QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

QALT — —
Key stats
About

SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
XNAS
Inception
2023-06-30
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingthrough Jun 2026flows, SEC filings
Expense ratio
0.80%
prospectus, filed Jul 29, 2026
Assets
$194M
SEC filing, Jun 30, 2026
Trailing yield
6.82%
paid quarterly
Average daily volume
$382K
30 sessions
Holdings
28
top 10 are 57.3%
Listed
Jun 30, 2023
Nasdaq
Closure risk, 12 months
2.6%
low: trading volume · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
44
how it is built
Cost66
Liquidity19
Scale48
Diversification34

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (16% of its variance, beta 0.21); Emerging markets over US (7% of its variance, beta 0.07); Value over growth (4% of its variance, beta -0.06); Gold (4% of its variance, beta 0.04). These factors explain 36% of its daily moves over the last year.

Stated objective. Long-term capital appreciation. (from the fund's prospectus)

All 28 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Multi-Strategy ETFs

Fund flows
through Jun 2026SEC filings
Jun 2026
+$631K
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
−$34K
−0.0% of assets
Latest 12 months
−$8.3M
−4.3% of assets
Jul 2025: −$635KAug 2025: −$626KAugSep 2025: −$3.2MOct 2025: −$1.3MOctNov 2025: −$1.3MDec 2025: −$3.2M−$3.2MDecJan 2026: $0Feb 2026: +$2.6M+$2.6MFebMar 2026: −$634KApr 2026: −$666KAprMay 2026: $0Jun 2026: +$631KJun
View as a table
Net flows of QALT by month, Jul 2025 to Jun 2026
MonthNet flow
Jun 2026+$631K
May 2026$0
Apr 2026−$666K
Mar 2026−$634K
Feb 2026+$2.6M
Jan 2026$0
Dec 2025−$3.2M
Nov 2025−$1.3M
Oct 2025−$1.3M
Sep 2025−$3.2M
Aug 2025−$626K
Jul 2025−$635K

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 12 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
IALTiShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF—0.99%$7.8B—compare
XOVREntrepreneurShares Series Trust ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF—1.81%$1.4B−6.5%compare
PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF—2.71%$737M−4.1%compare
LALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF—1.18%$446M+6.7%compare
CEFSSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF—2.61%$412M+2.3%compare

The largest other funds in the Multi-Strategy category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Mar 31, 2026SEC census
Authorized participants
1 active
of 8 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
Created · redeemed
$2.6M · $7.1M
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
0%
creations 0% in kind
Creation unit
25,000
shares
Securities lending
authorized, none lent

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-06-30
Holdings
28
AUM
$-87,075,703
Provider
Nport
Inception
2023-06-30
Exchange
XNAS
Data As Of
2026-06-30
Expense Ratio
0.80%
Dividend Yield
6.81%
Distribution
Quarterly
Recent distributions
Ex-Date Pay Date Amount Type
2026-10-05 2026-10-06 $0.1658 CD
2026-07-06 2026-07-07 $0.1522 CD
2026-04-06 2026-04-07 $0.1530 CD
2025-12-29 2025-12-30 $0.6634 CD
2025-12-17 2025-12-18 $0.6195 CD
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 28 of 28 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— N/A 9.59% Derivative (equity) US
— N/A 7.41% Derivative (equity) US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 6.19% Debt US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 6.18% Debt US
— N/A 5.90% Derivative (equity) US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 5.23% Debt US
— N/A 5.00% Derivative (FX) US
— N/A 4.41% Derivative (equity) US
— N/A 4.01% Derivative (equity) US
— N/A 3.39% Derivative (FX) US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2.57% Debt US
— N/A 2.21% Derivative (equity) US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1.89% Debt US
— THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1.74% Debt US
— NOVARTIS FINANCE CORPORATION 1.44% Other US
— GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 1.44% Other US
— THE HOME DEPOT, INC. 1.44% Other US
— Nestle Finance International Ltd. SA 1.09% Other US
— APPLE INC. 1.08% Other US
— Svenska Handelsbanken AB 0.69% Other US
— N/A 0.26% Derivative (FX) US
— N/A 0.00% Short-term investment US
— N/A 0.00% Short-term investment US
— United States of America -13.95% Derivative (interest rate) US
— United States of America -17.08% Derivative (interest rate) US
— N/A -18.05% Derivative (FX) US
— N/A -27.12% Derivative (FX) US
— N/A -41.95% Derivative (interest rate) US
Chart
Seasonality
Month'25'26Avg
Jan--1.95%1.95%
Feb--3.18%3.18%
Mar---3.33%-3.33%
Apr---0.16%-0.16%
May--3.14%3.14%
Jun--1.02%1.02%
Jul---0.34%-0.34%
Aug-0.40%0.69%0.14%
Sep2.20%-0.51%0.85%
Oct1.92%-2.25%-0.17%
Nov0.22%0.00%*0.11%
Dec-3.93%---3.93%
Total-0.11%3.23%1.56%
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $25.91
SMA 50: $26.14
SMA 200: $26.02
Current: $25.74
EMA 12: $25.81
EMA 26: $25.95
MACD: -0.1391 | Signal: -0.0147
BEARISH
ADX (14): 38.18
TREND
+DI: 8.44
−DI: 62.74

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 38.32
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 85.10
Stoch %D: 84.59
Williams %R: -13.28

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $26.24
BB Lower: $25.58
NEUTRAL
OBV: 408,554
Vol SMA 20: 16,152
Vol ROC: 51.14%
ATR: $0.24
True Range: $0.08
HV 20: 5.1%
HV 30: 5.1%
HV 60: 5.8%

Data Summary

Data Points: 304
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-08-25T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: QALT

Executive Summary

Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10.

