ZTWO F/m 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
F/m 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2024-01-10
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.15% prospectus, filed Jan 5, 2026
- Assets
- $18M SEC filing, May 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 4.18% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $67K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 445 top 10 are 2.3%
- Listed
- Jan 10, 2024 Nasdaq
Moves with. Long Treasuries (9% of its variance, beta 0.04); US large-cap stocks (4% of its variance, beta 0.03); US dollar (4% of its variance, beta -0.04); High yield over Treasuries (3% of its variance, beta -0.07). These factors explain 25% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
Stated objective. The investment objective of the F/m 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (the F/m 2Y Bond Fund or the Fund) is to seek investment results that correspond (before fees and expenses) generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg US Liquid Corporate 2 Year Maturity Index (I39297US) (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 445 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Investment-Grade Corporate ETFs
- May 2026
- $0 latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$620 0.0% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$12M −66.8% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | +$620 |
| Feb 2026 | +$140 |
| Jan 2026 | −$2.0M |
| Dec 2025 | −$2K |
| Nov 2025 | −$1K |
| Oct 2025 | +$304 |
| Sep 2025 | −$2K |
| Jul 2025 | −$2.0M |
| Jun 2025 | +$2.0M |
| May 2025 | −$10M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 28 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCITVanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | — | 0.03% | $67.6B | −6.1% | compare |
| LQDiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | — | 0.14% | $29.7B | −7.4% | compare |
| IGIBiShares Trust iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | — | 0.04% | $19.5B | −6.1% | compare |
| USIGiShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | — | 0.04% | $18.0B | −5.9% | compare |
| SPIBState Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | — | 0.04% | $11.4B | −4.3% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Investment-Grade Corporate category.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-29 | $0.1817 | CD |
| 2026-08-27 | 2026-08-28 | $0.1815 | CD |
| 2026-07-28 | 2026-07-29 | $0.1815 | CD |
| 2026-06-29 | 2026-06-30 | $0.1656 | CD |
| 2026-05-28 | 2026-05-29 | $0.1732 | CD |
| 2026-04-28 | 2026-04-29 | $0.1785 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | NUTRIEN LTD | 0.23% | Debt | CA |
| — | HYATT HOTELS CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOF | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | XYLEM INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | REALTY INCOME CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | GATX CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | HERSHEY COMPANY | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | MASTERCARD INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | STATE STREET CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | KIMCO REALTY OP LLC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | SIMON PROPERTY GROUP LP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | BOEING CO | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | XCEL ENERGY INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | COCA-COLA CO/THE | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | AT&T INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | EOG RESOURCES INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSNG | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | CTR PARTNERSHIP/CARETRST | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | BLOCK FINANCIAL LLC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | AMEREN CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | ESSEX PORTFOLIO LP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | ABBOTT LABORATORIES | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | BLUE OWL TECHNOLOGY FINA | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | WESTERN-SOUTHERN GLOBAL | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | TOLL BROS FINANCE CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | SABINE PASS LIQUEFACTION | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | REGENCY CENTERS LP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL FDG | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | CONTINENTAL RESOURCES | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | STORE CAPITAL LLC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | MACQUARIE BANK LTD | 0.23% | Debt | AU |
| — | 7-ELEVEN INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | TORONTO-DOMINION BANK | 0.23% | Debt | CA |
| — | CONSTELLATION EN GEN LLC | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate | 98.75% | $17.9M | 443 |
| Short-term investment | 0.35% | $64305 | 2 |
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.15% | 0.49% | 0.03% | 0.22% |
| Feb | -0.36% | 0.78% | 0.05% | 0.16% |
| Mar | 0.35% | 0.28% | -0.77% | -0.05% |
| Apr | -0.19% | 0.58% | -0.04% | 0.12% |
| May | 0.59% | 0.32% | -0.03% | 0.29% |
| Jun | 0.34% | 0.72% | -0.04% | 0.34% |
| Jul | 1.26% | 0.13% | -0.27% | 0.37% |
| Aug | 0.82% | 0.36% | -0.06% | 0.37% |
| Sep | 0.79% | 0.46% | -1.06% | 0.06% |
| Oct | -0.57% | 0.17% | 0.41%* | 0.00% |
| Nov | 0.59% | 0.45% | -- | 0.52% |
| Dec | -0.19% | -0.22% | -- | -0.21% |
| Total | 3.62% | 4.61% | -1.77% | 2.15% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: ZTWO
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals are mixed, with a bearish MACD signal and neutral RSI reading
- Recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events
- Low volatility and beta indicate a relatively stable stock
Investment Thesis: ZTWO is a moderately volatile stock trading within a range. The recent lack of market-moving news and mixed technical signals suggest a wait-and-see approach.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
- The neutral news headline from MarketWatch has had no significant impact on the stock price or sentiment
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Range-bound (1-4 weeks)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $50.14
- Middle Bollinger Band: $50.33
- Upper Bollinger Band: $50.52
- SMA 20: $50.33
- SMA 50: $50.35
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 36.50 (neutral)
- MACD signal: -0.02 / Histogram: -0.03 (bearish)
- Bollinger Bands position: neutral
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest a lack of institutional interest, with a declining volume rate of change.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines have dominated the past week, with no significant market-moving events.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (60%)
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or product launches announced.
Market Narrative: The lack of significant news and mixed technical signals suggest a wait-and-see approach.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low volatility - stock moves less than market (beta: 0.02)
Volatility Regime: Historical volatility is relatively high, but current volatility is low.
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels are provided by the Lower Bollinger Band and SMA 20.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ZTWO's performance has been modestly positive within its sector.
Institutional Activity: A lack of institutional interest is evident from the declining volume rate of change.
Correlation Analysis: ZTWO has a relatively low correlation with the broader market (R-squared: 0.19).
Relative Valuation: ZTWO trades near the lower end of its historical range, suggesting some value.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($50.14), Middle Bollinger Band ($50.33)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Upper Bollinger Band ($50.52) and SMA 20 ($50.33)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or product launches announced.
Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss levels at the Lower Bollinger Band ($50.14) for risk management.
ZTWO Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
ZTWO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|