The Motley FoolT3·1mo ago
XNET Xunlei Limited
XNAS 5.01 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
XNET
$5.01
—
Key stats
$5.01
- 52-Week Range
- $4.52 – $9.99
- YTD
- -30.99%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.48
- Straddle Price
- $0.85
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- Open
- $4.83
- Day Range
- $4.83 – $5.05
- Volume
- 212,382
- Prev Close
- $4.81
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.27% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.17 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.73% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.31% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +59.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $4.98 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $4.88 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 188.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
Peers used for multiples: ATAT, BABA, JOYY, OMAB, PAGS, TSM, TV
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
72%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 9, 2026
$4.93
α -1.6%
rank 49%
conviction
83%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$4.84
α -3.3%
rank 49%
conviction
86%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$4.88
α -2.6%
rank 49%
conviction
72%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $4.98 | 100% | stability 73% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $4.71 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew +0.45 |
As of 2026-10-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- Employees
- 1,306
- List Date
- 2014-06-24
- CIK
- 0001510593
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- Homepage
- https://www.xunlei.com
Xunlei Ltd is a technology company providing distributed cloud services in China. It operates a powerful internet platform in China based on cloud technology to enable its users to quickly access, store, manage and consume digital media content on the internet. The company has expanded its products and services from PC-based devices to mobile devices in part through pre-installed acceleration products in mobile phones to further enlarge its user base and offer its users a wider range of access points. It provides a wide range of products and services across cloud acceleration and digital enter…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 51.83% | -11.71% | 10.64% | -6.21% | 18.10% | -15.29% | 7.89% |
| Feb | 33.54% | -5.00% | -17.29% | -0.25% | 53.78% | -7.44% | 9.56% |
| Mar | -10.53% | 2.92% | -2.65% | -1.97% | 25.77% | -2.97% | 1.76% |
| Apr | -20.15% | -23.20% | -13.19% | 0.68% | -10.21% | 2.53% | -10.59% |
| May | -5.46% | -10.64% | -14.92% | 16.77% | 33.57% | -1.94% | 2.90% |
| Jun | -12.64% | 31.67% | 44.53% | -7.18% | -26.76% | -6.44% | 3.86% |
| Jul | -19.11% | 4.32% | 3.02% | 4.24% | 6.94% | -9.18% | -1.63% |
| Aug | 0.81% | 1.90% | -14.29% | -2.11% | 63.95% | -8.53% | 6.96% |
| Sep | -24.93% | -11.46% | -3.57% | 17.09% | 31.10% | 0.10% | 1.39% |
| Oct | 0.00% | -28.11% | -12.88% | 9.73% | -8.62% | 7.97%* | -5.32% |
| Nov | -21.67% | 88.00% | 9.78% | 3.40% | -16.99% | -- | 12.50% |
| Dec | -14.10% | -3.70% | 4.52% | -7.01% | -0.84% | -- | -4.23% |
| Total | -50.72% | -4.44% | -19.06% | 26.16% | 246.88% | -35.75% | 27.18% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $4.88
SMA 50: $4.97
SMA 200: $5.79
Current: $5.01
EMA 12: $4.85
EMA 26: $4.90
MACD: -0.0450 | Signal: 0.0139
BEARISH
ADX (14): 29.00
TREND
+DI: 17.51
−DI: 20.96
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 55.77
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 59.77
Stoch %D: 50.00
Williams %R: -17.24
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $5.11
BB Lower: $4.65
NEUTRAL
OBV: 61,903,618
Vol SMA 20: 206,017
Vol ROC: 21.56%
ATR: $0.17
True Range: $0.24
HV 20: 27.5%
HV 30: 26.0%
HV 60: 42.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-11T00:00:00 – 2026-10-09T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: XNET
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD signal
- High volatility, beta >1.2, and risk relative to market
- Negative news sentiment from recent headlines
Primary Risks:
- Continued bearish momentum
- High volatility and potential for sudden price movements
- Earnings misses or negative guidance
Investment Thesis: Xunlei (XNET) is experiencing a bearish trend due to its high beta, volatility, and negative news sentiment. The stock may continue to decline unless there is a significant shift in market conditions or positive fundamental developments.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines are mostly neutral or slightly bearish, which aligns with the current technical signals.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Bearish (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Neutral (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Bullish (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: The key price levels to monitor are $4.77 (lower Bollinger Band), $4.99 (SMA 20), and $5.21 (upper Bollinger Band).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (44.63)
- MACD signal: Bearish (-0.12 / Signal: 0.01)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating potential for increased volatility
Volume Analysis: The volume trends suggest institutional interest and a potential bounce from the current price level.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent headlines are mostly neutral or slightly bearish, with no significant catalysts identified.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL (4/5), with some positive headlines offset by negative ones.
