BDVG vs FITZ

IMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF against Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
29%
10 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
BDVG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FITZ
$76M

Side by side

BDVGFITZ
FundIMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETFFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
IssueriMGPFitz-Gerald
CategoryDividend GrowthLarge Cap Blend
Expense ratio0.55%0.75%
Assets$23M$76M
Average daily dollar volume$64K$896K
ListedJun 29, 2023May 27, 2026
FrenzyCap score2527
1-month return+0.4%+6.0%
3-month return+3.3%+8.6%
Year to date+17.0%—
1-year return+17.5%—
30-day volatility10.7%11.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.7%−7.4%
Trailing 12-month yield1.34%0.22%
Holdings4031
Top 10 weight41.0%48.0%
Look-through P/E20.542.2
Holdings vs fair value+1.9%−4.2%
Holdings above 200-day average61%65%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.6M thru Jun 2026+$78M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

30% of BDVG · 36% of FITZ
HoldingBDVGFITZ
JPM4.25%5.51%
ABBV4.11%4.24%
AAPL4.04%4.87%
CVX3.57%3.68%
MSFT2.80%3.22%
LMT2.59%3.98%
WM2.51%3.20%
WMT2.22%3.91%
KMI2.28%2.00%
PG1.28%1.02%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBDVGFITZGap
Technology21.1%39.5%−18.3%
Industrials14.1%13.2%+0.9%
Health Care9.2%12.0%−2.9%
Consumer Discretionary7.4%13.1%−5.7%
Financials14.7%5.5%+9.2%
Utilities7.4%5.2%+2.2%
Energy5.9%6.0%−0.2%
Consumer Staples5.2%1.0%+4.2%
Real Estate1.2%3.5%−2.3%
Materials4.4%0.0%+4.4%

More: full overlap table · BDVG holdings · FITZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.