CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc
XASEStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $1.0B
- List Date
- 1987-11-05
- CIK
- 0000033934
- Homepage
- https://www.cornerstonetotalreturnfund.com
Cornerstone Total Return Fund Inc is a diversified closed-end management company. Its objective is to seek capital appreciation with current income as a secondary objective. The company invests in sectors such as Information Technology, Health Care, Financials, Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, Exchange-Traded Funds, Utilities, Energy, Real Estate, and others.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $967M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $8.9M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Nov 5, 1987 NYSE American
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (28% of its variance, beta 0.76). These factors explain 31% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF | — | 0.40% | $16.5B | −4.9% | compare |
| PYLDPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF | — | 0.64% | $16.4B | −5.3% | compare |
| JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF | — | 0.39% | $11.2B | −3.2% | compare |
| BONDPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | — | 0.54% | $8.6B | −6.8% | compare |
| CGCPCapital Group Core Plus Income ETF | — | 0.34% | $8.5B | −6.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Multisector Bond category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 9.04% | -0.22% | 6.68% | 0.28% | 1.72% | -1.49% | 2.67% |
| Feb | -0.39% | -2.44% | -4.02% | 1.11% | -11.44% | -6.05% | -3.87% |
| Mar | 3.36% | 1.83% | -3.27% | 2.60% | -6.02% | -5.83% | -1.22% |
| Apr | -13.14% | -28.66% | -0.53% | -0.79% | -7.47% | 3.84% | -7.79% |
| May | -1.85% | 8.76% | 0.27% | 1.73% | 12.48% | 1.10% | 3.75% |
| Jun | 1.43% | -17.77% | 5.26% | 2.08% | 2.24% | -1.51% | -1.38% |
| Jul | 1.23% | 11.95% | 4.81% | -0.25% | -1.02% | -0.42% | 2.72% |
| Aug | 7.16% | 0.84% | -3.53% | 0.77% | 1.68% | -9.85% | -0.49% |
| Sep | -1.19% | -15.94% | -2.68% | 4.52% | 2.94% | -2.84% | -2.53% |
| Oct | 5.41% | -4.52% | -17.28% | 4.99% | -0.25% | -3.47%* | -2.52% |
| Nov | 0.22% | 0.37% | 3.75% | 10.32% | -1.48% | -- | 2.64% |
| Dec | 2.08% | -13.83% | -3.68% | -8.33% | 0.50% | -- | -4.65% |
| Total | 12.21% | -50.44% | -15.42% | 19.56% | -7.82% | -24.13% | -11.01% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: CRF
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10) Key Drivers: Technical support, low volatility Primary Risks: Downtrend potential, lack of recent news catalysts
2-3 sentence investment thesis: CRF is currently trading within a neutral range, supported by its SMA 20 and EMA 12 indicators. The stock's low volatility and stable beta indicate a defensive posture, which may limit upside potential.
Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Neutral (no clear trend)
Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20 ($7.90), EMA 12 ($7.95), Bollinger Bands' upper ($8.11) and lower ($7.69) levels
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 42.26 (neutral)
- MACD: Bearish crossover
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal
Volume Analysis: Low volume rate of change (-2.69%), On-Balance Volume (OBV) declining, and volume SMA 20 flat
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no recent news)
Catalyst Identification: None available; focus on upcoming earnings or product launches for potential catalysts.
Market Narrative: Technical signals are currently neutral, with no clear trend or sentiment bias.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta 0.77)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime (stock moves less than market)
Options Market Signals: No options data available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 ($7.90) and EMA 12 ($7.95), with potential for a mean reversion trade
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Neutral (no clear sector bias)
Institutional Activity: No recent institutional activity available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Correlation Analysis: Low correlation to market (R-squared 0.64); potentially defensive posture
Relative Valuation: CRF is trading within its historical range, with no clear valuation bias.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 ($7.90) and EMA 12 ($7.95), Bollinger Bands' upper ($8.11) and lower ($7.69)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or product launches available; focus on technical analysis for insights.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at SMA 20 ($7.90), with potential for a mean reversion trade
This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of CRF's stock performance, highlighting key trends, support and resistance levels, momentum signals, volume patterns, news sentiment, risk metrics, and market context. The analysis concludes that CRF is currently trading within a neutral range, supported by its SMA 20 and EMA 12 indicators, with low volatility and stable beta indicating a defensive posture.
CRF Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $689K | #4122 of 6285 | +826.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $362K | #2258 of 4729 | +2.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CRF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
CRF Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-21| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | Joshua Bradshaw | Vice Chairman and President | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $5.88 | $117.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-01 | Peter Greer | Director | Buy (P) | +1,500 | $6.41 | $9.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-11 | Matthew Morris | Director | Sell (S) | −1 | $7.92 | -$9 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-05 | Matthew Morris | Director | Sell (S) | −53,272 | $7.89 | -$420.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-27 | Ralph W Bradshaw | President | Exer (M) | +2,594 | $6.97 | $18.1K | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-10 | Matthew Morris | Director | Sell (S) | −40,000 | $8.43 | -$337.2K | EDGAR |
| 2022-06-30 | Matthew Morris | Director | Exer (M) | +15,180 | $7.95 | $120.7K | EDGAR |
| 2022-06-29 | Ralph W Bradshaw | President | Exer (M) | +2,000 | $7.95 | $15.9K | EDGAR |
| 2021-09-21 | Matthew Morris | Director | Sell (S) | −13,000 | $12.68 | -$164.8K | EDGAR |
| 2021-05-26 | Glenn W Wilcox Sr | Director | Exer (M) | +2,097 | $10.23 | $21.5K | EDGAR |
| 2021-05-26 | Ralph W Bradshaw | President | Exer (M) | +2,028 | $10.23 | $20.7K | EDGAR |
| 2021-05-26 | Matthew Morris | Director | Exer (M) | +13,034 | $10.23 | $133.3K | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-25 | Glenn W Wilcox Sr | Director | Buy (P) | +2,674 | $12.25 | $32.8K | EDGAR |
| 2020-12-14 | Glenn W Wilcox Sr | Director | Sell (S) | −241 | $11.45 | -$2.8K | EDGAR |
| 2020-03-31 | Matthew Morris | Director | Buy (P) | +30,900 | $8.08 | $249.7K | EDGAR |
CRF Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $5.84| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ralph W Bradshaw | President | 73,352 | $428.7K | $108.3K | 13 | 2025-05-27 |
| 2 | Matthew Morris | Director | 11,466 | $67.0K | -$672.7K | 7 | 2025-09-11 |
| 3 | Peter Greer | Director | 1,501 | $8.8K | $9.6K | 1 | 2026-09-01 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.