IAT vs PFFV

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF against Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
29%
11 shared positions
Fee gap
12 bp
PFFV is cheaper
1-year return gap
17.9 pts
IAT is ahead
Larger fund
IAT
$612M

Side by side

IATPFFV
FundiShares U.S. Regional Banks ETFGlobal X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
IssueriSharesGlobal X
CategoryFinancialsFloating Rate
Expense ratio0.37%0.25%
Assets$612M$335M
Average daily dollar volume$10M$3.3M
ListedMay 1, 2006Jun 22, 2020
FrenzyCap score5658
1-month return−8.2%−1.3%
3-month return−10.1%−2.1%
Year to date+3.3%−3.1%
1-year return+11.2%−6.8%
30-day volatility17.9%3.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−17.8%−6.9%
Trailing 12-month yield2.88%8.23%
Holdings3459
Top 10 weight69.0%31.0%
Look-through P/E11.711.5
Holdings vs fair value+1.9%+22.0%
Holdings above 200-day average17%23%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.1M thru Jun 2026+$10M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility24.6%17.2%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

56% of IAT · 30% of PFFV
HoldingIATPFFV
FITB5.14%4.46%
USB14.98%4.43%
RF4.36%4.45%
KEY3.43%3.14%
PNFP2.68%2.95%
CFG4.47%2.01%
FCNCA3.45%1.94%
WTFC1.84%2.28%
HBAN4.47%1.67%
WAL1.46%1.56%
TFC9.52%0.67%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIATPFFVGap
Financials98.9%69.0%+29.9%
Real Estate0.0%19.5%−19.5%

More: full overlap table · IAT holdings · PFFV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.