URA vs UX

Global X Uranium ETF against Roundhill Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
8 bp
URA is cheaper
1-year return gap
22.8 pts
UX is ahead
Larger fund
URA
$5.4B

Side by side

URAUX
FundGlobal X Uranium ETFRoundhill Uranium ETF
IssuerGlobal XRoundhill
CategoryNuclear & UraniumNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio0.69%0.77%
Assets$5.4B$4.5M
Average daily dollar volume$147M$77K
ListedNov 4, 2010Jan 28, 2025
FrenzyCap score593
1-month return−13.6%−3.1%
3-month return−4.5%+2.9%
Year to date−9.0%−4.7%
1-year return−23.8%−1.0%
30-day volatility41.5%27.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−39.3%−26.1%
Trailing 12-month yield5.36%1.55%
Holdings645
Top 10 weight37.2%103.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$206M thru Jul 2026+$1.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility42.1%31.7%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of URA · 0% of UX

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorURAUXGap
Materials8.2%0.0%+8.2%
Utilities6.2%0.0%+6.2%
Industrials5.5%0.0%+5.5%
Financials0.6%0.0%+0.6%

More: full overlap table · URA holdings · UX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.