RMCA Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

RMCA — —
Key stats
About

Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
ARCX
Inception
2024-08-12
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingthrough Jul 2026flows, SEC filings
Expense ratio
0.55%
prospectus, filed Feb 12, 2026
Assets
$19M
shares × price, Oct 9, 2026
Trailing yield
4.72%
paid monthly
Average daily volume
$212K
30 sessions
Holdings
68
top 10 are 31.4%
Listed
Aug 12, 2024
NYSE Arca
Closure risk, 12 months
5.6%
low: trading volume, age · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
21
how it is built
Cost6
Liquidity11
Scale5
Diversification76

Moves with. Long Treasuries (26% of its variance, beta 0.22); US large-cap stocks (6% of its variance, beta 0.06). These factors explain 34% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.

Stated objective. The Fund seeks income exempt from U.S. federal and California state income tax. (from the fund's prospectus)

All 68 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll State Muni ETFs

Fund flows
through Jul 2026SEC filings
Jul 2026
$0
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
+$3.6M
+18.9% of assets
Latest 12 months
+$2.3M
+12.0% of assets
Aug 2025: +$2.3MSep 2025: −$2.4MSepOct 2025: −$2.5M−$2.5MNov 2025: $0NovDec 2025: −$2.4MJan 2026: +$2.4M+$2.4MJanFeb 2026: $0Mar 2026: +$1.2MMarApr 2026: $0May 2026: +$2.4MMayJun 2026: +$1.2MJul 2026: $0Jul
View as a table
Net flows of RMCA by month, Aug 2025 to Jul 2026
MonthNet flow
Jul 2026$0
Jun 2026+$1.2M
May 2026+$2.4M
Apr 2026$0
Mar 2026+$1.2M
Feb 2026$0
Jan 2026+$2.4M
Dec 2025−$2.4M
Nov 2025$0
Oct 2025−$2.5M
Sep 2025−$2.4M
Aug 2025+$2.3M

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 24 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF—0.08%$4.9B−5.1%compare
VTECVanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF—0.06%$3.2B−5.3%compare
NYFiShares New York Muni Bond ETF—0.09%$1.6B−5.2%compare
NYMAB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF—0.27%$1.3B—compare
CAMAB California Intermediate Municipal ETF—0.27%$1.2B−3.6%compare

The largest other funds in the State Muni category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Jul 31, 2025SEC census
Authorized participants
1 active
of 1 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
Created · redeemed
$20M · $2.4M
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
100%
creations 100% in kind
Creation unit
100,000
shares
Securities lending
not authorized
Diversification status
Non-diversified
may concentrate in fewer issuers

