SH vs TWM

ProShares Short S&P500 against ProShares UltraShort Russell2000: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
6 bp
SH is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.1 pts
SH is ahead
Larger fund
SH
$950M

Side by side

SHTWM
FundProShares Short S&P500ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.89%0.95%
Assets$950M$61M
Average daily dollar volume$310M$22M
ListedJun 19, 2006Jan 23, 2007
FrenzyCap score7957
1-month return−0.4%+7.4%
3-month return−4.3%+11.3%
Year to date−11.0%−23.6%
1-year return−12.8%−23.8%
30-day volatility9.8%26.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−18.7%−46.3%
Trailing 12-month yield3.96%3.80%
Holdings1710
Top 10 weight26.3%0.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$50M thru May 2026+$7.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility12.7%38.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · SH holdings · TWM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.