BALT vs PQOC

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
19 bp
PQOC is cheaper
1-year return gap
9.5 pts
PQOC is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.0B

Side by side

BALTPQOC
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.50%
Assets$3.0B$27M
Average daily dollar volume$21M$105K
ListedJun 30, 2021Dec 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score6231
1-month return+1.2%+2.5%
3-month return+2.1%+5.1%
Year to date+4.7%+14.4%
1-year return+6.8%+16.3%
30-day volatility3.0%4.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.00%
Holdings510
Top 10 weight101.3%103.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$3.4M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility14.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · PQOC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.