CEFS vs QALT

Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF against SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
181 bp
QALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.9 pts
CEFS is ahead
Larger fund
CEFS
$412M

Side by side

CEFSQALT
FundSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETFSEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
IssuerSabaSEI
CategoryMulti-StrategyMulti-Strategy
Expense ratio2.61%0.80%
Assets$412M$194M
Average daily dollar volume$2.5M$382K
ListedMar 20, 2017Jun 30, 2023
FrenzyCap score3744
1-month return−4.6%−2.2%
3-month return−8.6%−3.1%
Year to date+0.8%+3.2%
1-year return+2.3%−0.6%
30-day volatility18.8%5.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−10.9%−4.9%
Trailing 12-month yield7.63%6.82%
Holdings7828
Top 10 weight48.4%57.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$18M thru Aug 2026−$34K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Aug 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CEFS · 0% of QALT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CEFS holdings · QALT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.