Key drivers:

  • Technical indicators are mixed, indicating a neutral trend.
  • Recent news sentiment is unclear due to lack of recent headlines.
  • Volatility metrics suggest low risk, aligning with historical trends.

Primary risks:

  • Lack of recent news and earnings data may lead to market indecision.
  • Neutral technical signals could continue if no catalysts emerge.

Investment thesis: QALT's neutral technical trend and low volatility make it a relatively stable investment opportunity. However, the absence of recent news and earnings data creates uncertainty, making it essential to monitor the stock's performance closely.

Recent news sentiment impact: The lack of recent news headlines prevents us from assessing the market narrative or identifying potential catalysts.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Neutral (1-4 weeks), Medium-term (1-3 months)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $26.42 (support)
  • SMA 50: $26.35 (resistance)
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $26.57 (resistance)
  • Lower Bollinger Band: $26.28 (support)

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Neutral (51.31, not overbought or oversold)
  • MACD signal: Bullish (0.03 / Signal: -0.01 / Histogram: 0.04)
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (squeeze)

Volume Analysis: Low volume and no clear institutional interest signals.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: No recent headlines available.

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral due to lack of news sentiment data.

Catalyst Identification: None, as there is no recent earnings or news data available.

Market Narrative: Unclear without recent news and earnings data.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta 0.37).

Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime.

Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.

Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations are essential due to the lack of recent news and earnings data.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: QALT's sector performance is unclear without recent market data.

Institutional Activity: Low volume and no clear institutional interest signals.

Correlation Analysis: Low correlation with SPY (0.58).

Relative Valuation: Neutral within trading range.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20: $26.42 (support)
  • SMA 50: $26.35 (resistance)

Breakout/Breakdown Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $26.57 (resistance)
  • Lower Bollinger Band: $26.28 (support)

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings data availability is crucial for reevaluating the stock's potential.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations are essential due to the lack of recent news and earnings data.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of QALT, highlighting its neutral technical trend, low volatility, and uncertainty surrounding recent news and earnings data. It is essential to monitor the stock's performance closely and consider risk management strategies in the absence of clear catalysts or market signals.

Generated

QALT Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.2548
Alpha: -3.07%
Correlation: 0.4468
R-Squared: 20.0%
Stock Volatility: 7.9%
Market Volatility: 13.8%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

QALT Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

37 filers963,654 shares$25.46M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Merit Financial Group, LLC Custodian 247,950 $6.53M 25.66% — 2026-09-30
2 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 246,018 $6.53M 25.65% — 2026-06-30
3 James Hambro & Partners LLP 110,283 $2.90M 11.40% — 2026-09-30
4 55 North Private Wealth, LLC 92,763 $2.44M 9.60% — 2026-09-30
5 WEALTH ENHANCEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC 46,770 $1.23M 4.83% — 2026-09-30
6 SEI INVESTMENTS CO Custodian 26,295 $697.95K 2.74% — 2026-06-30
7 Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. 19,918 $528.68K 2.08% — 2026-06-30
8 Janney Montgomery Scott LLC 19,641 $521.00K 2.05% — 2026-06-30
9 Stewardship Advisors, LLC 19,306 $508.64K 2.00% — 2026-09-30
10 AMERIFLEX GROUP, INC. 16,440 $436.37K 1.71% — 2026-06-30
11 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 16,065 $423.25K 1.66% — 2026-09-30
12 CORA CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC 15,750 $414.95K 1.63% — 2026-09-30
13 Beacon Pointe Advisors, LLC 13,969 $370.74K 1.46% — 2026-06-30
14 Principal Financial Group, Inc. 13,590 $358.04K 1.41% — 2026-09-30
15 LexAurum Advisors, LLC 10,843 $285.67K 1.12% — 2026-09-30
16 Independent Wealth Network Inc. 9,462 $249.29K 0.98% — 2026-09-30
17 COMPASS CAPITAL CORP /MA/ /ADV 8,353 $222.15K 0.87% — 2026-06-30
18 Advisory Services Network, LLC Custodian 7,936 $210.65K 0.83% — 2026-06-30
19 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 5,653 $150.00K 0.59% — 2026-06-30
20 Global Retirement Partners, LLC 5,004 $132.82K 0.52% — 2026-06-30
21 Innovative Asset Advisors Group, LLC 1,964 $52.13K 0.20% — 2026-06-30
22 WPG Advisers, LLC 1,869 $49.24K 0.19% — 2026-09-30
23 Pinnacle Wealth Planning Services, Inc. 1,764 $46.48K 0.18% — 2026-09-30
24 JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian 1,353 $35.50K 0.14% — 2026-06-30
25 UBS Group AG Custodian 1,146 $30.42K 0.12% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month