly Anderson | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.85 | $17.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-13 | Boh Soon Lim | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.85 | $17.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-13 | Walter C Johnsen | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.85 | $17.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-17 | Walter C Johnsen | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.75 | $15.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-17 | Elissa Jessica Shane | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +50,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-05-17 | Boh Soon Lim | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.75 | $15.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-17 | Kelly Anderson | Director | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.75 | $15.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-17 | Dr. Halden Stuart Shane | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
TOMZ Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $2.42| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boh Soon Lim | Director | 69,508 | $168.2K | $0 | 7 | 2026-04-23 |
| 2 | Walter C Johnsen | Director | 43,458 | $105.2K | $0 | 5 | 2025-05-13 |
| 3 | Kelly Anderson | Director | 43,458 | $105.2K | $0 | 5 | 2025-05-13 |
| 4 | David Cecil Vanston | Chief Financial Officer | 33,333 | $80.7K | $0 | 1 | 2025-10-08 |
| 5 | Harold Paul | Secretary | 30,433 | $73.6K | $0 | 3 | 2026-04-23 |
| 6 | Francesco Fragasso | Director | 10,000 | $24.2K | $0 | 2 | 2026-04-23 |
TOMZ Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through May 22, 2026Directors 3
- Harold Paul · since Feb 1, 2016
- Boh Soon Lim · since Feb 5, 2018
- Francesco Fragasso · since Sep 11, 2025
Officers 1
- Niroshan Srirathan · Interim CFO · since May 16, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (17)
| May 16, 2026 | Niroshan Srirathan became Interim CFO |
| Oct 7, 2025 | Harold Paul no longer listed as Secretary in SEC filings |
| Sep 26, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Kelly Anderson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 11, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Walter C Johnsen from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Francesco Fragasso became a director |
| Jun 5, 2025 | David Cecil Vanston became CFO |
| Dec 11, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Joseph Frank Rzepka JR as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| May 15, 2024 | Joseph Frank Rzepka JR became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 27, 2023 | Elissa Jessica Shane first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jan 9, 2019 | Harold Paul first listed as Secretary in an SEC filing |
| Feb 5, 2018 | Boh Soon Lim became a director |
| Jan 24, 2018 | Environmental Solutions Holding Pte. Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 22, 2018 | Sok Huy Lau became a 10% owner |
| Jan 5, 2018 | Elissa Jessica Shane became Chief Operating Officer |
| Aug 2, 2017 | Arise Asset Management Pte Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 1, 2017 | Environmental Solutions Holding Pte. Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2017 | Ron E Ainsworth became a director |
Not reported recently (6)
- David Cecil Vanston · Last reported as CFO in an SEC filing dated Oct 8, 2025
- Elissa Jessica Shane · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 19, 2024
- Dr. Halden Stuart Shane · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 17, 2024
- Nick Jennings · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 27, 2023
- Ron E Ainsworth · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 6, 2018
- Sok Huy Lau · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 24, 2018
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-21 | Agreement terminated · Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-20 | Bylaws or fiscal year change | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | Shareholder vote results | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 | 0001654954-26-007620 | EDGAR |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
TOMZ vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFF International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | $20.7B | 111.1 | −1.9% | +24.1% | 16 |
| LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. Class A | $19.6B | 15.0 | +3.5% | +34.0% | 26 |
| WLK Westlake Corporation | $8.1B | — | −0.4% | −13.5% | 48 |
| NEU NewMarket Corporation | $6.4B | 14.0 | +0.9% | +0.6% | 79 |
| MEOH Methanex Corp | $5.1B | — | — | +63.2% | 0 |
| SXT Sensient Technology Corporation | $5.1B | 30.6 | +9.5% | +30.2% | 11 |
| REX REX American Resources Corp. | $1.3B | 11.1 | +5.3% | +24.9% | 64 |
| GPRE Green Plains, Inc. | $927M | 8.7 | −23.7% | +35.9% | 19 |
| TOMZ TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. | $17M | — | — | +2.1% | — |
| Peer median | $5.8B | 14.5 | +0.9% | +27.6% | 23 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.