AXIA Energia American Depositary Shares (Each representing one Common Share)(AXIA)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $23.9B
Axia Energia is engaged in the generation, transmission, and commercialization of electricity in Brazil. The company operates a portfolio of wind, thermal, hydro, and nuclear power plants located throughout the country.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +11.33% | 1 |
| Feb | +15.38% | 1 |
| Mar | -3.26% | 1 |
| Apr | +9.42% | 1 |
| May | -17.12% | 1 |
| Jun | +3.13% | 1 |
| Jul | +1.65% | 1 |
| Aug | -2.11% | 1 |
| Sep | — | 0 |
| Oct | — | 0 |
| Nov | +7.60% | 1 |
| Dec | +0.07% | 1 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: AXIA
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD signal
- Trend direction is bearish based on SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 12
- High volatility indicated by beta value of 1.38
Primary Risks:
- Potential breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band ($10.17)
- Increased selling pressure if price touches the upper Bollinger Band ($13.06)
Investment Thesis: AXIA's recent bearish momentum and high volatility may lead to a further decline in the short term. However, the stock's potential support at the lower Bollinger Band and the relatively low RSI value (34.53) suggest that a bounce or mean reversion is possible.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Bearish Medium-term: Bearish Long-term: Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($10.17)
- Middle Bollinger Band ($11.62)
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal is bearish, indicating a potential sell signal
- RSI is neutral (34.53), indicating no clear buy or sell signal
- Stochastic %K and %D are both below 20, suggesting oversold conditions
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1983971.25
- OBV: 16337506.50
- Volume Rate of Change: 7.96%
- Institutional interest signals: High volume and institutional buying
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or earnings releases
Market Narrative: The lack of recent news highlights the importance of technical analysis in this situation. The bearish MACD signal and trend direction suggest that a further decline is possible.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: AXIA's beta value of 1.38 indicates high risk relative to the market (SPY).
Volatility Regime: High volatility, as indicated by the stock's historical volatility values and IV premium vs HV30.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: N/A
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: No unusual options activity detected
Downside Protection: The lower Bollinger Band ($10.17) provides potential support for the stock, but it is crucial to monitor this level and adjust risk management strategies accordingly.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: AXIA's performance is relatively weak compared to its sector.
Institutional Activity: High volume and institutional buying suggest interest in the stock, which may lead to a bounce or mean reversion.
Correlation Analysis: AXIA's correlation with SPY is 0.45, indicating a moderate positive correlation.
Relative Valuation: AXIA is trading within its historical range, but the bearish momentum suggests that it may be vulnerable to further declines.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($10.17)
- Middle Bollinger Band ($11.62)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($13.06) - potential breakdown
- Support/resistance levels based on SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 12
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or earnings releases
Risk Management: Monitor the lower Bollinger Band and adjust risk management strategies accordingly. Consider setting stop-loss levels at $10.17 or below to limit potential losses.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news sentiment, and market context, it is clear that AXIA is experiencing a bearish trend with high volatility. The lack of recent news highlights the importance of monitoring the stock's price action and adjusting risk management strategies accordingly.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.14
- Correlation (SPY)
- 40.4%
- R²
- 0.16
- Ann. Volatility
- 38.1%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.5%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-17 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Buy (P) | +200,000 | $9.67 | $1.93M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-10 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Sell (S) | −293,200 | $10.04 | -$2.94M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Wolff Elio Gil de Meirelles | See Remarks* | Other (J) | −3 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-07 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Sell (S) | −255,800 | $10.38 | -$2.66M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Nascimento Rodrigo Limp | See Remarks* | Other (J) | −7 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-07 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Other (J) | −400 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Matte Ana Silvia Corso | Director | Buy (P) | +500 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Mixed | −437,400 | $10.24 | -$4.47M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Freitas Marcelo de Siqueira | See Remarks* | Award (A) | +4 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Monteiro Ivan de Souza | See Remarks* | Award (A) | +48 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Marinho Gisomar Francisco de Bittencourt | Director | Award (A) | +1 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Campos Vicente Falconi | Director | Award (A) | +1,488 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Filho Jose Joao Abdalla | Director | Award (A) | +24,173 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | Award (A) | +8,672 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Matte Ana Silvia Corso | Director | Award (A) | +5 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Filho Jose Joao Abdalla | Director | 96,710,152 | $988.38M | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-02 |
| 2 | Campos Vicente Falconi | Director | 4,343,035 | $44.39M | $0 | 5 | 2026-07-02 |
| 3 | de Lima Filho Pedro Batista | Director | 535,924 | $5.48M | -$141.91M | 27 | 2026-07-17 |
| 4 | Monteiro Ivan de Souza | See Remarks* | 416,125 | $4.25M | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-02 |
| 5 | Nascimento Rodrigo Limp | See Remarks* | 170,454 | $1.74M | -$189.8K | 5 | 2026-07-07 |
| 6 | Sampaio Araujo Camila Gualda | See Remarks* | 120,182 | $1.23M | -$289.4K | 5 | 2026-06-29 |
| 7 | Wolff Elio Gil de Meirelles | See Remarks* | 84,623 | $864.8K | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-07 |
| 8 | Freitas Filho Italo Tadeu de Carvalho | See Remarks* | 56,453 | $576.9K | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-29 |
| 9 | Pereira Marisete Fatima Dadald | Director | 51,115 | $522.4K | $0 | 1 | 2026-03-23 |
| 10 | Dias Felipe Villela | Director | 51,115 | $522.4K | $0 | 1 | 2026-03-23 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.