MINN vs PWZ

Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF against Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
MINN is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.5 pts
MINN is ahead
Larger fund
PWZ
$1.3B

Side by side

MINNPWZ
FundMairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETFInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
IssuerMairsInvesco
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.25%0.28%
Assets$55M$1.3B
Average daily dollar volume$453K$30M
ListedMar 11, 2021Oct 11, 2007
FrenzyCap score4872
1-month return+5.4%+5.3%
3-month return−1.2%−3.1%
Year to date−3.3%−3.3%
1-year return−2.8%−3.4%
30-day volatility9.2%6.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.7%−10.0%
Trailing 12-month yield3.12%3.92%
Holdings1271,245
Top 10 weight22.9%5.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$5.5M thru Sep 2026+$118M thru Aug 2026
30-day implied volatility—24.8%
Holdings as ofas of Sep 30, 2026SEC filingas of Aug 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of MINN · 0% of PWZ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · MINN holdings · PWZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.