BUFR vs PQOC

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
45 bp
PQOC is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.1 pts
PQOC is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRPQOC
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October
IssuerFT VestPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.50%
Assets$10.9B$27M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$105K
ListedAug 10, 2020Dec 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score4931
1-month return+2.1%+2.5%
3-month return+3.5%+5.1%
Year to date+10.7%+14.4%
1-year return+13.2%+16.3%
30-day volatility5.2%4.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.00%
Holdings1310
Top 10 weight83.3%103.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026+$3.4M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · PQOC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.