GXPD vs ONLN

Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF against ProShares Online Retail ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
27%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
43 bp
GXPD is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.6 pts
GXPD is ahead
Larger fund
ONLN
$59M

Side by side

GXPDONLN
FundGlobal X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETFProShares Online Retail ETF
IssuerGlobal XProShares
CategoryConsumer DiscretionaryInternet & Innovation
Expense ratio0.15%0.58%
Assets$50M$59M
Average daily dollar volume$583K$168K
ListedJul 22, 2025Jul 13, 2018
FrenzyCap score3629
1-month return+2.1%+3.1%
3-month return−0.8%+0.4%
Year to date−2.3%−3.3%
1-year return−1.3%−6.9%
30-day volatility18.4%20.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−16.6%−19.9%
Trailing 12-month yield0.35%0.29%
Holdings4822
Top 10 weight79.1%67.9%
Look-through P/E27.441.9
Holdings vs fair value+5.4%+10.7%
Holdings above 200-day average55%61%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$24M thru May 2026+$92K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—24.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

46% of GXPD · 44% of ONLN
HoldingGXPDONLN
AMZN42.38%24.00%
MELI1.43%4.16%
EBAY0.70%7.88%
CVNA0.68%4.46%
WSM0.48%3.69%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorGXPDONLNGap
Consumer Discretionary87.1%64.1%+23.0%
Industrials11.4%34.2%−22.8%
Technology0.2%1.7%−1.5%
Materials1.3%0.0%+1.3%

More: full overlap table · GXPD holdings · ONLN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.