BENF Beneficient Class A Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- FINANCE SERVICES (6199)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
Beneficient is a technology-enabled financial services holding company providing liquidity solutions and trust products and services to participants in the alternative assets industry through an online platform, AltAccess. Its services are focused on alternative asset investors, institutional investors, family offices, and fund managers. The company provides liquidity solutions for alternative asset investments through financing and trust structures. The company has three reportable segments consisting of Ben Liquidity, Ben Custody and Customer ExAlt Trusts. The majority of revenue is derived …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -28.14% | 3 |
| Feb | -29.70% | 3 |
| Mar | -28.31% | 3 |
| Apr | -17.35% | 3 |
| May | +26.08% | 3 |
| Jun | -35.58% | 4 |
| Jul | +2.25% | 4 |
| Aug | -10.42% | 4 |
| Sep | +24.15% | 4 |
| Oct | -20.67% | 3 |
| Nov | -21.04% | 3 |
| Dec | +11.39% | 3 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my response in the format specified:
LLM Stock Analysis Report for BENF
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a neutral trend, with no clear momentum signal
- Recent news headlines are mixed, but overall sentiment is positive
- Risk metrics indicate low volatility and a defensive positioning
Primary risks:
- Lack of earnings data and options activity may limit potential catalysts
- Trend direction uncertain, making it challenging to identify key levels for support/resistance
Investment thesis: BENF's recent compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements and positive news sentiment suggest a potential stabilizing effect. However, the absence of clear momentum signals and lack of earnings data make it difficult to pinpoint specific areas for growth.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive headlines have likely contributed to the stabilization of the stock price, but mixed sentiment from recent news articles (e.g., #2) may have tempered any significant upward movement.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $1.90
- Middle band: $2.30
- Upper band: $2.70
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (45.11)
- MACD signal: Bearish (-0.23 / Signal: 0.03 / Histogram: -0.25)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (34.96)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive sentiment dominates, but mixed news articles (#2) temper the overall outlook.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is positive (4/5).
Catalyst Identification: No clear catalysts identified due to lack of earnings data and options activity.
Market Narrative: Recent news headlines align with neutral technical signals, suggesting a stabilizing effect on the stock price.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta: 0.16).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is lower than historical levels (HV20: 91.5%, HV30: 81.9%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $1.90 and $2.30; risk management considerations include position sizing and stop-loss levels.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: BENF's sector (Financials) has been relatively strong, which may contribute to its stabilizing effect.
Institutional Activity: No clear institutional activity signals can be identified due to lack of options data.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY is low (0.01), indicating a defensive positioning.
Relative Valuation: BENF's valuation is within its historical trading range, suggesting no clear relative value opportunities.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels at $1.90, $2.30, and $2.70.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout/breakdown levels identified due to neutral trend direction.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified due to lack of earnings data and options activity.
Risk Management: Consider position sizing and stop-loss levels at the support/resistance levels mentioned above.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date. Additionally, this report does not provide buy/sell advice but rather a risk/reward analysis.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- -1.70
- Correlation (SPY)
- -4.1%
- R²
- 0.00
- Ann. Volatility
- 536.3%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Karen Wendel | Director | Award (A) | +76,976 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-22 | Bruce William Schnitzer | Director | Award (A) | +395,460 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-22 | Mack H. Hicks | Director | Award (A) | +53,656 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-22 | PETER T CANGANY JR | Director | Award (A) | +280,602 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-17 | James G. Silk | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +9,434 | $1.06 | $10.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-17 | Derek L. Fletcher | See Remarks | Buy (P) | +4,717 | $1.06 | $5.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-17 | PETER T CANGANY JR | Director | Buy (P) | +18,868 | $1.06 | $20.0K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mack H. Hicks | Director | 11,587,533 | $16.34M | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
| 2 | James G. Silk | Chief Executive Officer | 1,110,930 | $1.57M | $10.0K | 1 | 2026-09-17 |
| 3 | Bruce William Schnitzer | Director | 294,980 | $415.9K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
| 4 | PETER T CANGANY JR | Director | 143,989 | $203.0K | $20.0K | 2 | 2026-09-22 |
| 5 | Karen Wendel | Director | 102,890 | $145.1K | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
| 6 | Derek L. Fletcher | See Remarks | 5,336 | $7.5K | $5.0K | 1 | 2026-09-17 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-07 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 1,000,000 | $105.2K | 2024-03-06 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-27 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 1,000,000 | $135.0K | 2024-02-27 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-23 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 500,000 | $98.8K | 2024-02-23 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-08 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 500,000 | $159.9K | 2024-02-07 | BTIG, LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-06 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 500,000 | $250.6K | 2023-12-05 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-19 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 500,000 | $365.5K | 2023-10-19 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-09-08 | Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 500,000 | $1.59M | 2023-09-08 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.