SMOG vs WATS

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF against Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
16%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
29 bp
WATS is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SMOG
$128M

Side by side

SMOGWATS
FundVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETFCorgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF
IssuerVanEckCorgi
CategoryClean Energy & ClimateEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.64%0.35%
Assets$128M$548K
Average daily dollar volume$154K$20K
ListedMay 3, 2007May 5, 2026
FrenzyCap score3236
1-month return−4.2%−12.9%
3-month return−2.2%−12.2%
Year to date+2.4%—
1-year return+0.4%—
30-day volatility19.1%33.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−16.9%−45.1%
Trailing 12-month yield1.53%—
Holdings5724
Top 10 weight57.9%67.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value—+3.6%
Holdings above 200-day average—17%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.5M thru Jun 2026+$2.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility25.4%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

16% of SMOG · 48% of WATS
HoldingSMOGWATS
TSLA8.62%20.05%
BE5.26%11.50%
ENS0.95%6.01%
ENPH0.63%6.42%
RUN0.26%3.71%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorSMOGWATSGap
Industrials7.4%46.7%−39.3%
Consumer Discretionary14.0%20.1%−6.1%
Technology4.8%12.7%−7.8%
Utilities11.8%4.7%+7.1%
Materials1.4%9.3%−7.9%
Financials0.6%0.0%+0.6%

More: full overlap table · SMOG holdings · WATS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.