CANE vs DBA

Teucrium Sugar Fund against Invesco DB Agriculture Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
17.9 pts
CANE is ahead
Larger fund
DBA
$1.2B

Side by side

CANEDBA
FundTeucrium Sugar FundInvesco DB Agriculture Fund
IssuerTeucriumInvesco
CategoryAgricultureAgriculture
Expense ratio——
Assets$57M$1.2B
Average daily dollar volume$5.5M$30M
ListedSep 16, 2011Jan 5, 2007
FrenzyCap score4580
1-month return+10.2%−1.8%
3-month return+26.1%−0.2%
Year to date+25.7%+10.4%
1-year return+24.0%+6.1%
30-day volatility23.0%11.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.9%−8.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—3.24%
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility30.6%17.0%
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CANE holdings · DBA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.