RMRC vs TACK

ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF against Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
73%
8 shared positions
Fee gap
11 bp
RMRC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
TACK
$291M

Side by side

RMRCTACK
FundARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETFFairlead Tactical Sector ETF
IssuerARMORFairlead
CategoryBufferTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.58%0.69%
Assets$7.1M$291M
Average daily dollar volume$29K$658K
ListedFeb 23, 2026Mar 22, 2022
FrenzyCap score3239
1-month return−0.0%−0.2%
3-month return−0.5%+0.3%
Year to date—+6.4%
1-year return—+5.9%
30-day volatility8.5%7.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−6.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.94%1.27%
Holdings129
Top 10 weight93.9%99.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.8M thru May 2026+$14M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

73% of RMRC · 100% of TACK
HoldingRMRCTACK
XLP12.59%12.56%
XLU10.62%12.23%
XLRE10.13%12.64%
XLV10.02%12.44%
XLK9.70%11.41%
XLI7.35%12.20%
XLE6.83%13.91%
XLB5.82%12.23%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RMRC holdings · TACK holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.