EUM vs SH

ProShares Trust Short MSCI Emerging Markets against ProShares Short S&P500: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
40%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
SH is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.3 pts
SH is ahead
Larger fund
SH
$970M

Side by side

EUMSH
FundProShares Trust Short MSCI Emerging MarketsProShares Short S&P500
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.95%0.89%
Assets$14M$970M
Average daily dollar volume$868K$289M
ListedOct 30, 2007Jun 19, 2006
FrenzyCap score4388
1-month return−0.4%−3.3%
3-month return−4.1%−3.5%
Year to date−21.7%−11.7%
1-year return−23.5%−13.2%
30-day volatility19.3%9.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.7%−18.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.65%4.00%
Holdings617
Top 10 weight45.8%54.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.6M thru May 2026+$50M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility235.5%13.1%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

46% of EUM · 40% of SH
HoldingEUMSH
IQMM45.78%40.17%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · EUM holdings · SH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.