CMF vs RMCA
iShares California Muni Bond ETF against Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
47 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.0 pts
CMF is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$4.9B
Side by side
| CMF | RMCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares California Muni Bond ETF | Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Rockefeller |
| Category | State Muni | State Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.55% |
| Assets | $4.9B | $19M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $137M | $212K |
| Listed | Oct 4, 2007 | Aug 12, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 97 | 21 |
| 1-month return | −1.7% | −2.9% |
| 3-month return | −5.5% | −7.4% |
| Year to date | −5.8% | −6.6% |
| 1-year return | −5.1% | −7.0% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.0% | 7.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.1% | −8.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.12% | 4.72% |
| Holdings | 1,833 | 68 |
| Top 10 weight | 4.0% | 31.4% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$349M thru May 2026 | +$3.6M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · RMCA holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.