DIVE vs OAKG

Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF against Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
OAKG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
DIVE
$49M

Side by side

DIVEOAKG
FundDana Concentrated Dividend ETFOakmark Global Large Cap ETF
IssuerDanaOakmark
CategoryDividendGlobal
Expense ratio0.65%0.62%
Assets$49M$35M
Average daily dollar volume$132K$67K
ListedSep 15, 2025Dec 11, 2025
FrenzyCap score2127
1-month return+3.4%+5.1%
3-month return+1.6%−0.4%
Year to date+10.3%+5.7%
1-year return+15.8%—
30-day volatility13.5%15.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.5%−11.5%
Trailing 12-month yield1.27%0.04%
Holdings3552
Top 10 weight44.4%31.2%
Look-through P/E21.4—
Holdings vs fair value+16.7%—
Holdings above 200-day average64%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$610K thru Aug 2026−$799K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Aug 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

23% of DIVE · 15% of OAKG
HoldingDIVEOAKG
IQV5.53%3.69%
ELV3.77%2.61%
CRM3.93%2.61%
KDP3.99%2.60%
GOOGL1.76%1.85%
COF4.44%1.73%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorDIVEOAKGGap
Health Care17.3%12.0%+5.3%
Financials14.5%10.0%+4.5%
Technology15.7%4.5%+11.3%
Industrials9.1%10.5%−1.4%
Consumer Staples10.3%7.9%+2.4%
Consumer Discretionary12.6%0.0%+12.6%
Real Estate6.9%0.0%+6.9%
Energy5.3%0.7%+4.5%
Utilities2.7%0.0%+2.7%
Materials1.9%0.0%+1.9%
Communication Services0.0%1.0%−1.0%

More: full overlap table · DIVE holdings · OAKG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.