PRTO vs RHTX

RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF against RH Tactical Outlook ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
69 bp
PRTO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PRTO
$16M

Side by side

PRTORHTX
FundRCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETFRH Tactical Outlook ETF
IssuerRCNRH
CategoryAllocationTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.82%1.51%
Assets$16M$7.9M
Average daily dollar volume$10K$9K
ListedMar 24, 2026Sep 20, 2012
FrenzyCap score162
1-month return−1.0%+0.4%
3-month return+0.6%+1.6%
Year to date—+7.0%
1-year return—+10.3%
30-day volatility11.0%11.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.1%−12.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings199
Top 10 weight91.7%94.0%
Look-through P/E19.2—
Holdings vs fair value+12.8%—
Holdings above 200-day average38%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.6M thru May 2026−$998K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

29% of PRTO · 52% of RHTX
HoldingPRTORHTX
SPY7.67%44.84%
IWM21.05%7.54%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorPRTORHTXGap
Industrials2.4%0.0%+2.4%
Financials0.0%2.3%−2.3%
Energy1.1%0.0%+1.1%
Technology1.1%0.0%+1.1%

More: full overlap table · PRTO holdings · RHTX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.