ECDA ECD AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN NEW

OTC Link
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

ECDA — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES (3711) · industry map
Exchange
OTC Link
Market Cap
$0.0B
Employees
105
List Date
2023-12-13
CIK
0001922858
Last Earnings
Apr 16
Headquarters
Hingham, MA
Homepage
https://www.ecdautodesign.com

ECD Automotive Design Inc is a custom-car builder in the Restomod sector with a focus on British classic motor vehicles of various models of both two-door and four-door styles. The company has established a facility geared towards producing the majority customized Land Rovers with the highest quality of parts and the highest quality labor force building each vehicle. ECD restores Land Rovers Defenders, Land Rover Series IIA, the Range Rover Classic and the Jaguar E-Type. It upgrade any engine, including Chevrolet V8's, Land Rover V8's, Cummins diesel engines and new electric drivetrains, perfo…

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 1062 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $0.01
SMA 50: $0.09
SMA 200: $19.76
Current: $0.01
EMA 12: $0.01
EMA 26: $0.07
MACD: -0.0530 | Signal: 0.0232
BEARISH
ADX (14): 25.58
TREND
+DI: 21.27
−DI: 33.86

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 23.19
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 23.00
Stoch %D: 25.04
Williams %R: -81.69

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $0.02
BB Lower: $0.01
NEUTRAL
OBV: 27,659,068
Vol SMA 20: 346,243
Vol ROC: 149.93%
ATR: $0.02
True Range: $0.00
HV 20: 215.5%
HV 30: 217.8%
HV 60: 607.6%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-03-18T00:00:00 – 2026-03-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

News
All ECDA news →

ECDA Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 1062 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.

ECDA Institutional Ownership (13F)

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

ECDA Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Mar 25, 2026

Directors 1

10% owners 5

  • ATW Partners Opportunities Management, LLC (entity) · since Mar 11, 2026
  • Antonio Ruiz-Gimenez · since Mar 11, 2026
  • Atw Opportunities Master Fund II LP (entity) · since Mar 11, 2026
  • Defender SPV LLC (entity) · since Mar 11, 2026
  • Kerry Propper · since Mar 11, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (34)
Mar 11, 2026Kerry Propper became a 10% owner
Mar 11, 2026Defender SPV LLC became a 10% owner
Mar 11, 2026Atw Opportunities Master Fund II LP became a 10% owner
Mar 11, 2026Antonio Ruiz-Gimenez became a 10% owner
Mar 11, 2026ATW Partners Opportunities Management, LLC became a 10% owner
Sep 16, 2024The company announced the departure of Thomas Ashley Humble from the board in an SEC filing
Sep 16, 2024The company announced the departure of Raymond Cole as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing
Sep 16, 2024The company announced the departure of Benjamin J Piggott from the board in an SEC filing
Dec 18, 2023Benjamin J Piggott no longer listed as CEO in SEC filings
Dec 12, 2023Thomas Ashley Humble became a director
Dec 12, 2023Thomas Ashley Humble became a 10% owner
Dec 12, 2023Thomas Ashley Humble became Chief Experience Officer
Dec 12, 2023Scott Malcom Wallace became a director
Dec 12, 2023Scott Malcom Wallace became a 10% owner
Dec 12, 2023Scott Malcom Wallace became Chief Executive Officer
Dec 12, 2023Robert Barry Machinist became a director
Dec 12, 2023Raymond Cole became Chief Financial Officer
Dec 12, 2023Patrick M Lavelle became a director
Dec 12, 2023Emily Jayne Humble became a director
Dec 12, 2023Emily Jayne Humble became a 10% owner
Not reported recently (13)
  • Patrick M Lavelle · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 27, 2024
  • Robert Barry Machinist · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 27, 2024
  • Thomas Ashley Humble · Last reported as Chief Experience Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2023
  • Elliot James Humble · Last reported as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2023
  • Scott Malcom Wallace · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2023
  • Emily Jayne Humble · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 15, 2023
  • Stanley Hutton Rumbough · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 3, 2022
  • EF Hutton Partners, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Sep 16, 2022
  • Paul Hodge Jr. · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2022
  • Joseph Thomas Rallo · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2022
  • Kevin Bush · Last reported as CFO & Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2022
  • David Boral · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2022
  • Anne J. Lee · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 8, 2022
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

ECDA vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
TSLA Tesla, Inc. Common Stock $1.42T 418.5 +8.3% −13.1% 44
TM Toyota Motor Corporation American Deposi $254.6B — — +0.9% 33
GM General Motors Company $73.1B 20.2 −0.3% +10.9% 42
RACE Ferrari N.V. $72.9B — — +13.0% 11
PCAR Paccar Inc $53.7B 20.2 −1.5% −4.9% 49
F Ford Motor Company $49.7B — −1.4% −5.9% 18
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. American Depositar $46.4B — — +20.1% 99
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. Class A Common S $19.9B — +11.1% −27.7% 33
ECDA ECD AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN NEW $0M — — −97.3% —
Peer median $63.3B 20.2 −0.3% −2.0% 38

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.