Catalyst Identification: There are no immediate catalysts identified. However, the upcoming earnings call could impact the stock's price.
Market Narrative: The recent news sentiment and technical signals align to suggest a continuation of the bearish trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The beta is high (2.07), indicating that XNET is more volatile than the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are moderate, with some signs of increased volatility in the near-term future.
Options Market Signals: The IV rank is low (18.1%), indicating historically low volatility. The current IV is 102.8%, suggesting a potential move to the downside.
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations suggest setting stop-loss levels around $4.77, with a target price of $5.21.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: XNET's sector (Technology) has been performing well recently, but the stock itself is lagging behind.
Institutional Activity: The institutional activity suggests some interest in the stock, which could lead to a potential bounce from the current price level.
Correlation Analysis: The correlation analysis indicates that XNET moves more independently than the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: XNET's relative valuation is slightly below its peers, suggesting some value at the current price level.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $4.77
- Resistance: $5.21
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout: $5.34 (SMA 50)
- Breakdown: $4.49 (lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: The upcoming earnings call and product launch could impact the stock's price.
Risk Management: Set stop-loss levels around $4.77, with a target price of $5.21. Consider scaling in or out based on market conditions.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news headlines, and risk metrics, we conclude that Xunlei (XNET) is experiencing a bearish trend due to its high beta, volatility, and negative news sentiment. The stock may continue to decline unless there is a significant shift in market conditions or positive fundamental developments.
Generated
News
All XNET news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·3mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·11mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·14mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·16mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·17mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·19mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·21mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 36
Page 1 of 4
XNET Options Activity & IV Rank
XNET IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 80.1%
7-DTE IV: 100.1%
Expected Move: $0.85
7-DTE Move: $0.32
Days to Exp: 42 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 3,007
Put Volume: 3
P/C Volume: 0.001
BULLISH
Call OI: 3,001
Put OI: 3
P/C OI: 0.001
Total OI: 3,004
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.38
ATM Put: $0.47
Call %: 7.5%
Put %: 9.5%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 3,864
Chain OI: 13,906
Last Updated: 10/9/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 12th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
12%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.41
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.46
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.51
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.46: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt +0.51: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 5 ATM contracts, 2k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 9 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 9 · No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)25.2MediumOct 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)44.5MediumOct 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.85Oct 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.0143
Alpha: -85.70%
Correlation: 0.4732
R-Squared: 22.4%
Stock Volatility: 55.5%
Market Volatility: 13.0%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own XNET
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $311K | #5021 of 6285 | -51.0% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $297K | #2778 of 3138 | -40.6% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $119K | #3592 of 3717 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1K | #4597 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
XNET Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 316,458,713 (as of 2025-12-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
4 filers$905.22K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $290.08K | 32.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $240.03K | 26.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $201.42K | 22.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $173.69K | 19.19% | 2025-09-30 |
4 filers$1.96M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $839.44K | 42.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $743.58K | 37.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $271.11K | 13.84% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $104.63K | 5.34% | 2026-06-30 |
ETF Holders
3 ETFs hold XNET
3 shown · $304.41K total exposure
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '18 | 2018-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '17 | 2017-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '16 | 2016-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '15 | 2015-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '14 | 2014-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-12-31 • filed 2026-04-28
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
1.07M
SI % of Float
1.67%
Days to Cover
5.20
Short Vol Ratio
36.1%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-09