RWM vs SH

ProShares Short Russell2000 against ProShares Short S&P500: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
SH is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
RWM is ahead
Larger fund
SH
$950M

Side by side

RWMSH
FundProShares Short Russell2000ProShares Short S&P500
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.95%0.89%
Assets$165M$950M
Average daily dollar volume$621M$310M
ListedJan 23, 2007Jun 19, 2006
FrenzyCap score6879
1-month return+3.6%−0.4%
3-month return+5.8%−4.3%
Year to date−11.4%−11.0%
1-year return−11.4%−12.8%
30-day volatility13.3%9.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−26.0%−18.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.29%3.96%
Holdings1117
Top 10 weight5.5%26.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.1M thru May 2026+$50M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility41.4%12.7%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of RWM · 0% of SH

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RWM holdings · SH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.