CRF vs PYLD

Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
20.1 pts
PYLD is ahead
Larger fund
PYLD
$16.4B

Side by side

CRFPYLD
FundCornerstone Total Return Fund, IncPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssuerCornerstonePIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio—0.64%
Assets$967M$16.4B
Average daily dollar volume$8.9M$182M
ListedNov 5, 1987Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score6970
1-month return−2.9%−1.5%
3-month return−14.2%−2.4%
Year to date−25.6%−4.6%
1-year return−25.4%−5.3%
30-day volatility18.7%4.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−28.1%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—6.59%
Holdings—2,016
Top 10 weight—24.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CRF holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.