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-07-31
Holdings
65
AUM
$14.3M
Provider
Nport
Inception
2024-08-12
Exchange
ARCX
Data As Of
2026-07-31
Expense Ratio
0.55%
Dividend Yield
4.72%
Distribution
Monthly
Recent distributions
Ex-Date Pay Date Amount Type
2026-09-29 2026-09-30 $0.0847 CD
2026-08-28 2026-08-31 $0.0828 CD
2026-07-30 2026-07-31 $0.0954 CD
2026-06-29 2026-06-30 $0.0794 CD
2026-05-28 2026-05-29 $0.0754 CD
2026-04-29 2026-04-30 $0.0919 CD
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 65 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— State of California 3.69% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 3.61% Debt US
— Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Brick 3.58% Debt US
— Lammersville Joint Unified School District 3.56% Debt US
— California Housing Finance Agency 3.53% Debt US
— Downey Unified School District 3.28% Debt US
— California School Facilities Financing Authority 3.20% Debt US
— City of Los Angeles Department of Airports 2.92% Debt US
— CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FIN AUTH SEN 2.80% Debt US
— CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING A 2.63% Debt US
— California County Tobacco Securitization Agency 2.35% Debt US
— California State University 2.24% Debt US
— California Statewide Communities Development Autho 2.11% Debt US
— California Health Facilities Financing Authority 2.07% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 2.00% Debt US
— Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority 1.94% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 1.94% Debt US
— CALIFORNIA STWD CMNTYS DEV AUT 1.93% Debt US
— California Infrastructure & Economic Development B 1.91% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 1.89% Debt US
— Washington Township Health Care District 1.89% Debt US
— San Diego County Regional Airport Authority 1.83% Debt US
— Los Angeles Department of Water & Power 1.81% Debt US
— California Statewide Communities Development Autho 1.80% Debt US
— County of Sacramento CA Airport System Revenue 1.80% Debt US
— San Francisco City & County Airport Comm-San Franc 1.79% Debt US
— San Francisco City & County Airport Comm-San Franc 1.79% Debt US
— City of Oakland CA 1.76% Debt US
— Mountain House Community Facilities District 1.74% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 1.73% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 1.72% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 1.70% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 1.53% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 1.37% Debt US
— Children's Trust Fund 1.36% Debt US
— California Statewide Communities Development Autho 1.29% Debt US
— SILICON VLY CA TOBACCO SECURIT 1.28% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 1.19% Debt US
— CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FIN AUTH SEN 1.18% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 1.14% Debt US
— CALIFORNIA ST MUNI FIN AUTH SE 1.07% Debt US
— San Diego County Regional Airport Authority 1.03% Debt US
— California Statewide Communities Development Autho 1.03% Debt US
— Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sales Tax Rev 0.99% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 0.98% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 0.97% Debt US
— Children's Trust Fund 0.94% Debt US
— California Municipal Finance Authority 0.82% Debt US
— California School Finance Authority 0.79% Debt US
— California Health Facilities Financing Authority 0.66% Debt US
Non-Equity Breakdown
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF · NPORT-P period 2026-04-30 (filed 2026-06-25)
Net assets: $16M · 68 total positions · equity 0.00% · non-equity 98.25%
Non-equity holdings — 68 positions, 98.25% of NAV
Category Weight Value Positions
Municipal 98.25% $15.5M 68
Chart
Seasonality
Month'24'25'26Avg
Jan---0.19%-0.06%-0.12%
Feb--1.32%1.12%1.22%
Mar---1.97%-1.50%-1.73%
Apr---1.91%0.44%-0.73%
May---1.23%0.33%-0.45%
Jun--0.46%0.70%0.58%
Jul---1.57%-2.35%-1.96%
Aug0.15%-0.46%-0.86%-0.39%
Sep0.43%3.54%-4.27%-0.10%
Oct-2.14%0.59%-0.57%*-0.71%
Nov1.55%0.24%--0.90%
Dec-2.31%-0.66%---1.49%
Total-2.36%-1.96%-6.92%-3.74%
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $22.92
SMA 50: $23.49
SMA 200: $24.08
Current: $22.49
EMA 12: $22.71
EMA 26: $23.00
MACD: -0.2964 | Signal: -0.0112
BEARISH
ADX (14): 39.05
TREND
+DI: 19.52
−DI: 56.32

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 27.65
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 17.35
Stoch %D: 22.56
Williams %R: -86.14

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $23.59
BB Lower: $22.24
NEUTRAL
OBV: -189,363
Vol SMA 20: 7,701
Vol ROC: -21.14%
ATR: $0.12
True Range: $0.10
HV 20: 8.2%
HV 30: 7.0%
HV 60: 6.0%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-10T00:00:00 – 2026-10-08T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

RMCA Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.1026
Alpha: -8.86%
Correlation: 0.3126
R-Squared: 9.8%
Stock Volatility: 4.3%
Market Volatility: 13.0%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

RMCA Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-06-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

5 filers962,940 shares$23.57M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Rockefeller Capital Management L.P. Custodian 615,479 $15.07M 63.92% — 2026-06-30
2 Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. 296,188 $7.25M 30.76% — 2026-06-30
3 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 42,973 $1.05M 4.46% — 2026-06-30
4 FIFTH THIRD BANCORP 4,150 $101.59K 0.43% — 2026-06-30
5 COMERICA BANK Custodian 4,150 $100.30K 0.43% — 2025-12-31
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month