NBGX vs QLTY

Neuberger Growth ETF against GMO U.S. Quality ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
45%
15 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
NBGX is cheaper
1-year return gap
9.8 pts
QLTY is ahead
Larger fund
QLTY
$5.4B

Side by side

NBGXQLTY
FundNeuberger Growth ETFGMO U.S. Quality ETF
IssuerNeubergerGMO
CategoryLarge Cap GrowthQuality
Expense ratio0.44%0.50%
Assets$15M$5.4B
Average daily dollar volume$11K$16M
ListedDec 18, 2024Nov 13, 2023
FrenzyCap score2661
1-month return+4.7%+3.9%
3-month return+5.1%+5.3%
Year to date+9.9%+14.2%
1-year return+9.2%+19.1%
30-day volatility12.9%10.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−15.2%−11.7%
Trailing 12-month yield0.38%0.64%
Holdings5342
Top 10 weight58.4%48.9%
Look-through P/E29.127.1
Holdings vs fair value−2.0%+1.7%
Holdings above 200-day average74%79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months$0 thru May 2026+$709M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

56% of NBGX · 50% of QLTY
HoldingNBGXQLTY
MSFT7.28%7.17%
GOOGL9.07%5.64%
AAPL6.80%5.12%
AVGO4.82%4.79%
META4.92%4.32%
AMZN7.31%3.90%
V2.65%2.58%
LLY2.82%2.52%
GE2.24%1.79%
MA2.06%1.78%
NFLX2.20%1.69%
TJX1.48%1.45%
SNPS1.20%1.49%
JNJ0.97%4.22%
MRK0.22%1.83%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNBGXQLTYGap
Technology52.8%44.0%+8.7%
Consumer Discretionary16.4%9.9%+6.5%
Industrials12.6%13.0%−0.4%
Health Care5.6%19.1%−13.6%
Consumer Staples0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Financials1.9%3.2%−1.3%
Communication Services2.2%1.7%+0.5%
Utilities3.7%0.0%+3.7%

More: full overlap table · NBGX holdings · QLTY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.